2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Remember when life on the road was one of simple pleasures? Of naturally aspirated engines, manual transmissions and cars that felt under no obligation to scold you if you broke a speed limit by 1mph or dared avert your gaze from the road for a fraction of a second to turn up the volume on the radio? To the common-or-garden tester of modern cars, such days feel as distant as they do enchanted.

And it’s getting worse. Microphone-equipped cameras are now popping up measuring your exhaust noise, and if it’s any louder than its certification documents say it should be, you’re going to get billed. Someone told me at the Bicester Scramble that they’d been pinged for not turning off their engine at some traffic lights…
And it is indicative of how miserable is the lot of the modern motorist that my first thoughts upon climbing aboard this Porsche Cayman GTS were not for its fabulous 4-litre flat-six turbo-free engine, the balance of its handling or the lucidity of its steering, but the fact it’s probably the last new car I’ll ever drive that lets you do just that: drive. No bings, no bongs, no electronic brain thinking it can steer better than you. Just get in, belt up and drive.

So of course you can’t buy one any more. The Cayman and Boxster were killed in Europe some time ago because their security systems were deemed to be not up to regulatory snuff and now they’ve gone in the UK, to be replaced by new cars that sit on an all new EV platform.

Of course the new electric Cayman and Boxster were conceived when people thought electric cars in general would be rather more popular than has so far transpired and electric sports cars in particular: the MG Cyberster is the only one on sale in the UK, just 360 have been sold in the last 18 months according to the How Many Left? website, of which close to 20% are now currently for sale again on Autotrader. The Porsches will, of course, fare better for all sorts of reasons, but the company is clearly nervous about it, and sufficiently so to communicate very recently that ‘top’ models will be fitted with internal combustion engines after all, which would require more than a little re-engineering to achieve.

The outgoing car is simply gorgeous. I took it across my favourite Welsh mountain roads as a kind of valedictory rite and to see, hear and feel it one last time. The Cayman has always been Porsche’s slowest-selling car despite the fact that I could build a sizeable argument to say that, for the money, it is its best too. And this version is the best of them.

Too soon we forget how well-engineered, large-capacity, multi-cylinder engines behave, because there are barely any left. The way the power arrives, not all at once as in an EV, or after you’ve waited for boost to build in turbo motors, but steadily, with ever-increasing urge and aural excitement is a rare delight. If you’ve been driving turbo cars for years you’ve probably forgotten what proper throttle response feels like, or an engine that goes to eight grand sounds like. The Cayman does all this.

“On roads like these, the calibre of this car’s handling is of the highest order”

And yet what is most remarkable about this car, and the key differentiator between it and a 911 (besides price and number of seats) is that the flat six, for all its undoubted glories, is not the headline act in the same way it is in its illustrious stablemate; it’s the supporting cast, letting the real star turn shine brighter.
Find yourself on roads like these and you’ll know in an instant what it is, for the calibre of this car’s handling is of the highest order. People so often equate handling with grip when it is, at best, a small component of what makes such a car memorable to drive. So many other factors that never get mentioned – the driving position, the location of major controls, all-round visibility and even something as apparently minor as the material from which the steering wheel rim is covered are, to me, just as important. And the Cayman gets every one of them right.

You don’t drive it in time-honoured ‘slow-in, fast-out’ 911 tradition to maximise the advantage and attenuate the drawbacks of having your engine outside the wheelbase; in the Cayman ‘fast-in, fast-out’ is the order of the day. Carry the speed, keep off the brakes, maintain the equilibrium and watch this fly. Feel it too as the suspension takes the strain and the grin widens. And when you’re done, cruise home quietly and comfortably, and marvel at its bandwidth.

That’s why I’m going to miss it. There’s so little to criticise. The fuel consumption ain’t great and the interior looks old – but that’s about it. Like all the best Porsches it’s not merely how fun it is to drive, but how that fun is so easily accessed.

So I wait with breath duly bated for its replacement. What an act it has to follow. It’s just as well, then, that no one will know that better than Porsche.


 

PCGB20_0858_fine

Porsche Cayman GTS

  • Price £75,300
  • Engine 4.0 litres, six cylinders, petrol
  • Power 394bhp
  • Torque 317lb ft
  • Weight 1435kg (DIN)
  • Power to weight 275bhp per tonne
  • Transmission Six-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
  • 0-62mph 4.0sec
  • Top speed 179mph
  • Economy 28.0mpg
  • CO2 230g/km
  • Verdict Gives instant, total confidence.

What’s the big idea?
Look out Range Rover, here’s Hyundai’s SUV
Yes, the Hyundai Ioniq 9 is a vast electric SUV. Not as attractive as the Range Rover, nor does it ride or handle with the same aplomb, but it’s far more spacious and therefore better at the business of getting a large number of people from over here to over there. At £65,000, it’s worth a look.
Verdict: It knows what it’s for and does it.


Twingo a-go-go
Another retro-styled EV from Renault
A new Twingo, the fourth generation, is due in mid-2026, shamelessly apeing the style of the original, and after the rapturous reception enjoyed by Renault’s 4 and 5 EVs, hopes will be sky-high that the Twingo will be another cracker. It will be priced from around £17,000.


Ferrari ev takes shape   
Technical details released about the Elettrica 
I’ve seen no evidence that a significant percentage of high-net-worths are stoked by the idea of electric supercars. But the Ferrari Elettrica is still coming and will be
a 1000bhp, two-door, four-seater capable of 0-62mph in 2.5sec. It will likely sit in the same space as the long-gone GTC4 Lusso, but at prices starting at £350,000.

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

F1 and F5000 cars battle at Oulton Park Gold Cup

F1 Surtees TS16 of Chris Perkins leads Gary Lapidus (F5000 Lola T400) at the Oulton Park Gold Cup

Mini Se7ens battle through a smoky Castle Combe corner

Difference of opinion on direction to Quarry bend among Mini Se7ens at Castle Combe

Baby Bertha leads Steve Barnard’s Escort at Castle Combe

Low-slung Escort of Steve Barnard overcame Joe Ward’s Baby Bertha at Combe

Jaguar races through a corner at Silverstone

Toby Smith explores limits in Jag at CSCC Silverstone

Ferrari Club Classic car powers through Castle Combe

…while Ferrari Club Classic series provided more-modern action at the Wiltshire circuit

Classic single-seaters race through Oulton Park

Monster Can-Am March (No3) among 2-Litre beauty at Oulton

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

February 19, 2020

Barcelona-Catalunya, Spain

Pierre Gasly cuts through the air in his AlphaTauri AT01 at F1 pre-season testing, around the time the World Health Organization was declaring a nasty respiratory ailment in China as being an emergency of international concern. Covid would lead to the postponement of the start of the F1 season – Round 1 came in July.

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

1963 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport

Sold by RM Sotheby’s, £13.8M

The huge prices for modern supercars may have been the talk of this year’s Monterey auctions, but the remarkable sum paid for this ultra-rare Corvette proves that serious history still counts. It was one of five Grand Sports created with the input of Le Mans class winner Zora Arkus-Duntov whose obsession with lightness resulted in a pure-bred race car that weighed more than half a ton less than the road model. It was driven to three SCCA wins by Dick Doane in 1963, took second in class at that year’s Nassau Trophy and achieved second-in-class finishes at the Sebring 12 Hours of ’64 and ’65.


Green Jaguar D-Type racing car on a circuit.

Bonhams

1963 Jaguar E-Type XKE

Sold by Bonhams, £82,730

With 19 race victories in the VARA B Production Championships of 1992, ’93 and ’94, this E-type became known simply as ‘No46’. It was later owned by actor Nicolas Cage, who used it as a road car.


Silver Ferrari 360 Modena parked outside a garage.

Gooding Christie’s

2000 Ferrari 360 Modena

Sold by Gooding Christie’s, £189,800

This 360 was expected to sell for upwards of £200k. It had covered just 28,000 miles, was fitted with a few tasty Challenge Stradale bits and it drove through a coveted manual gearbox.


Green MG Midget convertible parked on a country road.

The Market

1979 MG Midget

Sold by The Market, £8420

The Midget may not be the most exotic of classics but this one promised as many ‘smiles per mile’ as a car costing 10 times as much thanks to its 1800cc, Rover K-Series engine which produces 118bhp.


White Toyota Corolla AE86 parked outside a building.

Historics Auctioneers

1986 Toyota Corolla GT

Sold by Historics Auctioneers, £48,048

Had you bought £800 worth of gold in 1999, it would be worth £15,000 today. Alternatively, you could have bought a 13-year-old Corolla GT AE86 for the same money and made three times as much.


Green Petronas-branded performance motorcycle parked outdoors.

Collecting Cars

2003 Petronas FP1

Sold by Collecting Cars, £29,750

World Superbike ace Carl Fogarty’s Foggy Petronas FP1 race team wasn’t his most successful venture – but it did produce 150 street legal versions of the FP1 competition machine. This one had zero miles.


White Triumph TR6 convertible parked beside a field.

Hampson Auctions

1973 Triumph TR6

Sold by Hampson Auctions, £5400

Never restored but still in sound, original condition and running well, this must have been the most affordable on-the-button TR6 to have crossed the auction block in years. It had covered 76,000 miles.


Audi Quattro Rally Car

Iconic Auctioneers

1984 Audi Quattro Turbo Coupé

Sold by Iconic Auctioneers, £9562

The buyer of this desirable Quattro took a gamble – but it was probably worth it. In the same family for 27 years and in storage for the past 13, it was original, complete and very appealing with its factory black paint and zebra pattern seats.


Forthcoming Sale Highlights

● Bonhams. Knokke-Heist, Belgium, October 11

If you have never attended the Zoute Grand Prix in Belgium, it’s worth the effort. It’s not a race, as the title might suggest, but an increasingly popular gathering of classics that includes a reliability rally and this regular Bonhams auction. Highlights include a £1.4m-£1.7m Lamborghini Miura P400 S and a Lancia Delta HF Integrale (£85k-£120k), both yellow.

● H&H, Solihull, October 28

With Bonhams motorcycle department in limbo following the departure of long-standing department head Ben Walker, H&H’s two-wheel sales stand to become even more successful than they already are. This popular event at the National Motorcycle Museum will include a Suzuki-powered Bimota SB3 (£6000-£8000) and a one-owner BMW C1 ‘scooter with a roof’ at around £2500.

● RM Sotheby’s, London, October 31

RM Sotheby’s returns to the swish Peninsula hotel at Hyde Park Corner for this year’s London Auction, where you can buy a wide range of desirables, from a 1903 Clément Rear-Entrance Tonneau to a 2002 Ferrari 550 Maranello. The star could be one of the three Honda NSX sports cars that the Japanese maker provided to Ayrton Senna for use in Europe.

● Gooding Christie’s, New York, November 20-21

Since Americans seemingly have an endless supply of cash to spend on classics, it’s no wonder that the organisers of Paris Rétromobile have taken it to New York. As with the French version, the event’s official auctioneer will be Gooding Christie’s which, among other exotics, will offer a 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 SL Roadster with factory hard top.

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Aston Martin Lagonda shooting brake engine bay

1. Power comes from a fully rebuilt version of the Tadek Marekdesigned 5.3-litre, fuel-injected V8 producing 305bhp

Broad Arrow

Aston Martin’s futuristic Lagonda was for years given a wide berth by collectors fearful of its famously fragile electronics, but now the wedge-shaped wonder penned by William Towns has come to be regarded as a legitimate classic – although even well-sorted examples seldom make more than £40,000 at auction.

Aston Martin Lagonda shooting brake side profile

2. Antrim Blue paintwork enhances the car’s strange elegance

Broad Arrow

Despite its quirks, the Lagonda helped keep Aston Martin afloat during an especially tricky period of its history, since the extravagance of Towns’ design appealed to wealthy Middle Eastern buyers who could not only afford its £50,000 launch price (more than £450,000 today) but also the petrol to run it.

Aston Martin Lagonda interior with leather and wood trim

3. Its four-speed automatic gearbox has been upgraded to modern standards

Broad Arrow

This example, however, was delivered new to Switzerland in 1987 as one of only 76 Series 3 cars built. It was acquired by its current owner nine years later and immediately sent to Aston specialist Roos Engineering in Safenwil where it underwent a four-year transformation into the unique shooting brake that it is today.

Aston Martin Lagonda digital dashboard displaying speed

4. Often troublesome digital display is powered by modern electrics

Broad Arrow

Made with the full support of Aston Martin Lagonda, it was converted using many factory-supplied parts and built within the parameters of the original wheelbase to avoid having to go through Swiss homologation. In addition to the bodywork mods, the car features custom-made windows and carpets, upholstery re-trimmed in Connolly leather and Alcantara, bespoke rear suspension and a fully upgraded electrical system.

Aston Martin Lagonda shooting brake rear luggage area

5. Load area is capacious with custom-made carpets and trim

Broad Arrow

A true one-off and showing fewer than 30,000 miles, it can lay claim to being one of the rarest Astons in existence – and they do say beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Lagonda shooting brake rear with distinctive tail lights

6. Additional rear lights ensure car can still be seen when the tailgate is raised

Broad Arrow

Rear view of Aston Martin Lagonda shooting brake

Conversion to shooting brake was a four-year process (1996-2000)

Broad Arrow

1987 ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA SHOOTING BRAKE
On offer with Broad Arrow, Zürich, Switzerland, November 7. Estimate £225,000-£320,000. No reserve. broadarrowauctions.com

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Genuine Ferrari 360 Challenge race cars have surged in value in recent years, with prices climbing from a low of around £100,000 during the 2010s to as much as half a million today.

On that basis, logic dictates that this 348 Challenge could prove to be a sensible place to put some money – while also being a hoot to drive to the shops.

Front view of red Ferrari 348 Challenge at Motor Wagen

Original paint and wheels

Motor Wagen

Ferrari launched the 348 Challenge in 1993 to capitalise on the growing popularity in Europe of one-make race series at a time when sales of regular 348s were moving at glacial speed. Around 45 Challenge cars were built at the factory, but most started life as standard, road-going 348s which were then modified using a specific parts kit fitted by Ferrari dealers.

The special bits included OMP safety equipment such as race seats, a rollcage, harnesses, a plumbed-in fire extinguisher and a battery isolator switch, while the car’s performance benefited from tuned exhaust and intake systems giving a moderate power boost (from 300bhp to 320bhp).

Lowered suspension along with race tyres and track-compound brake pads improved driving dynamics – but (apart from substituting slicks for road tyres and vice versa) the majority of 348 Challenge cars could still be driven to the circuit, raced and then driven home again in the best gentleman driver tradition.

Ferrari 348 Challenge gated manual gearbox

Manual gearbox is in good condition

Motor Wagen

Such was the success of the 1993 opening season of the European 348 Challenge series that it was expanded to America the following year, with popularity remaining strong until the launch of the replacement programme for the new 355 model in 1995.

And while the standard 348 has never been regarded as one of Ferrari’s finest, the Challenge versions deliver a very different and much-improved driving experience – not least because some of the components used to create them had been developed for the 355.

Ferrari 348 Challenge OMP race seats and rollcage

No rips or tears on the race seats

Motor Wagen

So as well as being a more-than-capable track car, a 348 Challenge is also far nicer as a road car than its ’standard’ siblings.

And Challenge versions don’t come much better than this example on offer at Motor Wagen in Spain which, by the looks of it, has never been used in anger on a race track (possibly since it was one of the 32 built in 1995, when the Challenge series transitioned to the 355).

