POLICE MOTORIESTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
POLICE v. MOTORISTS
Sir.
Did the correspondents who eomplain of injustice make a statement on oath ? A delcuce which will not submit itself to crossexamination is not worth making.
My encounters With police in 40 years’ motoring do not’ support the allegations of bullying and falsehood. When I was penalised for speeding, the whole procedure was marked by courtesy out fairness. An accident, involving serious. injury to a motorcyclist when I emerged into a major road, was painstakingly investigated for over six v,ecks before the Notice of Intended Proseention was cancelled. When a sheared •diettibutor drive stranded me in Fen country on a bitter winter night, a patrolling constable obtained aid and accommodation in daunting circumstances. It is small wonder that the men who deal is lii t he grins and tragic results.o.f road accidents have little time for the stupid highead who chooses to learn the rules the hard way. I am, Yours. etc.,
Leicester. A. W. BURTON.
