Can McLaren's 'entirely new' F1 car be a Mercedes beater?

F1
April 29, 2026

Miami Grand Prix briefing
Formula 1 returns from its enforced break with tweaked regulations, upgraded cars and plenty to prove at the 2026 Miami Grand Prix

Oscar Piastri, McLaren, ahead of George Russell, Mercedes, during the Japanese GP

McLaren was Mercedes' closest challenger in Japan

McLaren

April 29, 2026

Formula 1 returns from its longest break of the season with more questions than answers.

Five weeks have passed since Kimi Antonelli took victory in Japan, and in that time the sport has been in near-constant debate about the regulations that govern it, with the FIA responding to widespread criticism by introducing a package of power unit tweaks designed to reduce the energy management that has defined, and in many eyes diminished, the opening three rounds.

Miami is the first chance to find out whether it has worked.

The Miami International Autodrome has not been shy of drama in its short history, and this weekend carries extra weight beyond the usual sprint format.

Every team arrives with significant upgrades — some, like McLaren, billing its car as entirely new — after an unusually long stretch at the factory.

The pecking order that emerged in Australia, China and Japan may look rather different by Sunday evening.

At the top of the standings, Mercedes arrives as the team to beat: Antonelli leading team-mate George Russell by nine points in a championship that so far has belonged entirely to the Silver Arrows.

The question is not whether it remains favourite, it does, but whether the combination of new regulations, new car concepts and a circuit that has historically favoured its closest rivals is finally enough to bring the rest of the field into the conversation.

What to watch out for: McLaren’s reset

Lando Norris, McLaren, during the Japanese GP

McLaren plans big upgrades for the next races

McLaren

McLaren’s bid for a third consecutive constructors’ championship had a wobbly start when the team found itself trailing the leaders; its closest competitor in the title race is currently fourth-placed Haas.

Miami brings the chance of a reset. It’s something of a talismanic track for the team after it arrived there in 2024 with an upgraded car which launched it into championship contention by way of Lando Norris‘s maiden grand prix victory. Last year was a papaya whitewash as the drivers finished 1-2 in both the sprint and GP.

To aid its chances of closing that gap, McLaren has spoken of bringing an “entirely new” car over the course of the next two races, and believes it is now getting the maximum out of its Mercedes HPP customer engine, which it was struggling to do – in contrast with the championship-leading factory team – at the start of the year.

“We have made a significant step forward compared to where we were in Australia,” said team principal Andrea Stella. “While at the start of the season, a deficit might have existed for the natural consequence of being a customer team… I think we have filled this gap, and we should have all the tools that are required to extract the most out of the power unit.”

Yet the mood within the team is one of cautious realism rather than optimism. “I would love to say yes, but I don’t really think so,” said Piastri when asked whether McLaren could challenge Mercedes this weekend. “We’re clearly still a fair way behind on downforce and performance from the chassis. Our biggest deficit in Japan was, not that we were lacking time from the power unit, or how we exploited it – it was that our car wasn’t as good as theirs.”

The team is hopeful that having a month without travelling to races has helped it deliver significant upgrades, but Stella conceded that others will be in the same position.

“There was always the idea to deliver sort of a completely new car, especially from an aerodynamic upgrades point of view for the North American races. Obviously, the fact that the calendar has been changed helped, like I’m sure helped all the other teams, [to] work more streamlined towards upgrading the car, rather than being busy with racing.

“Across Miami and Canada, we will see an entirely new MCL40. I would like to stress that this is what I would expect of most of our competitors. So not necessarily is going to be a shift in the pecking order. It will be effectively just a check who has been able to add more performance within the same time frame. And we also have some performance to recover if we look at Mercedes and to some extent Ferrari as well.

“Hopefully we should be able to see a slightly more competitive MCL40 in Miami and then in Canada.”

The hope within the team is that it can come close enough to take advantage of the internal battle for dominance within Mercedes between George Russell and Kimi Antonelli – much like Max Verstappen fought the McLarens last season in a car that didn’t quite have the same pace.

“The more they can battle, the better it’s been,” said Norris. “We certainly hope that we can catch up, and the more points they can take away from each other the better – the same as kind of like us last year and Max in a fight. Hopefully it can be a similar story, but the other way around.”