Rear view of Ferrari 348 Challenge at Motor Wagen

Motor Wagen

With just 59,000km on the clock (36,600 miles), its original paint and wheels are in excellent condition while the race-prepared interior is more or less immaculate and with no signs of the rigours of racing.

Motor Wagen says the all-important gated manual gearbox shifts smoothly, the engine is sweet and that the car has no electrical problems, with lights, windscreen wipers, etc all working correctly and being fully up to standard for road use. Even the race seats are in decent nick, with not a tear in sight.

To us, and given the recent rise of values, this looks like a potential bargain. But we won’t know if we’re wrong or right until we see where 348 Challenge values stand in a few years’ time…


1995 Ferrari 348 challenge
On sale with Motor Wagen, Pineda de Mar, Spain. Asking: £130,000. motorwagenbcn.com

Dealer News

Tubular Bells Maserati still on-song

Red 1978 Maserati Khamsin shown for sale

Cars International

●When your debut album sells in the millions, your car options expand greatly. The first owner of this 1978 MASERATI KHAMSIN, above, below, was MIKE OLDFIELD, whose Tubular Bells LP in the ’70s became a smash after appearing on head-spinningly spooky film The Exorcist. The S-reg Khamsin is one of 71 RHD models made. It’s on sale at McGRATH MASERATI in Hitchin for £120,000.

● The UK car market has had its ninth consecutive month of growth, says the SOCIETY OF MOTOR MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS, with 94,236 new cars on the road in August. “Motorists are responding to the huge choice and compelling offers,” says Mike Hawes, SMMT chief executive. Four of the models in the top six are Chinese.

● “What an incredible car to drive – it’s pure joy and the sound is incredible,” enthused Ferrari F1 ace CHARLES LECLERC, who has taken this recently restored (Ferrari Classiche) RHD 1966 FERRARI 275 GTB/6C, above, for a spin at Fiorano. It’s on sale, £POA, at CARS INTERNATIONAL in Rochford, Essex.

Charles Leclerc with a Ferrari 275 GTB at Fiorano

McGrath Maserati

● A survey of 1000 drivers over the age of 27 by car shopping site CARGURUS reveals that the VW GOLF is the nation’s favourite used car of the last decade, with the BMW X3 and AUDI Q3 making up the podium. Most important quality? Reliability, so said 62%, while six of the top 10 vehicles are SUVs.

● The 76 reg is here so let’s check the DVLA’s banned list. Crime and war are out so GE76 GUN is gone, while RU76 UKR won’t be seen on any G-Wagens soon. And the similarity of EA76 to ‘EATS’ has, alas, evicted a swathe of profanity-riddled plates.

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Nyck de Vries’ journey through the modern motor sport ecosystem has been neither smooth nor conventional, for he clawed his way to Formula 1 via talent, charm and graft; he shone brilliantly but fleetingly; he was swiftly and unceremoniously rejected by it; then he found not only success but also glory elsewhere. First he was jettisoned by McLaren – despite having been identified by that team’s bigwigs Ron Dennis and Martin Whitmarsh as a prodigious young talent and despite having won multiple karting and feeder series championships – and he was later discarded by AlphaTauri after just 10 grands prix, a timeframe that many commentators at the time regarded as unfairly brutal and brutally unfair. I was one of them.

Yet perhaps the single most impressive aspect of de Vries’ career is that every apparent dead end has somehow become another road ahead. His life story is not therefore one of failure interrupted by success, or even of success flecked with failure, but of a roller-coaster pilgrimage fuelled by unshakeable ambition, burning resilience and indefatigable resourcefulness. Rarely have I seen such determination packed into such a compact, wiry, lissome, albeit powerful frame. For the record, he stands just 5ft 5in (1.68m).

Young karting champion poses with trophy and helmet.

Winner of the Karting World Championship in 2010, and Nyck de Vries repeated the feat in ’11

Getty Images

“I grew up in a family in which racing was a passion – my father’s passion specifically, I should say. He [Hendrik Jan de Vries] was an amateur racer. He raced Renault 5 Turbos, Renault Spiders and Formula Renaults, and when I was born [in February 1995] he was quite soon very keen to share his passion with his son and to continue to live his racing dream through me. So he bought a go-kart for me when I was five years old, and I first drove that go-kart on the parking lot of one of his car dealerships, because his business was selling Renaults. So I never really had a chance to consider anything other than racing as a career, because I grew up with racing. Dad’s was a decent business, but obviously it couldn’t provide the earnings that would finance a trajectory to F1. With our resources we were able to do karting. We didn’t have the money to fund me in formula cars, no, but we had the passion and the background, which was and is important.”

Blue Lucozade-sponsored single-seater racing car taking a corner.

Racing in Formula Renault 2.0, 2012

Sutton, DPPI

That distinction matters. Motor sport grandees have often liked to tell themselves that ability rises naturally to the surface, but the truth is more complicated: ability requires opportunity, and opportunity requires resource. De Vries’ career therefore had to be built on something other than money. It was duly assembled by commitment, sacrifice and a father’s and son’s willingness to keep pushing even when all the evidence suggested that their task was becoming almost too formidable.

Indeed, even young Nyck’s karting career was not initially the unstoppable march that it would soon become. “At national level we never really excelled. OK, we were always competitive, we were always finishing in the top three or the top five, but we never became Dutch champion or Belgian champion, for example. So I’d say that from age five to age 12 I always considered myself not mediocre but slightly in the background. We were putting in the hours, we were laying the foundations, but we weren’t harvesting. Yet, somehow, once we’d moved onto the European scene, which we might have expected to be a bigger challenge, it turned out to be the opposite. From age 13 to age 16, so from 2008 to 2011, we enjoyed a lot of success [he won the World Karting Championship in both 2010 and 2011].” When telling such stories he uses the word ‘we’ a lot – almost never ‘I’ – and often he means himself and his dad.

Drivers and officials pose with trophies at FIA prize gala.

From left: Yvan Muller, Sebastian Vettel, FIA president Jean Todt, Sébastien Loeb, de Vries, Andrea Bertolini and Michael Bartels – champions in 2010

Sutton, DPPI

His surge through international karting arrived at precisely the moment when F1 teams were rediscovering the value of investing in young talent, because Lewis Hamilton’s rise through McLaren’s Young Driver Development Programme had provided a compelling example of what could happen when a team identified a driver early and nurtured him with energy and care. “Lewis made his F1 debut with McLaren in 2007, and that was a big success story, especially when they won the F1 World Championship together in 2008. However, F1 at that time wasn’t as financially buoyant as it is now. A couple of teams were making money; the majority were actually losing money. So there wasn’t much money available to invest in junior driver programmes, but I think McLaren’s success with Lewis reignited other F1 teams’ interest in investing in young talent, and that timing was very handy for me because that was the exact moment when I was starting to win and kind of dominate in karting.

FIA Formula 2 podium ceremony with three drivers holding trophies.

de Vries, left, sharing the F2 2018 Barcelona GP podium with George Russell and Lando Norris

DPPI, Getty Images

“So there was a lot of interest in me from various F1 teams and F1 driver management groups at that time. I’m not exactly sure how my first meeting with McLaren was organised but I remember that it was in 2009, and, because I’d raced in one of the kart teams that Lewis had raced in before, the connection was probably made via Lewis’s dad [Anthony Hamilton] and Martin Whitmarsh [the McLaren team principal]. We were delighted to sign with McLaren and we decided to work with McLaren on mapping out my future. A year later Ron Dennis [McLaren chairman] began to take an interest in my career development, too.”

McLaren represented not only a backer but also a bridge between talent and destiny. For a driver from a normal family, that support was transformational. It enabled de Vries to climb the traditional ladder through Formula Renault 2.0, Formula Renault 3.5, GP3 and Formula 2: the essential proving grounds in which so many hopefuls either establish themselves or disappear.

Renault Sport single-seater racing through a sweeping corner.

A win and a fourth place in A win and a fourth place in Formula Renault 2.0’s opening two rounds at Aragon in 2014 was the start of a championship-winning season

DPPI

“I’d say that 70% of my costs were covered by McLaren, which was great, because without that I wouldn’t have been able to do all those feeder series. But after McLaren’s F1 World Championship success of 2008, with Lewis, things began to decline for them a bit, a few of their sponsor-partners began to leave, and F1 wasn’t yet enjoying the commercial explosion that it’s enjoying today. As a result it became less straightforward for an F1 team, even a big and famous one like McLaren, to be a profitable franchise. So their focus inevitably shifted to different areas – like F1 car performance, quite understandably – and putting money into a young driver wasn’t seen as a priority.

“I grew up in a family in which racing was a passion – my father’s passion specifically”

“Then, as the years rolled by, Martin left [in mid-2014], Ron left [in late 2016], and eventually the financial support that I’d always had from McLaren came to an end. It didn’t mean the end of our relationship, because we continued to work together for two more years – and actually I’m doing some work for them again now, as it happens, which is great – but I obviously had a tough time after I lost McLaren’s financial backing. So those were challenging years, character-building years, because now I had to fight my own battles.”

Formula 2 champion celebrates with the 2019 championship trophy.

From left: Formula 2 title winner, 2019

DPPI, Getty Images

For many drivers, that would have been the point at which the dream began to fade. A driver can win races, impress engineers and demonstrate genuine potential, yet still find himself or herself without the budget required to continue. De Vries’ career was a case in point and he duly entered a period during which survival became the immediate objective, and F1 – once his sole focus – began to look increasingly unreachable.

“I understood very quickly that, without McLaren’s financial backing, my path to my ultimate goal – F1 – had suddenly become a lot longer than I’d anticipated. In the winter of 2016 to 2017, for example, I had nothing lined up, nothing at all. I’d tested for Audi in DTM in December 2016 and that looked like it was going to go ahead, and I actually thought I was going to end up going in a touring cars direction. But then Audi withdrew from the World Endurance Championship and suddenly they had plenty of ex-WEC drivers available to fill their DTM seats, so that ended that possibility.

Mercedes Formula E car racing on a street circuit.

Another title arrived in 2021, racing for Mercedes in Formula E – with de Vries taking the crown in the first of a season-ending Berlin double-header

LAT Images

“Then Ferrari reached out because they wanted a replacement for Gianmaria Bruni in their WEC team. They organised a shootout at Vallelunga, on my birthday [February 6, 2017] actually, which went very well, and that dialogue went all the way to the point that we exchanged contracts.

“But in the background I was still pushing for an F2 drive, because I knew that F2 should be my priority target, and it wasn’t until late February 2017 that I finally got an F2 seat sorted, with Rapax. I had only a third of the necessary budget but I decided to take a risk, go ahead anyway, and see how it developed. But, obviously, starting a season with only a third of the budget, I mean, you know you’re going to face trouble very soon.

“If you want to excel in anything in life, you need to dig deep and overcome tough obstacles”

“But my philosophy at the time was: if I step away from the F2-to-F1 direction now – and do DTM or WEC or something – I’ll never be able to get back, and at 22 I felt I was too young to give up on my F1 dream. So I continued to look for backing wherever I could find it, and in the end I managed to get backing from [Indonesian fast food mogul] Ricardo Gelael. The following year, 2018, his son Sean, who’s a good friend of mine, raced with me in F2 for Prema, and again the Gelael family helped me out. Then in 2019 I raced in F2 for ART. But those years – 2016, 2017 and 2018 – were very tough. It felt like live or die, and after a while I stopped even dreaming about F1. All I was trying to do – desperately – was find the money to continue in F2. To be honest, the Gelael family saved my career, and I’ll always be grateful to them for that.”

There is a particular kind of resilience required to remain committed to a dream after that very dream has become almost too painful to contemplate. De Vries’ career during those years was not fuelled by fantasy; rather, it was powered by fortitude. He was no longer expecting the straight route to F1 that all junior champions hope for. Instead, he was fighting simply to remain on the road. Nonetheless, when I ask him whether he now looks back on that period and recognises how truly remarkable it was that he was able, without the assistance of a manager, to find the funding to keep his career alive, he is characteristically measured. There is pride, but no vanity.

Red Pertamina Formula 2 car racing around a circuit.

De Vries spent three seasons in Formula 2, 2017-19, finishing fourth as a Prema driver in ’18

DPPI

“I’ll humbly say that I’m proud of it. But I’m also aware that if you want to excel in anything in life, you need to dig deep, you need to overcome tough obstacles and you need to be strong, and I know I’ll have harder battles to fight in the future. But, yes, I’m definitely proud of it and it definitely shaped me. Having said that, I wouldn’t say I was completely alone. I still had my dad, because he was always pushing me, even though he didn’t really know how to get me to F1.”

That final point is revealing. Nyck’s father could and did provide love and encouragement, but rare indeed is the family that can navigate the political stumbling blocks that litter the road to F1. I guess an example of that rarity is the role that Keke Rosberg played for his son Nico, which required the 1982 F1 world champion to provide for his son time, expertise, energy, contacts and money. Or, to put it another way, achieving success in motor sport has long been about finding the optimal blend of speed and circumstance, and de Vries’ arrival at the top level would require both.

When he won the 2019 F2 championship with ART, he had achieved what every aspiring F1 driver is told he must achieve. Yet the reward that often if not always follows F2 success – an immediate promotion to F1 – did not in his case arrive. Was he gutted about that, I wonder? “Not at all. I was realistic about it. I understood that there had been quite a few F2 graduates to F1 recently, so there was likely to be very little opportunity for me at that particular time – and, frankly speaking, if I’d won the F2 championship a bit earlier, rather than in my third year in the series, I might well have been able to force my way into F1 earlier, but for many reasons that didn’t happen. So, actually, my focus in terms of sourcing a drive for 2020 was still on alternatives to F1.”

Williams Formula 1 car races around a circuit.

his dream came true, making his F1 debut in the 2022 Italian GP at Monza

LAT Images, Grand Prix Photo

There is no bitterness in the way he recounts that turn of events – and here we encounter two of the most striking things about the de Vries mindset: he is able to acknowledge disappointment without allowing disappointment to define him, and he is able to pick himself up after a setback and get going again. “But what I did do, F1-wise, was start doing simulator work for Mercedes, which was organised by [Mercedes talent scout] Gwen Lagrue and George Russell, who was already in F1 at Williams. That then led to me winning a place in the Mercedes Formula E team. I had a meeting with Toto Wolff and he was very clear. He made no promises beyond Formula E whatsoever and I felt like that direction was the right step for me at the time. Also, having now moved totally away from McLaren, I was able to embrace Mercedes fully, and I trusted them and I felt that, via my work in their F1 simulator and via my racing in their Formula E team, I was growing into the Mercedes family.”

“I’d accepted that F1 was probably never going to happen for me. Now suddenly it was happening”

The irony is that the detour away from F1 became one of the most important chapters of his development. Formula E was not a consolation prize; it was a championship in which he learned a different kind of racing intelligence, one that demanded precision, adaptability and strategic awareness. It also produced the kind of results that could not be ignored. “You’re being a bit modest,” I venture. “You weren’t merely racing in Mercedes’ Formula E team – you won the Formula E championship in 2020/2021, with wins at Riyadh and Valencia, and you won two more Formula E races the following season, at Riyadh again and Berlin.”

