Mark Hughes: F1’s last-minute Suzuka fix hasn’t gone far enough
F1 cut Suzuka’s energy limit by a megajoule, but the fundamental problem remains, says Mark Hughes
Formula 1 and the FIA have together got themselves into a potentially sticky situation regarding additional new teams. It will be recalled that FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem opened up the tendering process for potential new teams a couple of years ago and that Michael Andretti’s Andretti Autosport IndyCar team jumped through the required hoops to apply. Three others have since done so, the most serious-looking of them being Hitech, the Silverstone-based team with a great reputation in the FIA feeder formulas, F2, F3, Formula Regional and F4. It expanded with the help of the father of Russian driver Nikita Mazepin before the FIA placed restrictions on Russian drivers after the Ukrainian invasion. The FIA has yet to approve any of the applicants.
The FIA can decide which applicants get a licence to enter, but has no say in the commercial agreement under which a team would compete. That is the preserve of the commercial rights holder, Liberty Media and its F1 management arm FOM. It is FOM which makes the commercial agreements with the teams, what their share of prize money and TV rights money is, etc. Competing in F1 without taking a share of the income would be a way to lose multiple millions year after year.
Neither FOM nor most of the other teams see the benefit to the sport of any additional teams beyond the current 10. They do not believe the new teams would grow the cake enough (through the extra interest and sponsorship) that each team’s smaller slice would be a bigger number than they currently enjoy. In their judgement the best way to grow the sport and maximise its total revenue is to have a select number of high-quality teams all of which will earn good income from their share of the spoils. In combination with the cost cap on expenditure, everyone should be able to compete and be profitable.
In Liberty’s franchise business model for F1, they argue that if someone new wishes to enter F1 they should buy an existing team. The recent sale of a shareholding in the Alpine F1 team puts a nominal value on that team of £900m.
“At the moment Ben Sulayem is holding a hand grenade”
When the FIA president announced that application process, it rather took Liberty by surprise. There was for sure a power play element to this. Ben Sulayem was keen to be seen in overall charge but his actions and statements have had a certain scatter-gun quality. In theory there is not one body in overall charge. It is the FIA’s championship but with the commercial rights leased out to an entirely separate body. But perception is important. A significant part of the FIA’s income comes from the F1 lease. The F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali is a more serene operator and very smart. He likes to project consensus and prefers to work that way, but there’s a steely purpose within him.
Once Ben Sulayem had opened up the entry process, the FIA was obliged to consider each application and if they meet all the sporting, financial and technical stipulations made, it would be quite tricky to refuse to grant them a licence to compete. Which potentially puts the sport in a position where the FIA publicly approves one or two new teams, but F1 refuses them access to the commercial agreement. That potentially puts the FIA and FOM on a very public collision course.
The question of what happens next is probably in Ben Sulayem’s hands. If one or more of the teams meets all the stipulated criteria, he could simply announce that the FIA has approved their entry and then leave it up to Liberty to announce that the new teams will not be party to the commercial agreement enjoyed by the existing 10 teams. He would effectively be putting the ball in Liberty’s court, being the good guy publicly for bringing new blood into the sport, obliging Liberty to accept them or be the bad guys publicly by refusing to do so.
The chances of Liberty accepting any of the new teams currently looks slim and so if Ben Sulayem makes a unilateral announcement that the FIA has granted licences, Liberty would have to publicly say “no” to any commercial deal for the new teams. So if the FIA did grant the sporting licences and the president then made the unilateral announcement confirming that, it would be a highly charged and very combative position to take with Liberty. It might also trigger legal complications between the teams, the FIA and Liberty.
Would Ben Sulayem have the appetite to go up against Domenicali and Liberty if push came to shove? Or would he prefer to find a way for the FIA to pull itself out of that awkward situation?
At the moment he’s holding a hand grenade and needs a way of not pulling the pin and saving face in the process. One way might be to find good reason why none of the teams have met the criteria. Another might be a simple joint FIA/Liberty statement that although the applicants passed the sporting part of the process, it has not been possible to agree a commercial deal.
Either way, the chances of a new Formula 1 team actually joining the grid any time soon currently look remote.
Since he began covering grand prix racing in 2000, Mark Hughes has forged a reputation as the finest Formula 1 analyst of his generation
Follow Mark on Twitter @SportmphMark
F1 cut Suzuka’s energy limit by a megajoule, but the fundamental problem remains, says Mark Hughes
The real story behind Adrian Newey’s changing role at Aston Martin has nothing to do with the F1 team’s struggles, as Mark Hughes explains
The Melbourne spectacle was tough to digest, but Shanghai exposed an upside to Formula 1’s new rules, showing that the series can deliver racing that’s thrilling and skilful, as Mark Hughes explains
After artificial-looking overtaking in Melbourne, the 2026 Chinese Grand Prix saw a return to F1 drivers following closely and then out-braking each other. Mark Hughes on the Shanghai spectacle
As George Russell takes F1 sprint pole in China, Mark Hughes wonders whether Mercedes has a bigger advantage than we’re seeing, and if Red Bull finally has a solution to a long-standing problem
Outspoken drivers say that F1’s new rules are an accident waiting to happen — and there are signs that they are being listened to. Mark Hughes examines the
unrest beneath the Australian GP spectacle
The 2026 Formula 1 season roared into life with a whirlwind of overtaking at the front. But, in the excitement of the lead battle between George Russell and Charles Leclerc, one key element looks to have been lost
Why did Ferrari’s pre-season promise disappear in qualifying for the 2026 Australian Grand Prix? Mark Hughes has a theory that we may soon see it again
It’d be easy to laugh at Aston Martin’s disastrous start to 2026 after owner Lawrence Stroll invested millions into making it an F1 super-team. But don’t mock, writes Mark Hughes. Adrian Newey’s ambitious design could well come good
As F1’s all-new cars emerged for the final Bahrain test, the different design choices taken by each team revealed themselves. Mark Hughes dissects the loophole-hunting ingenuity and calculated compromises that are beginning to define an early pecking order
Mark Hughes unpicks the energy deployment data, the Mercedes engine intrigue and Red Bull Powertrains’ ominous long runs from Bahrain F1 testing to ask who was really fastest
Mercedes’ F1 rivals are united in protesting its new power unit, as the series aims to stamp out “smart rule interpretation”. But it won’t be easy to resolve, explains Mark Hughes