Of course, that’s likely to mean that McLaren would have to put the weight of the team behind a single driver.

 

Who’s under pressure: The rules

Damaged F1 race car loaded onto recovery truck after Suzuka crash 2026

Bearman’s crash left the FIA with no option but to act

Getty

Three races in, the verdict from drivers, teams and fans about the 2026 technical rules has been pointed enough that the FIA has already felt compelled to act.

The specific complaints are well-documented by now.

Extreme energy management has forced drivers to lift and coast to a degree that has been visible, jarring and, in the eyes of many, antithetical to what a grand prix should look like.

Cars have appeared to slow on the straights mid-session, drivers managing deployment windows rather than racing. The criticism, in conjunction with Oliver Bearman‘s crash at Suzuka, reached a level that made it difficult to dismiss as simple resistance to change.

So the FIA has responded. A package of regulation tweaks has been introduced ahead of Miami, designed to reduce the most counterintuitive driving behaviours and allow for more sustained flat-out running.

The changes have been cautiously welcomed, but most people noted that more meaningful gains may ultimately require hardware solutions rather than regulatory adjustments.

Related article

With that in mind, what arrives in Miami is a sticking plaster rather than surgery, and the question hanging over the weekend is whether it is enough to meaningfully change what people see on track.

If drivers are still visibly managing energy through the long straights of the Miami International Autodrome, a circuit that, with its three straight mode zones and emphasis on top speed, is likely to expose any remaining issues, the conversation will be difficult to contain.

The sprint format will add further scrutiny. With only 90 minutes of practice before competitive action begins – itself an extension from the standard 60, granted specifically in recognition of the regulatory changes and the five-week gap since Japan – there is limited time for teams to optimise around the new parameters before the cameras are rolling in anger.

The Friday and Saturday action will offer early evidence of whether the tweaks have had any tangible effect, well before Sunday’s grand prix delivers a fuller picture.

There is a reasonable case for patience, and the FIA’s willingness to make adjustments mid-season could yet be read as responsiveness rather than panic.

The opening races were always likely to be the most difficult, with teams still finding the limits of cars that are genuinely unlike anything that has come before.

But patience has limits, and Miami feels like a meaningful threshold, particularly after a five-week break that gives the feeling the season started ages ago.

If the driving and the racing improve noticeably, the rules may earn themselves more time. If not, however, the regulations will continue to be the main talking point for a while longer, overshadowing everything else.

 

Historical highlight: Building Miami

Fake marina before the 2022 Miami Grand Prix at the Miami International Autodrome

No, that’s not real water

Grand Prix Photo

With just four editions of the Miami Grand Prix in the books, the circuit’s history is still being written.

There are moments worth revisiting; Max Verstappen’s back-to-back victories in 2022 and 2023, Lando Norris’s breakthrough maiden win in 2024, Oscar Piastri’s defence of McLaren’s unlikely stranglehold on the event in 2025, but none yet carry the weight of true F1 folklore.

So instead of looking back at what has happened at the Miami International Autodrome, it is worth appreciating how it came to exist at all, as the circuit’s creation was a more involved process than most.

Before a single metre of tarmac was laid, designers tested no fewer than 36 different track layouts around the Hard Rock Stadium complex in Miami Gardens – home to the NFL’s Miami Dolphins – in search of a configuration that could deliver genuine racing while meeting Formula 1’s safety standards.

The result is a 3.363-mile (5.412km), 19-turn lap that borrows the character of a street circuit without technically being one, with three long straights, significant elevation change between Turns 13 and 16, and a Turn 14-15 chicane that crests and drops on exit in a way that has caught more than one driver out.

The paddock itself sits inside the stadium bowl, which gives the venue a feel unlike almost anywhere else on the calendar: enclosed, loud, and unmistakably American.

The Hard Rock Stadium has hosted six Super Bowls and two baseball World Series, and the Grand Prix has slotted comfortably into that tradition of large-scale event production, for better or worse depending on your tolerance for celebrity cameos and artificial marinas.

 

Pirelli form guide: Miami GP

Pirelli Miami GP form guide