“That’s right, I did,” he replies, allowing himself a bashful chuckle. It is an unusually unadorned remark in response to a question about a major achievement, but perhaps that simplicity is revealing, for de Vries has always been more interested in the work than in the applause. Not surprisingly, he quickly moves on. “Yes – and, which was great, during that time I was given the opportunity to test the Mercedes F1 car, at the end of the 2020 season, in Abu Dhabi, then I was made Mercedes F1 reserve driver for 2021, then I got the opportunity to do three F1 practice sessions in 2022, for Williams in Barcelona, for Mercedes at Paul Ricard and for Aston Martin at Monza.”

Racing driver celebrates on the podium with champagne.

De Vries’ 2021 win in Formula E caught the attention of F1 teams

LAT Images, Grand Prix Photo

Monza was the big pivot, I suggest. “Yes – because Alex Albon got appendicitis, so I was selected to race his Williams.” The circumstances were unusual, perhaps almost cinematic. A driver who had spent years waiting for an apparently immovable door to budge suddenly found one flung wide-open right in front of him when another driver fell temporarily ill. What is more, he delivered: he finished ninth, scoring points on his F1 debut.

Mercedes head honcho Toto Wolff was unstinting in his praise: “What else could he have done in terms of performance than what he’s shown today? He had no training, he jumped straight into FP3 in a car that he hadn’t driven before, and I think that really showed what he’s capable of doing. We perhaps forget how he dominated in F2, and he was absolutely great when he won the Formula E championship.”

“I knew what the Red Bull and AlphaTauri culture was like: swim or sink, hit or miss, all or nothing”

Williams team principal Jost Capito’s summary was briefer but no less glowing: “He did a great job, fantastic in fact, and he so much deserved this chance.”

“It was a big mix of emotions,” says de Vries now, four years later. “I’d done free practice with Aston Martin on the Friday, then the call from Williams came the following morning. Coincidentally, my father was in Monaco that weekend, so when he found out on the Saturday that I’d be making my F1 debut he drove from Monaco to Monza to watch me. When I saw him in the F1 paddock, we both became a bit emotional. It was just a very special moment. We both recognised that at last we were about to fulfil our F1 dream but, in addition to the emotion, I also felt so very grateful for the chance.”

AlphaTauri Formula 1 car riding over a circuit kerb.

By 2023, de Vries was with AlphaTauri in Formula 1 but points were difficult to find – finishing 17th here in Austria. The British GP was next

Hans Lucas/AFP Via Getty Images, DPPI

The image of Nyck’s father driving from Monaco to Monza, fuelled by devotion, pride and hope, is to my mind an almost perfect symbol of their entire journey together: the parent who bought the first kart, believed in his son before there was evidence and arrived just in time to witness their jointly nurtured dream finally become reality. “To be honest, I had my future kind of set out in Formula E and I’d accepted that F1 was probably never going to happen for me, but now suddenly it was happening, via this unexpected gift. I was about to live my F1 dream. Then my debut F1 race went well – I finished ninth – and I was over the moon and on cloud nine if it’s possible to be in both those places at the same time, and I started receiving a lot of really nice WhatsApp messages. But, quite quickly, I also realised that this was my moment to turn this gift into a real shot at my dream, which was F1. In other words, I realised that I had a chance to capitalise. So the enjoyment was actually pretty brief because on the Monday after the race I went back to my laptop and phone and started working.”

“I don’t want to sit here and say we were amazing, or even that we did well, but it all fell into place”

That final sentence tells you as much about de Vries as does any result sheet. Even at the highest emotional point of his career (theretofore) he was already thinking about the next challenge. The F1 dream had arrived unexpectedly, but keeping it alive would require the same qualities that had carried him through every previous setback. “There were only a few 2023 F1 seats left and, although I’d raced well for Williams at Monza in 2022, Williams wasn’t really an option for me because they had American ownership [New York-based private investment firm Dorilton Capital] and they were very keen to run an American driver [Logan Sargeant, from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, duly got the drive]. Pierre Gasly wanted to leave AlphaTauri [which he did, joining Alpine for 2023] and Red Bull didn’t really have on their books an obvious successor to take his AlphaTauri seat. So there was an opportunity for me. And, looking back, I can only be grateful for that opportunity, to race for AlphaTauri, and to live my F1 dream.”

The opportunity was real, but F1 is an unforgiving place and the same intensity that allows hard-nosed teams to win world championships can also create a ruthless environment for drivers attempting to establish themselves. “Unfortunately it didn’t work out and it ended prematurely, but not every chapter in life can be successful,” says de Vries with a shrug. “I guess it’s sad for me personally that the one opportunity that I was looking forward to the most ended up being so short-lived, but I have no regrets or ill feelings towards anyone at Red Bull or AlphaTauri. They gave me a chance. Different people have different ways of working, different approaches and different philosophies, and Red Bull and AlphaTauri expect strong performance straight away. That’s their approach, that’s their philosophy, and in my case that strong performance simply didn’t come quickly enough. OK, the AlphaTauri car – the package – wasn’t competitive, so that made things harder, and in addition to that let’s just say that we didn’t have the right chemistry, so it didn’t work out. That’s kind of it. There’s not much more to say.”

Toyota endurance racing car celebrates victory with drivers.

Le Mans 24 Hours 2026 winner for Toyota, with Mike Conway, left, and Kamui Kobayashi driving; it was de Vries’ seventh appearance at La Sarthe

Hans Lucas/AFP Via Getty Images, DPPI

It is difficult not to admire the maturity of that answer, not least because of course there is in fact a lot more to say. Many drivers would feel deeply wounded after losing an F1 seat after only 10 grands prix, especially after spending so much time and effort fighting for the chance to occupy one. De Vries instead chooses perspective. He does not disguise the disappointment, but neither does he allow it to become resentment.

“Say what you like, Nyck, but I really don’t think you were given enough of a chance,” I half ask and half insist.

“Well, you’re entitled to your opinion, but what I’ve said is what I truly feel. They gave me a chance and it didn’t work out. OK, could they have given me a longer chance, and might things have then played out differently? Maybe, but they do things their way, they’ve won many F1 world championships, and it’s worked for them. Do I personally support such an approach? I don’t know. I guess if I was running an F1 team, I’d probably do it differently. For example, I think the Kimi Antonelli example is amazing because it demonstrates a very different approach and philosophy to bringing on and supporting young talent, and that’s the Mercedes way, and it’s clearly working, but there’s not only one road that leads to Rome. So I respect the Mercedes approach and philosophy, and I respect the Red Bull and AlphaTauri approach and philosophy, too. And when my time at AlphaTauri came to an end [after the 2023 British Grand Prix], I was almost relieved to be released from it, in a way.”

Ten races is a very small sample via which to judge any driver, particularly one entering F1 after years away from the traditional feeder-series-to-F1 conveyor belt. Whether more time would have changed the outcome is impossible to know. It might have done, I suggest. “OK, but if I’m very honest, I’m not sure whether I’d have excelled within that environment anyway, even if I’d been given all 22 races. But I think I knew that, going in. I knew what the Red Bull and AlphaTauri culture was like: swim or sink, hit or miss, all or nothing. I accepted it because it was the only chance for me to fulfil my F1 dream. So I have no regrets, honestly, and I firmly believe that everything in life happens for a reason.”

So, once again, he rebuilt. There is a pattern to de Vries’ career that becomes increasingly clear with every chapter: the setback arrives, the disappointment is absorbed, then the work begins again. “Toyota had been kind of with me from 2020, because when I started informally with Mercedes I also signed a test and reserve driver agreement with Toyota’s WEC team. Oh and, by the way, that’s another example of the great support that Mercedes offered me, to give me the freedom to have a link and an affiliation with Toyota, and they did that because they [Mercedes] believe that racing drivers absolutely need to drive. In other words, if a test and reserve driver gets track time in real cars, not only in simulators, it’s to everyone’s benefit.

Toyota drivers celebrate a Le Mans victory on their car.

From left: Conway, Kobayashi and de Vries, Le Mans 2026; Nyck has been racing Hypercars for three seasons with Toyota

Getty Images, LAT

“So I became a test and reserve driver for Toyota’s WEC team, alongside my Mercedes F1 test and reserve driver duties and my racing for Mercedes in Formula E. I actually did a rookie test in Toyota’s WEC car at the end of 2019 [in Bahrain]. After that I gradually started integrating into the Toyota WEC team and organisation, and it soon became clear that their objective was eventually to promote me to a race seat. And even when I got my surprise chance to race in F1 with AlphaTauri in 2023, they [Toyota] said, ‘Don’t worry, we want the best for you, but if things don’t work out for you in Formula 1 we’ll be ready to welcome you back very happily.’ That kind of support was something I really valued.”

That word, support, appears repeatedly when de Vries discusses the organisations that have mattered most to him. For all the emphasis in motor sport on machinery, technology and engineering excellence, he believes that performance is ultimately a human equation. “Definitely – and when things ended for me in F1, we [de Vries and Toyota] were already in touch, and I knew that I wanted to be working with people like them. I felt that Toyota offered the right environment for me because they offered the support that I value. I think that’s really important. In many high-level sports, every athlete, every player and every driver is so good that the differences are very much in the small details, which include the environment to perform at a top level consistently. I think many sportsmen and sportswomen are good, but the ones that are really good are able to maintain a level of excellence consistently, and a lot of that is dependent on being mentally confident and in a good psychological place.”

That philosophy was rewarded this year at Le Mans, where de Vries finally achieved endurance racing’s ultimate prize. “Obviously, it’s one of the most prestigious races of them all – along with the Monaco Grand Prix and the Indy 500. Every driver knows that from a young age. I’d raced at Le Mans in LMP2 in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 – not for Toyota – so my first Le Mans in the Toyota Hypercar was in 2024, and we came quite close [de Vries finished second, driving alongside Kamui Kobayashi and José María López]. Then, last year, 2025, we weren’t quite competitive enough [de Vries finished fifth, driving alongside Kobayashi and Mike Conway], and this year it happened [alongside Kobayashi and Conway again].”

Mahindra Formula E car racing through a wet circuit.

De Vries won one of the two Tokyo ePrix races in July and was one of nine drivers in contention for the title going into the London finale

Getty Images, LAT

It did indeed happen, but the victory was not straightforward. Few Le Mans wins ever are. Instead, it unfolded as a dramatic story of survival, timing and patience. “It was exhausting, not so much from an energy point of view but from an emotional point of view. It was a real roller-coaster of emotions. For a long time we thought we were out of contention for the win – then, suddenly, with four or five hours to go, a safety car brought the whole field together and it became a sprint finish. I did the penultimate stint, which was the stint during which we took the lead. And when it came to the final stint, I found that I just couldn’t watch the TV footage and I put my phone away. So I went into my driver’s room, I lay on my bed and I stared at the ceiling. Then, just three minutes before the end of the race, I walked to the garage, we were still leading, and we won.”

“Did you cry?” I ask.

“Oh yes, I did, I did. I’m not ashamed to admit it. I was consumed by this absolutely overwhelming feeling, because I knew that these people [Toyota] had supported me for so long, and we’d trusted one another with total mutual commitment through all that time. They say you don’t choose Le Mans; Le Mans chooses you. I 100% want to acknowledge that that’s the absolute truth, because I wouldn’t even call it luck, but everything needs to go your way, to fall into place in the right way, and that’s what happened for us this year. I don’t want to sit here and say that we were amazing, or even that we did well, but rather that it all just fell into place, and I’m so grateful that after many good years and a few bad years, and such a variety of different experiences in racing, I can now look back and say, well, I won world karting championships, I won Formula Renault championships, I won a Formula 2 championship, I won a Formula E championship, I won Le Mans and I raced in F1. So it’s not too bad.”

Related article

Few racing careers follow a perfectly straight line; fewer still contain such a remarkable collection of achievements gathered across so many different disciplines. De Vries has won races in karting, Formula Renault 2.0, Formula Renault 3.5, GP3, Formula 2, Formula E, European Le Mans Series and the WEC. He has driven in F1, and his F1 debut was one of the best we have seen this century. He has experienced uncertainty, disappointment and rejection, but also triumphs that most drivers can only dream about. “Racing has been my whole life, I’ve loved it, and I still love it. Even so, I’m only 31, and I feel like I’m only just beginning, so I’m very motivated to keep racing for many years and to try to win a lot more. That’s what good racing drivers do, so that’s what I want to focus on doing for as long as possible, hopefully in WEC and Formula E.”

The most remarkable aspect of Nyck de Vries’ life story may not be that he reached Formula 1, although F1 had always been his dream. It may not even be that he emerged from that brief, bruising experience with his reputation intact and his ambition undiminished, although that, too, was and is both notable and laudable. No, in my view the most remarkable aspect of Nyck de Vries’ life story is that, through every change of direction, every uncertain winter, and every bad day when the sport seemed to be slamming a door firmly shut in his face, he continued to adapt, he continued to learn, he continued to remotivate, and as a result he continued to race. So in other words, the Nyck de Vries story is not about the opportunities he missed, but about the opportunities he created.

Racing driver adjusts a white balaclava before a session.

CV

Born: 6/2/1995 Friesland, Netherlands

● 2000-11 Karting; twice winner of FIA Karting World Championship (2010-11); signs with McLaren in 2009.
● 2012-14 Moves to Formula Renault 2.0 (R-ace; Koiranen); takes two titles in 2014.
● 2015 Formula Renault 3.5 (DAMS, 3rd).
● 2016 GP3 (ART, 6th).
● 2017-19 Moves to Formula 2 – 7th in ’2017, 4th in 2018, winner in 2019 with ART.
● 2018-20 WEC LMP2, including Le Mans 24 Hours 2019 (15th).
● 2019-22 To Formula E with Mercedes – wins championship in 2021.
● 2020-23 F1 reserve driver 2020-22, F1 debut with Williams in Italian GP (9th). Seat at AlphaTauri for 2023; sacked after Round 10 British GP – best result, 12th Monaco.
● 2023-26 Return to Formula E with Mahindra – best season 2026 (7th).
● 2024-26 Drives for Toyota in WEC Hypercar; wins 2026 Le Mans 24 Hours.

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

The ground has barely stopped shaking. Eyes are streaming from the lingering nitromethane and car alarms are going off around the paddock, leaving the fans lining the Santa Pod Raceway grandstand and grass bank cheering. It’s the spectacle they all came to see: Top Fuel Dragsters. Measuring 25ft and deploying 11,000hp from a supercharged 8.2-litre V8 to hit 60mph in half a second, they don’t so much bend the laws of physics as beat them into submission.

Two dragsters race side by side at Santa Pod Raceway

These flame-belching behemoths are the headline act of the European Finals, the closing round in the 2026 FIA Drag Racing Championship. After trips to Tierp in Sweden and Germany’s Hockenheimring, a return visit to Bedfordshire in mid-September is the last major fixture on the Santa Pod calendar in the year the venue celebrates its 60th anniversary.

At its most basic, the premise of straight-line drag racing is simple. The person who crosses the line first progresses into the next heat. Second place packs up and goes home. But, particularly with Top Fuel Dragsters and their similarly potent, front-mid-engined Nitro Funny Car cousins, there’s so much more to the craft than merely stamping on the throttle as the massive rear tyres fight for their life. The art is in fine-tuning clutch engagement so that it slips the optimum amount for the duration of the run. Rather than the forces of acceleration tailing off as speeds climb, these cars continue to gather pace at an even more rapid rate to the finish line. Only then does the onboard radio receiver instruct the parachutes to deploy.

Dragster launches with flames at Santa Pod Raceway

Rain meant lengthy delays for drag racing’s finale, with cars not able to take to the asphalt until 4.30pm

When weather conditions allow, spectators wait little more than a minute for each pair of cars or motorbikes to take to the dragstrip. But for the individual teams, there’s hours separating their heats as the event cycles through a 300-strong entry list. Crews feverishly spend the gap inspecting the mechanicals and programming set-up. Then it’s over to the driver to reward that hard work.

They must nail their burnout to heat the tyres, rapidly react to the Christmas tree-style starting lights, and fire themselves at the horizon. Chasing perfection – that’s what irreversibly gets under competitors’ skin.

Santa Pod drag strip beneath the iconic overhead sign

Track staff preparing the course

Flying the flag for the large contingent of Nordic racers and 40-plus female entrants, Susanne Callin successfully defended her Top Fuel crown. On the meeting’s final day, rain-delayed by seven hours, the Swede’s lightning-fast reflexes enabled her to pip Switzerland’s Jndia Erbacher in the two-car Elimination round on the way to 280.4mph over 1000ft.

A call to local residents granted permission for Santa Pod to extend its curfew from 8.30pm to 9pm, helping regain lost track time. Kevin Kent had already converted his pre-event points advantage into Nitro Funny Car title glory, before he launched his Ford Mustang silhouette in 4.28sec at 286.58mph. In the well-populated Pro Modified class – for supercharged, turbocharged and naturally aspirated nitrous oxide-injected V8 machinery sporting conventional opening doors – Andres Arnover set the benchmark Elimination time by 0.008sec. His 1967 Ford Mustang required just 5.829sec to complete a quarter-mile course.

Santa Pod drag racing action, spectators and pit crew in a four-image collage

Clockwise from top left: Cortina estate; big turnout; fire at will; Kevin Kent’s Mustang, bodywork raised


Susanne Callin beside her Top Fuel Dragster at Santa Pod

Susanne Callin Top Fuel Dragster No1

A limited number of European dragstrips, quadrupling costs post-pandemic and long lead times while parts are freighted from the United States means private testing of a Top Fuel Dragster is virtually unheard of this side of the Atlantic. As such, even two-time top-flight champion Susanne Callin still isn’t fully used to the physical onslaught of launching one of these machines: “Nothing comes close. The car never stops accelerating. If you’re not feeling like you’re being shot out of a cannon, you know it’s not going to be a good run.” Callin resumed her racing career in 2019 after a 14-year pause to start a family: “I was definitely apprehensive about coming back in case I’d lost my touch and ruined my reputation. But it’s so addictive. Once I’d done my first run, I had that hit and was totally sucked in again.”

Dragster wheel with Norwegian flag and racing control panel

From left: some of the leading drag stars are Scandinavians; Burner on, reactor on, flux generator… fluxing


Junior Dragsters gathered at Santa Pod Raceway

Lola-Belle No15 & Frankie Kent No19 Junior Dragster

Nitro Funny Car champion Kevin Kent was previously a crew member for another team. He then bought his own vehicle and has dominated the British scene since. Seeking to establish a family drag-racing dynasty, his children Lola-Belle and Frankie race Junior Dragsters – a category sponsored handsomely by Carl Cox, see below. Purpose-built for aspirants aged eight to 17, the cars battle it out over one-eighth of a mile in 8-12sec.

Dragster parachutes and large racing slick tire

From left: parachutes at the back of a car; tyres are run at low pressures to maximise grip, with the tyre creasing under the force of acceleration


Drag racing team member at Santa Pod Raceway

Carl Cox Ford Capri No6209

He’s a dance music superstar DJ and a committed drag racer. Yet Carl Cox’s hearing is somehow fine. He’s hugely popular in the paddock, partly down to his fame and personality, but mainly for giving a lot to the discipline – backing young talent and offering a £20,000 prize per round plus zero entry fees to those in his Five90 series (that’s the target time): “I got hooked on drag racing in Australia. By 2009, I had built three 10sec cars. But I wanted to go quicker. I started out at Santa Pod, so I’m bringing it back full circle.” He had to leave early on the final day to resume his residency that evening at an Ibiza nightclub.

Two dragsters racing down the Santa Pod strip

Past 300mph, you need more than brakes to slow and keep the car straight


Graham Sykes beside the Force of Nature steam rocket bike

Graham Sykes Force of Nature

“I was inspired by Evel Knievel. I watched the broadcast live when he tried to jump Snake River Canyon in Idaho in 1974. It’s been a worm in my head ever since.” That’s precision engineer Graham Sykes’s reply when asked what possessed him to build Force of Nature, a steam-rocket bike. It takes three hours to heat 120 litres of water to 250˚C. And it’s all over in a flash. Quicker off the blocks than a Top Fuel Dragster, Sykes hits 60mph in an astonishing 0.4sec.

Dragster steering wheel and dashboard controls

You won’t be turning much using this steering wheel – it’s used for small corrections on the track, while the ‘loud pedal’ for acceleration is usually on the right of the footbox


Super Comp dragster at Santa Pod Raceway

Leah Kellett DSR Dragster No1

College studies and opening a salon delayed Leah Kellett’s start in drag racing, when her younger brother Joe was busy winning four titles in a single season. Now a six-time champion in the Super Comp category – where the aim is to consistently hit an 8.9sec run – she’s raising money for Macmillan Cancer Support and Breast Cancer Now. Diagnosed in 2024, Kellett asked the doctors two questions: “Am I going to go bald and can I still race? Competing was my focus. I made sure my chemotherapy was on a Tuesday, so I was all right by the weekend.”

Ford Fiesta drag car on the Santa Pod start line

The fastest Ford Fiesta in town – Chris Todd’s 2-litre Fiestaroo in the Racing Comp Eliminator


Santa Pod dragster launches with flames on the strip

Firestorm / FireForce 5

If there’s a category of vehicle that can rattle windowpanes more violently than a Top Fuel Dragster, then it’s a jet car. The European Finals pitched the Pratt & Whitney Sikorsky Skycrane helicopter engine of FireForce 5 against the General Electric Northrop F-5 turbojet in Firestorm. Long-time Santa Pod crowd pleaser Martin Hill lit the afterburner on FireForce 5 to break 269mph.


Drag car engine and turbocharger at Santa Pod

Mark Sheridan Plymouth Barracuda No534

As the name implies, the Street Eliminator division accommodates road-legal cars. Naturally, that means a valid MOT, tax and insurance. Competitors must also complete a 20-mile roundtrip on nearby roads, fill up at a petrol station and restart their engine. Mark Sheridan bought his Plymouth Barracuda in 1985 for £500 to make a quick profit. Four decades on, it houses a twin-turbocharged 8.5-litre V8. The sweltering UK summer prompted a brake fire while driving on the public roads. Handily, a passing window cleaner helped extinguish the flames.

B&M Pro Bandit drag racing shifter

B&M Pro Bandit gated race shifter, designed for dragsters


Red Pro Modified Chevrolet Camaro launching at Santa Pod

Andy Robinson Chevrolet Camaro No101

When Andy Robinson isn’t preparing multi-million-pound race cars for the Goodwood Revival grids, installing rollcages into McLaren F1 GTRs or fabricating spaceframe chassis for his Santa Pod rivals, he’s found at the wheel of his Chevrolet Camaro in the Pro Modified class. He bagged a 10th Motorsport UK championship crown; no one else has more than two.


Drag racer beside a dashboard with racing gauges

Bernard Saz Citroën DS No405

On his step up to the Pro Modified class for the European Finals, Bernard Saz pilots a Citroën DS silhouette. Not the most aerodynamic shape, but still an improvement over his previous Traction Avant. When the helmet is off, the Andorran is a proud Christian. He completed a nine-month walk this year from his home in Dijon to Jerusalem.


Silver Mazda RX-7 launching at Santa Pod Raceway

Nathan Bartolo Mazda RX-7 No71

Against the thundering big-block American V8s, the Mazda RX-7 of Nathan Bartolo provided a shriller soundtrack. Competing in the Super Pro ET category, where drivers must post a time between 6.0-8.99sec, the Maltese runs with a nitrous oxide-boosted 1308cc high-revving rotary engine.


Drag car launching in front of a packed Santa Pod crowd

Michel Tooren Chevrolet Camaro No1971

On the opening day of the European Finals, Michel Tooren posted a continental record for the fastest-ever time set by a supercharged Pro Modified car, powering his Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 across the line in 5.72sec at 239.93mph. Quite an achievement, considering he’s a drag racer by chance. He was initially a main sponsor of Pro Dutch Racing before its driver fell terminally ill. Not wanting to see the team fall apart, he hopped aboard in 2016.


Revells dragster launching at Santa Pod Raceway

Roz Prior, Top Fuel car, 1975 – she had sponsorship from Revell model kits

Stuart Bradbury

Cometh the horsepower

This year, Santa Pod celebrates 60 years of being the UK’s drag-racing centre. Here’s its story, from its time as an American base for B-17 bombers to jet dragsters, Bug Jams and Funny Cars

A former military airbase reborn as an international motor sport venue. It sounds like a familiar tale but unlike closest Midlands neighbours Silverstone and Bedford Autodrome, there’s no pesky corners peeling off a disused runway at Santa Pod Raceway. Instead, since 1966, it has been the heartland for straight-line speed junkies in the UK and Europe.

Europe’s first permanent drag strip breathed new life into the RAF Podington site. Opened in 1942, the base was seconded to the United States Army Air Forces. Numerous squadrons were posted there during the first year. Then the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress heavy bombers arrived, requiring the runways to be extended. Most prominently, from September 1943, it was home to the 92nd Bombardment Group for almost 300 missions.

Santa Pod start-line crew and drag racing action from 1968-69

From left: startline crew c.1969-70; Hustler launching in 1967 at the original startline

Roger Gorringe

RAF Podington was decommissioned in 1947 and devolved into a storage facility. Politicians queried the money being spent guarding millions of sandbags, leading to a private sale. It was at risk of being torn up entirely until a group of drag racers, led by John Bennett, intervened in 1964. Finally, on April 10, 1966, modern-day Santa (named after the first US drag strip, Southern California’s Santa Ana Drags) Pod Raceway opened for business.

The startline moved back in 1968 when a section of runway was excavated to provide hardcore for a motorway – the current course used to make up the pit area. Then leading European and American competitors arrived, as did jet dragsters. Now, more accessible Run What Ya Brung events enable the public to push their road cars to the limit, Bug Jam caters for all things Volkswagen, and drift days mean there’s still the occasional sideways action.

1973 Santa Pod drag race with historic military aircraft photo

From left: Don Schumacher, left, vs Paula Murphy, 1973 – the first full-on American Nitro Funny Cars brought to the UK; 92nd Bombardment Group

Peter Quinn

The FIA European Finals celebrated Santa Pod’s 60th anniversary and 30 years since the venue was bought by current owner Keith Bartlett. Yet there are still reminders of its war past, beyond the path set by the old airstrip. Although the hangars are long gone, the perimeter roads can still be traced, the air traffic control tower has been converted into a private house and several storage buildings remain – albeit returning to earth.

Two years after literally blowing the windows out of the startline gantry, Sammy Miller set the four-wheeled Santa Pod record in 1984. He launched his rocket-powered Vanishing Point Funny Car down the quarter-mile stretch in 3.58sec at a reported 386.23mph. That’s unlikely to be surpassed.

In keeping with its Stateside cousins, Santa Pod was resurfaced over the winter of 2017-18 from grippier asphalt (laid in 1972) to true RAF Podington-style concrete for greater consistency off the line.

Even so, the starring Top Fuel Dragsters easily outgun the B-17’s top speed of 300mph and 4800hp output. They’re generating more than twice that figure, nudging 320mph and buzzing the timing line in under 4sec. MK

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Scott Dixon and Will Power were both born in Queensland, Australia, separated by about 75 miles and 222 days spanning 1980 into ’81. When they encountered closed doors on the ladder to Formula 1, their talents took them to America, where they emerged as the greatest IndyCar drivers of the 21st century.

Dixon’s 60 race wins and six championships place him second only to AJ Foyt on the IndyCar pantheon. Power is the sport’s all-time leader with 71 pole positions; his 45 wins rank him fourth and he has claimed two championships. They have each tasted victory once in the Indianapolis 500 – Dixon in 2008 and Power 10 years later.

Both enjoyed extraordinarily long careers with IndyCar racing’s premier teams and their opportunities came under unusual circumstances. Toyota helped place Dixon with Chip Ganassi Racing midway through the 2002 CART season when PWR (nee PacWest) Racing shut down; he’s wrapping up his 25th and final year with the team before making a fresh start with Arrow McLaren in 2027. Power was tapped by Team Penske as a temporary replacement for Hélio Castroneves in 2009 when the Brazilian was on trial for US tax evasion. He converted that cameo as a substitute into a 17-year run with Roger Penske’s organisation before switching camps to Andretti Global this year.

Will Power in Verizon Honda racing suit and Scott Dixon in Target Honda uniform holding trophies amid confetti after IndyCar victory celebration

Penske’s Will Power and Ganassi’s Scott Dixon, 2012; five wins between them took these drivers to second and third in that year’s standings

Getty Images

Ron and Glenys Dixon were short track racers who emigrated to New Zealand when Scott was a toddler. He was in karts by the time he was eight and advanced through the Australian open-wheel ladder in record time. The Dixons were plotting a move to England when a network of Down Under racing legends including Kenny Smith and Vern Schuppan helped Scott land a ride in Indy Lights (the top CART feeder series) for 1999 with a new team organised by former F1 racer Stefan Johansson.

After a successful rookie Lights campaign in which the 18-year-old scored a victory on the Chicago Motor Speedway oval, Johansson shuttered the team, took over as Dixon’s manager in a role he still holds, and negotiated a multi-year deal with PacWest that would hopefully take Dixon into the CART series after another year in Lights. Another New Zealander – Paul ‘Ziggy’ Harcus, now a key member of the Andretti Global IndyCar team – ran the PacWest Lights programme.

Red No.3 Bosch Goodyear IndyCar with American flag helmet leads green No.87 Quaker State car on curved racetrack

Dixon’s first season in Indy Lights was 1999; he’d win the series in 2000

LAT, Sutton, Getty Images

“We had a Formula 3 test planned with Alan Docking and were ready to move to Europe, but we cancelled the test,” Dixon recalls. “The PacWest thing was a complete gift, to be honest. It was a big deal, and obviously it was a storybook year as well, winning half the races and dominating the Lights championship. That ultimately landed a ride on the CART side of the team, which we were hoping would be for many years. Unfortunately, it dissolved within another year and a half.”

“Chip had his hands full with a two-car team and they were doing well”

Dixon made a strong impression in his rookie IndyCar season with PacWest, taking a tactical fuel-saving win at Nazareth Speedway in 2001 and notching two other podiums. When attempts to reorganise the PWR team failed, he was fortunate to land with Ganassi three races into 2002.

“It wasn’t something Chip was looking for,” Dixon remarks. “He had his hands full with a two-car team with Bruno Junqueira and Kenny Bräck and they were doing extremely well. Because we had test teams and that kind of stuff in those days, they were able to piece something together. They had people they could utilise, but ultimately somebody had to pay for it and that was Toyota. I’m extremely thankful for what they did, for sure.”

Will Power celebrates Lehigh Valley Grand Prix win in blue red white POWERWARE Panasonic racing suit holding trophy beside portrait of driver in cream AVON Tyres suit

From left: Dixon, victor at Nazareth, 2001; Power, British F3, 2004

LAT, Sutton, Getty Images

Power’s father Bob was also an open-wheel racer, advancing to Australian F2. Power spent two years racing in British F3 – the latter, ironically, with Alan Docking Racing – and was competing in the Formula Renault 3.5 Series in 2005 when he got an opportunity in the Champ Car World Series late in the year. Craig Gore created Team Australia in conjunction with Walker Racing to place Australian drivers in Champ Car. When efforts to groom Marcus Marshall and the crash-prone Josh Hunt (who gained the nickname ‘Joe Shunt’) didn’t pan out, Power got the call to drive the Champ Car race on Australia’s Gold Coast.

He impressed to earn a full-time ride with Team Australia and was a regular top five runner in 2006 before winning twice and finishing fourth in the ’07 Champ Car standings. He and Justin Wilson of Newman/Haas Racing looked like the favourites for the 2008 Champ Car crown, but the series was merged into the Indy Racing League after the season opening Long Beach Grand Prix – which Power won.

White No.5 Bosch Formula race car cornering with front wheel lifted over red white blue curb

Power took second place at Thruxton in the 2003 British F3 championship and there’d be five podiums the following season

LAT, Sutton, Getty Images

Dixon had already made the transition from CART to the IRL when Ganassi switched in 2003. Remarkably, he won the all-oval IRL championship that first year, benefiting from the fact that CART (and Indy Lights) featured a mix of road racing and ovals.

“It was a lot of fun, but a very big unknown,” Dixon recalls. “Started with a bang, getting the first win at Homestead. Then having six DNFs and still winning a championship was almost insane. Doesn’t happen anymore – if you have two, you’re almost out of the top 10. That year we just had crazy speed. Most of the races, if we didn’t crash out or have a reliability issue, we were fighting for a win.”

“Different car, different series, and you’ve got all these ovals”

Dixon then struggled through two years with uncompetitive Toyota engines before reclaiming his winning ways in 2006. He had a new team-mate in the form of Dan Wheldon, who proved to be a valuable resource in Dixon’s maturation as a driver. Dixon dominated the 2008 IRL season for his second championship.

Blue white red POWERWARE Panasonic Firestone IndyCar front view racing at speed on track

Indy Lights champ Dixon moved to IndyCar for 2001, taking a win and a podium

Getty Images, Sutton

“Teaming up with Dan was pretty rough at the start; we didn’t really see eye to eye,” Dixon relates. “But halfway through the first year in ’06, we were best friends and it was so much fun to work together. His style and attention to detail, especially on mile-and-a-half ovals and superspeedways, was really unmatched. Then, 2008 was a wild year. I think any year where you win the championship and the Indy 500 is unmatched. That’s the two goals that anybody has for any kind of IndyCar series, so to do that was pretty special.”

“I used to tease Dario like he was grandma-like, going to get groceries”

While Dixon was winning six races and the 2008 IRL championship, Power was one of the lucky few Champ Car drivers who landed on their feet as Team Australia committed to the unified series. The IRL had introduced a few road races to its all-oval format in 2005, but in ’08, 11 of 17 races were still on ovals. Power, who had never run an oval race in his life, was thrown in at the deep end.

oyota racing driver holds a trophy above his head.

Victory at Homestead in 2003 – on his way to the title

Getty Images, Sutton

“That third year in Champ Car was going to be a great year,” he reflects. “We were just starting to get poles and wins and suddenly it’s a completely different car, completely different series, and you’ve got to do all these ovals. That was an incredibly difficult year for me. On the road and street courses, I had a ton of potential. But just with the pressure of having to perform to keep my ride, I made mistakes. I finished that season with really not anywhere to go. I was talking to Dreyer & Reinbold, and then the Hélio Castroneves tax indictment came up and there was an opportunity to fill in at Penske while he was still on trial.”

“Mario is 86 and I know in his mind he’s like, ‘I could race today and win’”

Thrown a career lifeline by Team Penske, Power started and finished sixth at St Petersburg, then qualified on pole at Long Beach and finished second to Dario Franchitti, who was Dixon’s new team-mate at Ganassi. Castroneves was acquitted of his tax charges and returned during the Long Beach weekend, but Penske gave Power four more races, including the Indianapolis 500. He won at Edmonton but broke his back when T-boned by another car over a blind brow at Sonoma Raceway late in the season.

Yellow green No.25 Formula 3 race car navigating corner with curbing at speed

Power was with Team Australia in Champ Cars at the end of 2005

Getty Images, Sutton

Still, Penske expanded to three cars to bring Power in full-time in 2010, and he finished second in the championship for the next three years, faltering in the oval season finale each time. Dixon finished third each of those three years, from which two championships were claimed by Franchitti. Dixon then went on a tear, winning championships in 2013, ’15 and ’18, and Power is convinced Dixon emerged stronger from his five years alongside Franchitti.

Will Power in green yellow Honda WPS racing suit celebrates with raised finger gesture and red cap

IndyCar win at Long Beach, 2008, driving for KV Racing

Getty Images, Sutton

“I saw him make a jump and he became this incredibly consistent driver,” Power observes. “Always finishing and no matter what situation, he always maximises it.”

“Dario was a different style,” Dixon responds with a laugh. “I used to tease him like he was very grandma-like, like he was going to get groceries at the shopping mall! It was just an eye-opener to see how good he was in any discipline, even down to fuel saving, tyre prep, all that kind of stuff. Dario was one of the most well-rounded drivers I ever came across.”

Will Power in black white red No.12 Verizon Pennzoil Shell Chevrolet IndyCar racing at speed and celebrating with raised hands

From left: Following a trio of runner-up places (2010-12) and a fourth (2013) in the standings, a title arrived for Power in 2014; 2018 Indy 500 winner

Getty Images, Indycar

In the midst of Dixon’s hot streak, Power finally claimed an IndyCar championship in 2014 and then tasted victory in the 2018 Indianapolis 500. Power never finished lower than fifth in the standings between 2010 and 2020; Dixon ended a season out of the top four only twice in that same period. Dixon’s sixth and most recent championship came in 2020, meaning that he won championships in five different iterations of the IndyCar formula.

Related article

Four years after Power had achieved the dream of winning Indianapolis, he won a second IndyCar championship in 2022 with a single victory, after racking up 14 race wins during his three-year run of close calls from 2010-12. But his life then took a serious turn when his wife Liz spent a long period of time in hospital with a life-threatening staph infection. In the first half of 2023, Power considered retiring, concerned for the welfare of his young son Beau.

“After my win rate and all the poles, to go and have a super consistent year and win another championship later in my career was really satisfying,” Power says. “But the next year was terrible. Liz all but died. Beau’s future weighed heavily on me. I felt like I was still as quick as I had ever been and still good enough. I knew I hadn’t got the results with that stuff going on, but I knew I was still capable of winning.

“Then Liz recovered and 2024 was a strong year – I won three races. It was so unfortunate to have a seatbelt fail in the last two races because we were capable of winning that championship. Such a pity.”

Will Power in white black red No.12 Verizon Hitachi Chevrolet IndyCar battles Scott Dixon in orange blue No.9 PNC Bank Honda on racetrack

Mid-Ohio, 2019 – Power, nearest, was on pole but Dixon (No9) won

Getty Images, IndyCar

Power finished fourth in the ’24 standings, but Penske refused to negotiate an extension to his contract. After the Australian won a round late in the ’25 season at Portland, Penske made a one-year offer that Power rejected, choosing instead to sign a multi-year agreement with Andretti. Power was 11th in this year’s standings.

“I looked forward to the challenge,” he says. “I thought, ‘These guys have great cars on street courses, they do win races,’ and you can see there was room for improvement as well. And they’re only three years into where they’ve had the budget and resources that Penske and Ganassi had. It seemed like a very good place to go. And I was right. I’ve really enjoyed it. We’ve had some serious pace in a lot of places. As bad as the end result looks, we’ve been up there.”

Scott Dixon celebrates 2013 IZOD IndyCar Series championship at Auto Club Speedway with trophy and team beside orange blue No.9 PNC Bank Honda cornering on track

From left: a sixth title for Dixon, 2020; Dixon’s third title

Getty Images, Indycar

Meanwhile, Dixon reveals that he nearly moved to McLaren as early as 2019. He admits that Power’s shift to Andretti this year impacted him.

“Maybe Will was a little bit of inspiration, having talked to him and seeing the excitement that he’s had working with different people,” Dixon says. “Will and I had our ups and downs throughout the years. Definitely different personalities, and probably quite opposite in the way that we achieve race wins or championships, which makes for great rivalries. But he’s a good dude. He can be very fiery. He can be very reactive. He’s got a good heart and I love his fierce, competitive nature. He will go down as one of the greatest drivers that IndyCar has seen and his straight-up speed is unmatched. For me to be able to compete through that era with him is fantastic.”

They were never close, and they had only one major flare-up. At Sonoma in 2013, Penske crewman Travis Law (who now manages the Porsche Penske Motorsport sports car programme) intentionally balked Dixon during a pitstop, trying to assist Castroneves in a championship battle that ultimately resolved in Dixon’s favour. But Power is equally effusive about Dixon.

Scott Dixon in blue PNC Bank Chip Ganassi Racing Honda suit with orange cap during IndyCar team portrait

Dixon’s tally of six IndyCar championships puts him among American motor racing’s best, with just AJ Foyt above him

Joe Skibinski, Lat

“Scott is a great person,” Power notes. “It sucked that I never got to fight him head-to-head for a championship because I raced him for years. Incredibly trustworthy on the track, and if he’s leading, he’s probably one of the most difficult guys to get by or force an error out of him. He’s had a great career and obviously I don’t have to say he’s one of the best drivers of our era.”

Dixon turned 46 in July, and Power will follow suit in March. How much fuel is left in the tank for these 21st century legends of IndyCar racing? Can they mount one more challenge to Álex Palou, the sport’s dominant driver in the current era?

“It’s changed a little,” Dixon admits. “It’s probably more of a young man’s game now than ever. For me, it’s always the basics of, ‘Are you enjoying it? Are you competitive? Do you still really want to win?’ Mario is 86 and I know in his mind, he’s like, ‘I could race today and win this race,’ which is phenomenal. I love that passion.

Will Power in black yellow TWG Honda Sparco racing suit adjusts earphones before IndyCar race

Power, at 45, is eight months younger than Dixon; both were without wins in 2026 – Power had five podiums, Dixon one

Joe Skibinski, LAT

“I think the runway could be quite long at McLaren. We all know that we’re not jumping because the grass is greener; at this level, all the teams are very good and well-matched. But I’m looking forward to it and excited for a new chapter.”

Veteran IndyCar driver in red white black Texaco Ford Gillette Motorcraft racing suit with arms crossed portrait

Getty Images

Too many miles on the clock?

Here are US racing’s time-defying dudes

IndyCar icons have traditionally had longer careers than Formula 1 or even sports car aces. Mario Andretti ran close to the front the longest; he contended the CART championship through 1988 when he scored the penultimate of his 52 race wins at Cleveland. He won one last time aged 53 at Phoenix in 1993, below, and reluctantly retired at the end of ’94, although he continued to race sports cars through to the 2000 Le Mans 24 Hours, at 60.

AJ Foyt was 43 when he claimed his last full-field IndyCar win at Silverstone in 1978. He racked up six more wins through 1981 against a diminished USAC field to bring his total to a record 67 and continued to compete until retiring at 58 prior to 1993 Indianapolis 500 qualifying.

Vintage red No.14 Gilmore Racing Team IndyCar with exposed engine and rear wing driven at speed

AJ Foyt, 43, was still winning USAC races with Gilmore in ’78

Getty Images

Gordon Johncock’s superb three-win 1982 campaign at 45 was his last season as a frontrunner but he contested Indianapolis for another decade. Bobby Unser won Indy in 1981 at 47 and stepped away from driving at the year’s end; his brother Al triumphed at Indy in ’87 five days short of his 48th birthday and he kept running the 500 through to 1993, taking third in ’92. At 48, Johnny Rutherford eked out one last win at Michigan in 1986 but failed to qualify at Indianapolis from 1989 until calling it quits prior to the ’94 race.

The gold standard is Rick Mears, who recognised he was losing his desire and walked away at 41; Michael Andretti was 40 when he stopped racing full-time and switched to team ownership.

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Back in 1974 Porsche created the 911 Carrera RSR Turbo 2.1. Despite being the Stuttgart firm’s first ever 911 turbo racer, it finished second overall at Le Mans beating every sports prototype bar one. Powered by a 2.1-litre flat six developing 500bhp, it was a lightweight 815kg monster, devastatingly effective straight out of the box.

Cars such as the RSR Turbo helped forge the early reputation of turbo-boosted cars as wild, lairy machines. And almost ever since it’s been about taming them, finding ways to eradicate the lag, soften the boost. Fifty years of development on, and Porsche’s own 911 Turbo S road car now has electric motors to help spin its turbos. It’s a remarkable piece of engineering, but in many ways does its best to conceal the fact it has turbos at all.

Gunther Werks Turbo showing exhaust, engine and driver details

Clockwise from top: In track mode, output is 850bhp; Four-litre twin-turbo engine is still air-cooled. Looks like a work of art, behaves like a monster; There’s carbon fibre on the exterior too; Carbon fibre bucket seats are Gunther Werks’ design

The Gunther Werks Turbo isn’t like that. This is a car that harks straight back to the good old days of turbos, when lag was huge and thrust was hard. Gunther Werks doesn’t particularly cite the RSR Turbo as inspiration but it legitimately could. Like the OG, its flat six is air-cooled and only has two valves per cylinder. But then: a pair of chunky turbos, rather than a single and, at 4 litres, almost double the engine capacity.

The 992.2 Turbo S we mentioned earlier has 701bhp. The Gunther Werks Turbo has 850bhp. It weighs 1230kg. Explosive doesn’t really cover it. That RSR had a colossal power-to-weight ratio, 613bhp/tonne. The latest Turbo S can ‘only’ muster 406bhp/tonne. Here it’s 690bhp/tonne.

Every restomod firm needs a USP, especially one restoring and modifying Porsche 911s given how many use that as their starting point. Well, there aren’t many others sending cars out the door with this much power. Or more – earlier this year Gunther Werks launched the F-26 which, on E85 fuel, develops 1067bhp. I drove it. It was terrifyingly brilliant, perhaps the most intense road car with a roof I’ve handled.

The Turbo was the starting point for the F-26, the car where California-based Gunther Werks realised they’d perhaps gone a bit too far and if they wanted to go further they’d have to re-engineer the whole chassis. So what’s what it did for the F-26, fitting double wishbone front suspension, rose-jointing it all round for better control, upping chassis rigidity yet further.

Gunther Werks Turbo with racing seats and large rear wing

Clockwise from top: Wing mirror arms are 3D printed; Revs to nearly 8000rpm and hits 60mph in 3secs; Six-speed manual gearbox; Turbo wing at the rear, although a ducktail is available

“This is a car that harks straight back to the good old days of turbos, when lag was huge”

The Turbo doesn’t have the same level of polish. It’s more wayward, wilder and feels more like an old 911. You find yourself driving around the flaws, being wary of the short wheelbase, the lift-off, the lag, the boost, everything really. The main method of coping with 850bhp is the tyres, enormously wide 335s at the rear, 295s at the front (which restrict steering lock considerably). This is not a chassis car, it’s a power car where the rest has to cope.

Besides the tyres, stiff springs and JZM dampers try their best to control wheel movements. I’d argue its all a bit too stiff. Even with the dampers in Comfort mode, the Turbo feels rigid on the road, the wide rubber chasing cambers and tugging at the steering. Those tyres make a din too, so long journeys are tough; fuel thirst is prodigious.

Gunther Werks Turbo dashboard, rear wheel and engine details

Clockwise from top: Naturally the rev dial is central; speedometer up to 200mph – which this will reach; A firm ride on road and track, although those wide tyres make a racket; The price is a little over £700,000; 18in five-spoke classic wheel design gives a ’70s touch

“Bespoke carbon body panels are fitted, making the 993 look like an older 911, giving that race vibe”

Because of the short, wide stance, the rear-mounted engine and the firm suspension, the chassis has a small sweet spot. Too much speed into corners and the front stumbles over itself into understeer, too little and you’ll want to accelerate mid-corner, which could go one of two ways depending on how the turbos are feeling. Long story short, keep corners and straights very separate, just be patient and wait to unleash the hit. The anticipation is worth it.

The start point for all of Gunther Werks’ conversions is a 993-generation 911, the whole thing stripped back, reinforced and rebuilt from the ground up. Bespoke carbon body panels are fitted, making the 993 look like an older 911, giving it that race vibe. It’s not as gorgeously detailed or as aesthetically pleasing as one of Singer’s recreations, but Gunther Werks has found its niche.

Gunther Werks Turbo driven on a country road

Inside, the race theme continues. There’s a titanium rollcage, a carbon-fibre plinth covers the rear compartment, the seats (Gunther Werks’ own design) are single-piece carbon buckets with a removable headrest pad to give more space for a helmet. And yet despite all this it’s not really a track car. What it is, is a fairground ride. It’s a car for quick, addictive hits. To go out to a quiet road and remind yourself what it feels like when the rev counter swings past 3500rpm and for the next 3500rpm you’re basically along for the ride, fingers curled like claws around the steering wheel.

Gunther Werks Turbo shown from the front

“There’s so much enjoyment to be had just hearing the turbos start to gust and fizz”

The powertrain is a triumph, just so much fun to use. Yes, you need to be careful with it, but that’s what makes it exciting, the knowledge that you could overdo it if you prod too hard at the hornet’s nest. There is a motor sport traction control there to save you from the turbos’ worst excesses, but it’s not a full stability control system. You have to take responsibility – a fact that is rammed home by the presence of a manual gearbox. Open gate, tight shift, lovely clicks and clacks, the perfect way to access the power, the deep, chuntering soundtrack and fury.

Because you don’t have to max it out all the time – there’s so much enjoyment to be had just hearing the turbos start to gust and fizz, lifting off for the overrun barrage, the flat six rumble and churn. Mechanically it feels really robust (Gunther Werks backs it up with a five-year, 100,000-mile warranty), like a period piece rather than a new car. I like that the cabin’s modern touches, the USB slots and CarPlay-equipped hi-fi, are hidden away.

Gunther Werks Turbo interior beside its side profile

From left: Cabin blends new and old, with Apple CarPlay, USBs and an integrated phone holder; Just 75 examples will be made

It costs $950,000 (£705,000) before you add options, way more than a standard £200,000 Turbo S which would show it a clean pair of heels on a good road, usefully less than the $1.5m (£1.15m) charged for an F-26. But for sheer cling-on-for-dear-life excitement, there’s not much to touch it. We’ve done so well at taming turbos, we’ve forgotten how thrilling they can be. The Gunther Werks Turbo reminds us.

GUNTHER WERKS TURBO

  • ENGINE 4 litres, twin turbo, rear-wheel drive
  • CHASSIS Donor 993, reinforced
  • BODY Carbon front fenders, rear quarter panels, skirts, roof, front hood, front bumper, rear bumper, rear wing, rear duck tail (optional)
  • TRANSMISSION Getrag six-speed manual
  • SUSPENSION Bespoke JZM/TracTive adaptive suspension, remote reservoir adjustable dampers
  • POWER 850bhp (track mode)
  • WEIGHT 1230kg
Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

YIn 1931 Barbara Cartland organised an all-female motoring event at Brooklands. British Movietone News had been there in November 1931 to capture the action of the Society Ladies’ Private Handicap; or perhaps, more accurately, to convey the impression that it had happened at all.

It was Barbara’s first time in front of a movie camera; her first experience of hearing her recorded voice, and it shows. “At a party at my house,” she says, shifting her weight from one leg to another, “a man suggested that women could not drive as well as men. I replied that on the contrary, I could find nine amateurs who could drive extremely well. The whole idea has developed into a race and I believe and hope there is a good prize.”

Black-and-white portrait of a woman wearing pearls

Barbara Cartland, writer and socialite

Getty Images

She does not name the man, but the true driving force behind the event was Edward Russell, Lord de Clifford, road safety campaigner and ardent British fascist, who had gained notoriety for marrying Dorothy Meyrick, the daughter of a notorious nightclub hostess. Lady Dorothy was in one of the cars, as was her sister, Mary, wife of the Earl of Kinnoull. (Their mother, Kate Meyrick, did not attend the race, as she was serving a sentence in Holloway Prison for running a Soho drinking and gambling joint without a licence.)

Barbara found it hard to gather sufficient drivers for the event, but one of her pageant stalwarts obliged. Princess George Imeretinsky, who had personified the Golden Arrow boat train in Barbara’s railway-themed pageant, and Green at her Superstitions ball, climbed into an MG and put her foot on the pedal. Footage shows the event being declared in her favour: she then reflects on the outcome, giving the strong impression that she is addressing a crowd.

They were not there. Nothing that could be termed a genuine race took place. The press, however, reported otherwise, explaining that the only experienced driver among them, Joan Chetwynd, “made a gallant effort to overtake the leader, and only failed to win by a few feet”.

Woman in a pink dress and feathered hat

Cutting tape at Brooklands’ Barbara Cartland Room

It was Chetwynd, stung by this report, who gave Barbara’s game away. The Motor magazine published an exposé denouncing the event as fraudulent and chaotic.

“When the starter’s flag fell,” it reported, “all the cars, with the exception of one, which stalled because its handbrake was still on, tore down the finishing straight and began cutting each other up in a most alarming fashion for the benefit of the cameras.”

Lord de Clifford gave up racing four years later, after being acquitted of the manslaughter of a motorist with whom he was in a head-on collision while driving on the wrong side of the road. The verdict was controversial: he was the last member of the House of Lords to be tried by his peers. He later sold dog food door-to-door.

Book cover featuring an elderly woman beneath a parasol

The Great Dictator: A Life of Barbara Cartland by Matthew Sweet is out now (Hodder & Stoughton, £25).

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

In September 1905, Hugh Locke King and his wife Ethel undertook a motoring tour to Italy with a plan to see the Coppa Brescia race, subsequently better known as the Coppa Florio. The winner was Giovanni Raggio driving an Itala. The Locke Kings had purchased a 50/70hp Itala car themselves in August that had finished second in the touring class of the Mont Cenis Hill Climb in France. As it had incurred some damage to the bodywork during the event, they had ordered a new body to be made and fitted to the car in Paris, so collection of the repaired vehicle became part of their tour. Both Hugh and his wife were keen early motoring enthusiasts, although on this journey they were beset with mechanical problems and an accident that delayed their arrival in Italy, causing them to miss the race.

In their accommodation the night after the race they met some Italian drivers who had taken part in the event and were recounting their exploits, and enjoyed sharing stories of previous races. There were no English entrants in the Coppa, the drivers mainly French, German and Italian.

Female racer pictured in early Brooklands racing attire

Ethel Locke King led the parade on the circuit’s launch

Getty Images

“The idea of the course dawned in Brescia after the Targa Florio meeting, as I sat among the owners of the French, German and Italian cars which had been competing,” said Hugh. “In reply to my question why there was not a single English car entered, the reply came quickly and unanimously: ‘You have no practice in racing, no cars with the speed – you would not have had a chance.’ He added ruefully, ‘Poor old England! – the cradle of sports as she used to be called – nowhere. Cars, men, all were ‘made abroad’.”

Hugh Locke King was stung by the comments. The drivers were right. Great Britain had a blanket speed limit of 20mph on its roads and all motor racing was banned. There were also no facilities for testing the few cars that the country produced. Continental countries had embraced motor cars and motor sport far more enthusiastically, literally leaving Great Britain in the dust, something he felt ashamed about. France alone was producing 50% of all the world’s motor vehicles at the time.

Map of Brooklands motor racing circuit and aerodrome layout

Colonel Henry Capel Lofft Holden, a British Army officer, designed the track layout; he’d been chairman of the Royal Automobile Club, 1904-05

Alamy Stock

On their return journey to Great Britain, the Locke Kings discussed the implications of what they had heard and made a plan. Hugh and Ethel could foresee a future in which Great Britain would take a lead in this new sport and they decided that they could be instrumental in bringing this about. Back at home in Surrey, they walked round their substantial estate and decided that a racing circuit could be built on its grounds. As ideas went it was a big one and it was the genesis of what was to become Brooklands Motor Racing Circuit: a remarkably grand vision.

Hugh sought advice in the world of motoring. The secretary of the Automobile Club, Julian Orde, welcomed the idea and suggested that a circular track should be built so that racing cars could always be seen by spectators. He also proposed a narrow track and envisaged that it could cope with maximum speeds of 60mph.

With the Automobile Club supportive, Hugh didn’t hesitate on starting the project and, after Lord Montagu of Beaulieu wrote an article in favour of the project in The Car on July 25, 1906, trees were already being felled on the Locke King estate in preparation for the work to start, although no firm design plans had been drawn up.

In September 1906 Hugh organised a meeting of the leading sporting motorists of the day at his house. Two well-known figures who attended were Charles Jarrott, who was an experienced European open road racer, and SF Edge, who had won the 1902 Gordon Bennett Cup for the race from Paris to Innsbruck.

“The terrain lay in a ’swampy, rabbit-infested corner of Surrey’”

The meeting was very positive and, having inspected the possible location for the track, it was proposed that this should be four miles long and wide enough for 10 to 12 cars to drive abreast. After the meeting, Edge said that he would like to book the track as soon as it was finished as he wanted to attempt driving at 60mph for 24 hours. This was duly agreed as it would mean great publicity for the new circuit.

Most of the surrounding land that was to be transformed by the project had been in the Locke King family for generations. It was a quiet area of rural Surrey at the time and the neighbours could not have foreseen the disruption that the building of this motoring amphitheatre would cause, let alone the noise that the circuit would generate when in use.

Brooklands opening day social gathering with dignitaries in formal attire

Dame Ethel, photographed in 1933, was a formidable character, taking over the reins of the Brooklands construction project

Brooklands Museum

Shortly after the meeting that effectively kick-started the building of Brooklands, Hugh appointed Colonel HCL Holden chief engineer and designer of the new motor circuit. He was a prominent member of the Automobile Club and the first chairman of its new competitions committee. He had good technical knowledge and an understanding of high-speed dynamics.

He visited the site on several occasions and explained that the best approach to the design of the circuit was to include banked curves that would enable cars to travel as fast as 90mph. It was a revolutionary approach, but he was certain that the banking would allow cars to maintain maximum speeds without skidding.

Dame Ethel was closely involved in all the discussions; she shared her husband’s enthusiasm for the ambitious project and was to play a crucial part in the development of the track. Hugh also arranged for a distant relative, Ernst, Baron de Rodakowski, to help with the Brooklands enterprise.

Holden’s initial layout plans showed a 2½-mile oval track and estimated a three-month construction period. Rodakowski became the first clerk of the course until his role was taken over by Major Lindsay Lloyd in November 1908. He had helped the Locke Kings with the luxury Mena House Hotel situated at the base of the Pyramids in Giza, which they owned from 1886. During his time as its manager from 1887-96, it gained great prominence among the European social elite.

Much of the engineering needed to be innovative to deal with the terrain of the estate, which lay in a “swampy, rabbit-infested corner of Surrey”. What the track should be surfaced with engendered much debate. A new material, tarmacadam, was deemed to be untested and difficult to roll on the banked surface areas that were planned. Asphalt also seemed to present a problem as it would need the extra cost of a concrete base. After much discussion it was decided that a single layer of concrete to a depth of 6in would be the best option. It could be laid in small sections and made using materials from the local gravel quarry.

“People will view the construction of a racecourse with horror”

A railway engineer, Alexander Donaldson, was engaged to manage the growing number of contractors that would be needed to complete the work as there were considerable challenges faced in the building of what was to be officially called Brooklands (sharing the name of the Locke Kings’ house). Hugh’s first estimate of the budget required for the construction of Brooklands was £22,004, which he felt he could comfortably draw from liquid assets. Donaldson immediately doubled this budget figure when he had finished his first rough estimate of costs.

Things started to move quickly when Messrs Price and Reeves were appointed as main contractors and they soon came back with their own budget figure of over £60,000. Work forged ahead in spite of there being no consensus on what everything would actually cost.

An additional 1500 men employed by Price and Reeves bolstered the team of 500 farm labourers who had started the estate clearance. Most of the work was manual, supported by the use of two light locomotives and about 90 wagons operating on eight miles of railway line that had been laid within the confines of the outline track.

Brooklands circuit construction with steam excavator and railway tracks

A pair of locomotives running on eight miles of rail track assisted the construction of the site

Getty Images

The look of the estate changed quickly during 1906 as over 30 acres of woodland were felled, 300,000 cubic yards of earth shifted and 200,000 tons of concrete laid. It is no wonder that the Surrey Herald of September 1906 commented, “the people of Weybridge will view the construction of a racecourse in their midst with horror and aversion, and no good can possibly derive from such an institution”.

The scale of the project was immense and it was to prove stressful and detrimental to Hugh’s health. His patriotic vision of a home for motor racing and the provision of testing facilities for the development of British cars was to be one for which he made great personal and financial sacrifices. Without the role that his wife was to play in the circuit’s development, it seems unlikely that Brooklands would ever have been completed.

“Ethel was a furious driver. Everyone got out of her way”

Ethel was definitely the first lady of Brooklands. As Hugh’s health declined, she stepped up from being a partner in the project to overseeing and managing all aspects of the epic endeavour. Aside from the ambitious scale of the circuit construction, there was the rapidly deteriorating financial situation that the Locke Kings had to manage as the ever-growing budget projections threatened certain bankruptcy. In fact, Hugh at this stage handed all these worries to his wife.

Ethel was clearly up to the job and cleverly managed discussions and financial agreements with the banks. Loans were arranged, creditors assuaged as much as possible and, when push came to shove, she did not hesitate to approach members of her wider family to ask for loans or donations to enable her to both service the growing number of loans and pay off debts. Many of the estate’s properties were mortgaged to raise necessary cash. Her approach was firm and when Donaldson’s £43,000 estimate of the cost of building the track was received, Ethel immediately wrote to Rodakowski pointing out the huge increase was unacceptable without discussion. She promptly followed up by calling at Carlton House, Regent Street, the headquarters of the newly formed Brooklands Automobile Racing Club, to speak to him in person. It was the first of a number of terse and often combative discussions between the two.

Ethel had been very hands-on in the management of the estate’s properties and the farms that they owned, and she now also demonstrated a calm and clear head for business. She was a strong, independent character and was respected by the men she had to deal with. As her husband’s health deteriorated, she took the reins on the project, balancing the books and guiding progress on the construction that would ensure the track opened in 1907 as planned.

Drivers in vintage Brooklands race car wearing goggles and helmets

Just days after Brooklands’ opening, SF Edge, at the wheel, staged a 24-hour endurance drive

Getty Images

She was faced with tough decisions. It became clear when spending was at its highest that she had to consider stopping the construction of the track completely as she and Hugh faced possible financial ruin. The alternative was the brave decision to have faith in their original vision and risk all to complete the ambitious project. This is exactly what she did, and is the mark of a brave, clear-thinking woman without whom the Brooklands estate would have remained without a track that was to foster British motor racing, and then become home to aviation and manufacturing of aircraft critical to both future world wars.

Ethel was born in 1864 and her childhood was spent in Tasmania and Bermuda, where her father had been colonial governor. Returning to England, she met Hugh and was soon to be married to him. They had no children and devoted their time to running the Brooklands estate.

Writer and historian Antonia Scott, in an article for Community Life Magazines in March 2025, said of Ethel: “She was a strong character and a great lover of motor vehicles. You think of her as your classic society lady, but she’s just this incredible woman. She was really pivotal in having the track constructed. She was a forceful woman and very vibrant and generous.”

Brooklands construction workers with horse-drawn carts excavating track site

Early horsepower at Brooklands in October 1906 – 300,000 cubic yards of earth had to be shifted

Getty Images

Ironically, her husband, Hugh, didn’t enjoy driving and, although he had owned the fourth car registered in Great Britain, he engaged a driver and increasingly relied on Ethel to take the wheel. The year after the visit to the Coppa Florio, Ethel decided to buy a second Itala, which she christened Bambo; it was the car that had reputedly won the 1906 Coppa Florio race. Ethel was the true motoring enthusiast in the marriage at a time when seeing a female driver at the wheel of a car was something of a novelty; to see an Englishwoman on the roads of the continent on their 1905 trip to Italy would be a rare sight indeed. Her great nephew, Dr Frank Hanford, recalled: “She was a furious driver. Frightful. Everyone in Weybridge got out of the way.”

She was one of the first women to fly an aeroplane and very professionally managed what was to become the Brooklands Estate Company, the organisation responsible for the track, airfield and other projects. In name she shared this responsibility with her husband, but his withdrawal from the day-to-day activities and inability to cope with the stress of the huge building project meant that she was firmly at the helm of a much-troubled ship.

Towards the end of 1906, Brooklands Automobile Racing Club (BARC) was formed, made up by a group of distinguished men from the English aristocracy. Under the auspices of what was to become the RAC, the board included the Duke of Beaufort, Lord Northcliffe, the Duke of Westminster, Lord Montagu of Beaulieu and Lord Lonsdale. From their offices in Carlton Place, they planned how motor racing would take place for the first time in Great Britain, how races should be run, and how this new circuit was going to be a triumphant demonstration of British endeavour, attracting the best of international cars and drivers. Not completing the circuit on time was not an option at this stage and they, like Hugh Locke King, were also motivated by the thought that the Brooklands circuit could generate significant money from spectator attendances. Plans duly went ahead for an official opening in 1907.

Early 1900s race cars on Brooklands steep banked concrete track

The scale of the banking could be seen from the two shillings and sixpence (2/6) enclosure in summer 1907

Getty Images

The main outer circuit or oval was approximately 2.75 miles long and 100ft wide, and was to be primarily used for speed testing and record attempts. It featured two huge banked curves: the Members’ Banking (Home Banking) and Byfleet Banking. The banking reached nearly 30ft, with a maximum inclination of around 26.5 degrees that allowed cars to maintain high speeds without slowing down in the corners, assuming the car and the driver were up to this vertiginous challenge.

The Finishing Straight was a separate, additional section, approximately 0.5 miles long, that diverged from the oval at the ‘Fork’ near the River Wey crossing and passed the Clubhouse and grandstands, providing a grandstand finish (a tradition borrowed from horse racing). The Fork was a split in the track where a driver could continue on the outer oval or turn left onto the Finishing Straight. This junction was essential for the handicap races that were the staple of Brooklands.

Related article

The Earl of Lonsdale formally opened the new Brooklands circuit on Monday, June 17, 1907. It was remarkable that the track and the buildings were completed on time. It was testament to Ethel’s focused approach to getting the project finished as planned.

Apart from the track itself, there were facilities to support the racing that had also been constructed. The Clubhouse was the main administrative and social hub of the circuit and housed the clerk of the course’s office and all the necessary facilities needed by race officials. It was also home for the weighbridge and the clerk of the scales office where handicaps were worked out. There were changing rooms for drivers and a viewing stand for the press. With its green dome, it became the BARC’s central feature.

Crowds and vintage cars at Brooklands paddock and pavilion

The green-domed Clubhouse has been central to the Brooklands experience since 1907

Getty Images

The Paddock area was adjacent to the Clubhouse and accessible via the Competitors’ Tunnel. This was the focus for all the drivers and racing teams as this was where garages, ‘racing lock-ups’ as they were known, and workshops were based.

Various grandstands and enclosures were created for spectators, with areas on Members’ Hill near the Clubhouse and Finishing Straight to accommodate the crowds and provide a good view of the exciting conclusion to races.

At the opening ceremony, the Locke Kings hosted lunch in the BARC pavilion, a relatively formal affair, at which Hugh made a short speech. With business concluded, the assembled dignitaries moved to the Paddock, from where a procession of cars formed into two lines and drove on to the Members’ Banking, led by Ethel driving her husband in Bambo, which she had driven back from Italy. It was most fitting that the first lady of Brooklands took the lead after all the determined hard work she had put into securing the completion of the track and facilities. Her leading the procession was also a powerful statement: a woman was the first person to officially drive a motor car round a lap of Brooklands.

“It was testament to Ethel’s focused approach to getting the project finished as planned”

Prior to the opening, there had been mixed feelings about this behemoth now residing in rural Surrey. It is worth remembering that many still felt that the motor car was going to be a passing fad and the attraction of speed was overrated. The automobile trade, for the benefit of whom the notion of a bespoke testing and research facility was integral to the Locke Kings’ dream, had their doubts about its value and the huge amount of money that had been invested. They were at the time much more interested in selling imported foreign cars as Britain’s offerings really didn’t compare or catch the public’s attention. The press vacillated, and from initial reticence about the venture began to warm to the idea. The locals remained vociferous about the intrusion and the possible noise that would blight their lives once racing started.

Hugh Locke King reflected in his article in the souvenir programme of the circuit’s opening: “The Brooklands Track is open, and if we have been able to do anything to promote the well-being of the new sport and the new industry in this country, the anxiety and risk of this past year will have been amply repaid.” It was an earnest comment; the effort of building this motoring Colosseum, fighting planning battles and dealing with local residents’ complaints had nearly ruined Locke King’s health and finished him financially. Without the leadership and resilience of Ethel it could all have come to naught.

Brooklands Belles book cover showing women racers on track

Extract from Brooklands Belles: The Women Racers Who Took on the Men by TJ Hartwell (The History Press, £22.99).

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

The Formula 1 silly season was stopped in its tracks when, shortly before August’s Dutch GP, Red Bull confirmed that Max Verstappen will be on board until at least 2030. While it always seemed likely that the four-times world champion would stay put for 2027 – assuming that he didn’t retire and walk away from the top level of the sport – the length of the commitment beyond next season came as a surprise.

The deal was a testimony to the persuasive powers of principal Laurent Mekies. While the financial terms were hammered out by Verstappen’s management and Red Bull big wig Oliver Mintzlaff, none of that was relevant unless the man himself was convinced that the team will have a competitive package in the coming years. It says a lot that despite the tricky start to 2026 under the new regulations, and amid the challenge of fielding the in-house Ford power unit, Mekies has convinced Verstappen that everything will fall into place.

The Frenchman’s managerial skills have been much in evidence since he was thrust into the limelight in July 2025 as the chosen successor to Christian Horner. It was never going to be an easy task – after two decades in the job Horner was Red Bull Racing, not just to the outside world but to the hundreds of employees in the organisation. But one way or another he had outstayed his welcome, and the top brass in Austria wanted change. Mekies brought fresh eyes and a different approach for the post-Horner and Adrian Newey era, and he was tasked with steering the ship back on course in the wake of the off-track distractions of the previous year or so.

Red Bull team members gathered in the garage

By the start of the 2026 season, the spectre of Horner had gone

Getty Images

“The summary would probably be a roller-coaster,” he reckons of his initial stint in the job. “The first few weeks were quite difficult. Not so much for me because as much as you will be obviously shocked and surprised, it’s a lot more difficult for the people, for your people, to try to deal with the news. And it wasn’t the first news, so a roller-coaster. Once that first phase passed, the people have been incredible in opening the doors and putting everything on the table, and making me feel welcome.

“You have to deal with the emotions of your people and the public”

“The first few weeks and months were only about trying to meet as many of these guys, trying to know them, trying to understand how this team was functioning. And the reaction of the team through that second part of the year after the difficult first part of the season, with all the events that had happened, has been incredible to us.”

From nowhere, Verstappen became a regular race winner and title challenger: “Nobody wanted to give up on the ’25 season. They wanted to prove their points. I think Pierre [Waché, technical director] had never really given up on the title, even at the lowest point, and that’s the way he and his team were looking at the season. And slowly but surely, the car started to work a bit better. Different sweet spots were found, and more development was brought to the car.”

Red Bull driver and team executive signing documents

Max Verstappen extended his Red Bull contract in August

Getty Images

In the end, Verstappen lost out to Lando Norris at the final round. Mekies concedes that the effort expended compromised the start to this year’s programme.“We are rational people outside of the moment of emotion of the races,” he considers. “And the truth is the slow start of the ’26 season is a direct product of a) how late we pushed last year – and in some respects, you also see it with our friends at McLaren, and we probably pushed even later than they did last year – and b) being on year one of a phenomenal project, which is the engine project. If you put these two things together, are you surprised that you start 1-1.2sec off the pace? Probably not fully surprised.

“I think what remains incredible is that once again, because this team is quite famous for that, how quickly we have managed to close the gap. Now we are not at 1.2sec, we are probably at three-tenths, and these last three-tenths are going to be the most difficult ones. But I think it showed again the quality of the team, the chassis side, PU side, with that racing spirit to press on. In that context, you get the highs and the lows of the way back to the top.

Formula cars racing alongside a driver preparing in the cockpit

From left: Mekies was an intern with Signature in French F3 in 1999 – and remained in 2000; engine race engineer for Zsolt Baumgartner, Minardi, 2004

Getty, Lat

“Of course on the lows, you have to deal with the emotions of your drivers, your people and the public. That’s part of the game and I think we have to be honest with ourselves. If two weeks in a row you send your driver in the wall because of an issue with a car, you are going to get some emotions, regardless of where you are. We all have only one goal, it’s winning, and until we get there, we will not stop. As a team the only goal is winning, the drivers’ only goal is winning, and we push each other. And it’s a very direct relationship, and we want to keep it that way.”

But how did Mekies get here? His career path has been a series of carefully calculated steps, each adding to his knowledge and building up a remarkable CV.

“I’m lucky to have had the possibility to do so many jobs”

His interest in F1 was first sparked by watching races on TV with his father during the Senna/Prost era, and a visit to the 1988 French GP at Paul Ricard further fanned the flames of his passion. Looking for a way into the sport, Mekies opted for a mechanical engineering course at the prestigious ESTACA establishment in Paris. “At the time there was one university in France that was specifically close to motor racing,” he recalls. “The final year was done in the UK in Loughborough as an exchange programme, which was very advanced – they had a very nice automotive engineering department. And it allowed me to learn some words of English!”

That was followed by an internship with the Signature F3 team, whose main rivals included ASM, run by his future Ferrari colleague Fred Vasseur: “Signature was a 12-person team, something like that. I spent the 2000 season there. They were very good people and it was a very successful year – they won the French championship, they won Zandvoort [the Marlboro Masters]. It was a good way to learn.”

Orange Arrows Formula 1 car racing on track

Mekies had the same job with Enrique Bernoldi at Arrows, 2001

Dppi

After the internship, Mekies saw an ad for a vacancy at Asiatech, the organisation that took over Peugeot’s F1 engine programme for the 2001 season and concluded a deal to supply Arrows: “I just sent my CV and I had an interview very quickly, like 10 days after. I was very surprised, nearly shaken and incredibly I got the job. And three weeks after, I was at Silverstone at a test session with Arrows, understanding nothing of what these guys were saying! Add three weeks to that and we were at Melbourne.”

That year he worked with Jos Verstappen and Enrique Bernoldi, before Asiatech transferred to Paul Stoddart’s Minardi team, where Mekies was part of Mark Webber’s debut season. When Asiatech pulled the plug, he stayed on at Minardi. “On reflection, F1 being such a specialist job, a hyper-specialist job, I got lucky,” he laughs. “I got to work as an engine engineer at the start, then when I switched to Minardi, I did a little bit of engine engineering, a little bit of control engineering – this was the time of traction control and all this stuff – and then I became a race engineer. I’m lucky to have had the possibility to do so many jobs. I think the reason is that every job I was doing, I was really bad at it. They kept moving me until they found something I could do properly! Which is still to happen, hopefully soon…”

Formula 1 team member working with a headset

Minardi became Toro Rosso in 2006, with Mekies remaining – here at the 2007 Hungarian Grand Prix

Sutton

In 2006 the team morphed into Scuderia Toro Rosso thanks to an influx of investment from Red Bull. “It was like changing team but staying at the same place,” recalls Mekies. “A completely different adventure started when Red Bull bought it. Very different ambitions, and finally access to the means we had dreamed of. A lot of good people came in. Then we were incredibly lucky to get Sebastian [Vettel] and he had an incredible start to his career there. And in 2007, ’08, he was really doing something more special every few races. It ended up with the Monza win, which feels extraordinary still now.”

In 2014, Mekies’ career took a completely different tack when he joined the FIA, initially in the role of safety director. Later he became F1 deputy race director, working alongside Charlie Whiting: “It was eight years at Toro Rosso, but if you add Minardi at the same Faenza base, I had been there for 11 years. I was really asking myself, ‘Do you want the same chapter again? Do you want the same chapter somewhere else? Or do you want to try something different?’ And I wanted to try something different.

“With the FIA I rediscovered motor sport. It’s not only F1, it’s not only your small team. You see everything that is incredible about motor sport, from the volunteers to the federations, and doing the safety jobs across all championships was just a massive learning experience. And being Charlie’s deputy was an incredible addition to that.”

Ferrari Formula 1 engineers in the pit garage

Mekies in his Ferrari right-hand-man role with team principal Fred Vasseur, 2023 British GP; a poor 9-10 finish

Getty Images

The general idea was that Mekies would take over from Whiting. But he didn’t see a long-term future at the FIA and in 2018 switched direction to join Ferrari as sporting director, working (briefly) under Maurizio Arrivabene and then Mattia Binotto.

“The FIA offered everything I needed professionally in terms of love for the sport,” he says. “It did not offer the competitiveness aspect, which is a huge part of what gets us out of bed. If you have the opportunity to go back racing with Ferrari, you are always going to take the call. It felt like a dream come true. That’s how it felt, to stop in Maranello and to discover the Ferrari world, to discover the Ferrari passion. Even though I had been working for so many years in the sport, it still felt like a big shock again.

Motorsport officials walking along the Silverstone circuit

Mekies became FIA deputy F1 race director in 2017, working alongside chief Charlie Whiting

Dppi

“The Maurizio cycle closed quite quickly after I arrived, and the Mattia cycle opened up, and to be at the beginning of that cycle with him and his team was an incredible adventure, something I can probably not compare to anything. Ultimately, we did not make it to the goal we had, which was to win the world championships. We finished second twice in these five years. So that’s probably the painful part, that ultimately we are here to try to win that title, and we failed. But the adventure was incredible.”

Related article

By 2023, Vasseur had replaced Binotto. Mekies, now racing director, was his right-hand man, and the two Frenchmen appeared to be the perfect combination. But part way through the season he was invited by Helmut Marko and Horner to return to Faenza – this time as the boss: “Helmut and Christian called, five minutes apart from each other! They obviously had discussed it between them, and they asked me if I would be interested in joining AlphaTauri to become the team principal, and they explained to me what was the next chapter, and what they wanted to do after Franz [Tost] retired. That was a tough one to decide, because as a fan it’s difficult to understand why you should be leaving Ferrari.

“The Mattia cycle had closed, the Fred cycle was opening, and as much as they are extremely different to one another, and that I was extremely close to Mattia through those years, it’s equally true that Fred and I had known each other for years. When he came to Ferrari in the first few months we spent time together and it clicked straight away. It was clear we would be enjoying working together and I could learn from him. At the end of the day the reasoning was that it’s a train that passes and you don’t know when the next time the train is going to pass. So I decided to take the train.”

Red Bull Racing engineer working at a computer in the garage

F1’s new regs for 2026 were criticised by Red Bull driver Max Verstappen, but Mekies is overseeing improvement as the year progresses

Sutton

With CEO Peter Bayer – a former FIA colleague – Mekies helped to rebuild the team we now know as Racing Bulls through 2024 and the first half of 2025. He had no inkling that a transfer to the sister squad would come so soon. “No, absolutely not,” he insists. “You are so concentrated on your own battles and path to bring the team to a more competitive point. We were just trying to make rapid progress with Racing Bulls, building a team to have stronger foundations, and finding the right people. This came completely unexpectedly.”

The Red Bull job comes with challenges, but ultimately it’s down to giving Verstappen a car that’s worthy of his talent. Mekies is well aware of how good the Dutchman is. “There are many aspects,” he states. “There is the aspect of guaranteed speed. There is the aspect of he never gets a foot wrong. Then you have the extreme technical sensitivities and feedback.” The last point refers to Verstappen’s habit of speaking his mind over any shortcomings of the car and indeed F1 in general. But Mekies is sanguine: “There are so many aspects in Max that are extraordinary,” he says. “The minimum we can do is deal with the emotion.”

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

The first few months of this season were nervous ones for the bosses of Red Bull’s Formula 1 team.

Victories were not on the agenda. The car Red Bull had built to the new rules was not performing as it wanted. Beyond a basic lack of pace, some of its characteristics were the same ones that had plagued them for the last couple of years under the previous ruleset – fundamentally, an inconsistent through-corner balance.

In 2025, the team had been saved by Max Verstappen’s brilliance, the Dutchman putting in a second half of the season so good it was talked about as one of the all-time great comebacks. In the end, he did not quite pull off the miracle that his genius and McLaren’s occasional fumbling made look possible at one stage, falling two points short of the title as Lando Norris hung on.

Max Verstappen sits in his Red Bull F1 car

No wins in 2026 so far for Verstappen; his last season without victory was 2015

DPPI

Now, though, as a new regulatory era dawned, such achievements were out of the question. Red Bull was far from the pace, and it knew a title challenge in 2026 was a distant dream.

“For Red Bull, the prospect of losing its star asset was unthinkable, yet at the same time very real”

They also knew what that meant. If Verstappen was not in title contention, then his contract, which ran to the end of 2028, meant nothing. It had a clause in it that would allow him to walk away at the end of 2026 if a certain performance level was not met. And there was no way it would be.

For Red Bull, the prospect of losing its star asset was unthinkable, and yet at the same time very real. Behind the scenes, it was trying to reassure Verstappen, get him to commit to the team, while well aware he was considering his future. The fact that he hated the new 2026 engines and the way they reduced the challenge of driving only made it worse. At Suzuka in March, he even revealed that he was considering quitting F1 altogether.

Now, though, Verstappen has shed some light on what that time was like. In an interview with me for BBC Sport at the Italian Grand Prix in September, he was remarkably open about the journey he had been on in 2026, which eventually led to him extending his contract with Red Bull until 2030 in August.

“I always said to them, don’t stress about it, just work on the car,” Verstappen said. “Because the faster the car goes, the easier the decision is anyway. So that’s what we did. And I can understand, of course, maybe sometimes they were a little bit worried. But at the same time, for me, I was just worried about here and what was going on.”

Red Bull F1 car racing during the 2026 season

A spin for Verstappen in the early part of the Miami GP in May… and a lacklustre start to 2026

DPPI

“You have to follow your heart at the end of the day. That has always worked for me quite well”

Verstappen spent the first few months of the year exploring his options, and his feelings. He talked with Mercedes and McLaren. He pondered whether he could drive in F1 with the new energy-starved engines. He looked at what F1 was doing in terms of trying to fix the issues all the drivers felt the power-units had.

“Of course, any kind of chat you take seriously,” he said. “They’re all very respectful chats. There’s nothing wrong with that. I felt that staying was for me the right choice. You have to follow your heart at the end of the day. That has always worked for me quite well.

Max Verstappen wearing his Red Bull racing helmet

Helmet inspired by Delft Blue pottery for Zandvoort

DPPI, Getty Images, Red Bull Content Pool

“I could have run away very early on in my Red Bull career and go somewhere else to try and win. If you have a little bit of patience, you do end up winning. I feel like that’s my approach now as well.”

“Let’s say it’s been a bit downwards from the dominant years, but I don’t mind rebuilding it”

Verstappen, in contrast to appearances, says it’s not all about winning for him, and that in the end he decided the challenge of trying to get Red Bull back where they were was what he wanted to take on.

“You need to feel well where you are,” he said. “I don’t have that desire or need to show in another car that I can win it or whatever. I mean, it’s easy to run to the fastest car and then do it all again. But it’s not how I am.

Red Bull F1 car speeding around the circuit

A pity Verstappen couldn’t reach the finish line – or indeed finish the first lap – in the Dutch GP farewell

DPPI, Getty Images, Red Bull Content Pool

“You cannot be the captain of the ship and as soon as there is something not working, you jump off the ship. That’s not how I am. Let’s say it’s been a bit downwards from the dominant years, but I don’t mind rebuilding it. It’s another challenge as well.”

Related article

As for the engines, he does not like the way drivers need to ensure battery levels are at the maximum level for deployment on straights and how it neuters corners. But he recognises the fact that F1 and the FIA have accepted there is a problem.

The split between internal combustion and electrical power will change from 53/47 this year to 60/40 by 2028. By 2030/31, there will be a new engine formula. It remains to be seen what it is, whether FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem gets his wish for naturally aspirated V8s – which is also Max’s – or whether realpolitik results in it being a V8 turbo-hybrid but without the excessive need for energy recovery. But he knows a ‘better’ F1 – as he would see it – is coming.

He explains his journey on the rules like this: “Hoping that it will be better in the future. Accepting where we are at the moment. Still the love for the sport. Not at the moment the driving. I love competition, naturally. I just hope that in the coming years, towards 2030, it can only get better. Also for the future generation, we don’t want this. I just accepted where we are now. And to start to make the best of it.”

Red Bull F1 car cornering at speed

The Dutchman has been critical of Red Bull’s RB22, calling it “undriveable” – yet he’s been a podium regular this season

Getty Images, Philip Platzer

Verstappen describes Red Bull as “like a second family”. But he has expectations. Eventually, he will want to be winning again. The new contract has performance clauses in it. In reality, little has changed. So if Red Bull doesn’t show signs of improvement, the nervous times will start again.

Andrew Benson is the BBC’s Formula 1 correspondent

Max’s thoughts… away from F1

Max Verstappen wearing Red Bull Racing teamwear

Getty Images

WHAT’S ON HIS BUCKET LIST?

“All the endurance races. Eventually, of course, also Hypercar [the World Endurance Championship]. I don’t want to rush it. I want to do it in the right environment. On my terms. And be competitive”

Red Bull Mercedes GT3 car surrounded by fans

Getty Images

FAVOURITE RACE OF THE YEAR

“I enjoyed the Nordschleife [Nürburgring 24 Hours]. It was super-cool to be able to do an endurance event with my team-mates, the guys that won with the car throughout the main season. We knew that we were going to be really strong. We peaked at the right time, but unfortunately the car retired. It was an incredible experience. And pure. Pure motor sport”

Max Verstappen talks with Fernando Alonso at the circuit

Getty Images

ON DOING LE MANS WITH FERNANDO ALONSO

“We’ve talked about it. I mean, look at Fernando. He’s 45 and he’s still flying. Especially for Le Mans, with his experience, it could be a good option. It needs to fit our schedules. It needs to make sense. It needs to be on my terms. And there needs to be a real chance to go there and win it”

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Who knows what riches Max Verstappen was offered to lure him away from Red Bull Racing? A blank cheque, the keys to any kingdom he might desire and all the fringe benefits imaginable, plus promises of untold glories, have the power to turn any driver’s head, especially if they’re struggling to win races. Yet despite those temptations, in August he agreed to a new deal to stay put until at least the end of 2030. No matter what exit clauses there are – and they do exist given the enormous leverage Verstappen has as Formula 1’s best driver – convincing him to put pen to paper is a resounding endorsement of a team badly in need of one.

Red Bull has been transformed. It long ago grew out of the edgy disruption of its youth, transitioning into the dominant twin peaks of its prime from 2010-13 and 2021-24, punctuated by the difficult years when its relationship with Renault broke down. With more than two decades on the clock, it has become something else in middle age: firmly a figure of the establishment whose domain it once brazenly gatecrashed. What’s not yet clear is whether this new incarnation retains the edge that made Red Bull so successful, and whether it can recapture that success.

Max Verstappen pictured alongside Ford Racing branding

From left: Ford-badged 1.6-litre V6 engine is best on the F1 grid; Max Verstappen is central to Red Bull’s plans of returning to the top

Getty Images

Superficially, much is the same. The familiar colour scheme of dark blue, red and yellow remains and Max Verstappen continues to mock the laws of physics by dancing on the limits of the car’s potential, even if the results are subdued. That’s the guarantee you get from him, whether he has a car that can fight for the championship or, as has been the case so far in 2026, one capable only of second or third even on a good day.

When Verstappen signed his new deal, team principal Laurent Mekies described him as one of the pillars needed “to open that winning cycle again”, and identified “the best talents” throughout the organisation and “the number of strategic decisions made that we trust will give us a competitive advantage” as the other keystones. That latter point is revealing – Red Bull needed to prove to Verstappen that it was still capable of being the unbridled winning machine that allowed him to take four titles from 2021-24. He always wanted to stay, but it needed to be about more than just the loyalty that he prizes so much.

“Being part of this team already for such a long time, it’s definitely like a second family,” said Verstappen at the Belgian Grand Prix, just after confirmation of the deal extension. “We have won so much, and we have had so many incredible moments together. And then with Laurent joining last year, from the start the relationship has been really, really good; very open and transparent. And that’s why I think also from my side to make up my mind was just about exactly that: about the future, some strategic decisions as well within the team. For me, it feels absolutely right to continue here. And I always said, and I said this when Dietrich was still alive, my goal and target is to finish my career in this team, and we’re getting closer to that. So, that’s why I’m very proud to extend and try to get back to the top. We have tasted a lot of being on top; that’s why I think you are very hungry to try and get there again.”

Red Bull power unit components and F1 engineering work

From left: Disaster for Verstappen at this year’s Dutch GP; despite a brain drain at Red Bull, the team remains among F1’s ‘big four’

Getty Images

The mention of Dietrich Mateschitz is significant, and is at the heart of understanding why the team is no longer as it once was. The Red Bull co-founder was the driving force behind its motor sport activities, but his death in October 2022 proved an inflection point for the F1 team. He was the alpha and omega of Red Bull’s operations in F1 and beyond; he held full management control despite owning 49% of the company to the co-founding Yoovidhya family’s 51%. His word was law, making him one of the last of the old-school autocratic team owners. As the head of two F1 teams, he wielded his enormous political power judiciously, economically and effectively, ensuring that, on the rare occasions he spoke publicly, his words advanced Red Bull’s cause. Yet while he had control over the F1 team, he never felt the need to flex that power on a day-to-day basis. Christian Horner, a bold appointment as team principal after Red Bull bought the ailing Jaguar team in late 2004, and long-time adviser Helmut Marko were his vicars on earth and had the autonomy to do things their way. Only occasionally did Mateschitz intervene, despite being engaged in what was happening.

“I always said my goal and target is to finish my career in this team”

Human nature abhors a power vacuum, and a struggle for control behind the scenes inevitably followed. Design genius Adrian Newey sought a fresh challenge; Horner battled for even more control and lost out with his eventual ousting in July 2025, which was the consequence of a power struggle rather than the very public controversy that engulfed him in early ’24. Mekies, promoted with no warning from leading Red Bull’s second team, Racing Bulls, has described the “shock” caused by Horner’s departure, and has been charged with leading the team into its new era. Even Marko was pushed out, albeit with the announcement allowing him to describe his departure as “the right moment” to move on. There were no winners, except for Red Bull GmbH itself, which has now exerted a more corporate, less individualistic power over its F1 operations.

Max Verstappen meets Red Bull team members after a race

Red Bull co-founder Dietrich Mateschitz, team chief Christian Horner, adviser Helmut Marko and Marko’s protégé Verstappen, 2018

Dppi

Oliver Mintzlaff, Red Bull’s CEO of corporate projects, is the man at the top, and he has taken an active interest in the F1 team’s operation while keeping a low media profile. He wields some of the power Horner once did, with Mekies a diminished day-to-day boss not through any lack of ability, but through a narrower remit and the desire for there to be greater corporate oversight. As Mintzlaff puts it, “If we look purely at the racing, Laurent Mekies is the boss.” However, Red Bull has wrested control in other areas such as marketing, major personnel-appointment decisions and the big-picture strategy.

“We benefited from Max, the best driver in the world, but the truth is he owes a lot to Red Bull”

Corporate owners becoming too involved is always a concern in F1 because teams are highly specialised and can be weighed down by an excess of interference. They must wield power with a light touch, with full understanding of the people they are dealing with – and Mintzlaff and Verstappen took a little time to get onto the same page. In April last year, Mintzlaff’s public position was that “we benefited a lot from Max, the best driver in the world, but the truth is that he owes a lot to Red Bull”. That followed a year after Verstappen saved Marko from being axed by Red Bull thanks to a clause in his contract that allowed him to leave if such a move was made. But Mintzlaff and the Verstappen camp – Max, father Jos and manager Raymond Vermeulen – are now more closely aligned.

The jury is still out on how effective Mintzlaff is politically, an area where Horner and, when necessary, Mateschitz were potent forces. Indeed, given how the shaping of the ADUO system – the ‘additional development and upgrade opportunities’ to allow power unit development – played out, with Red Bull’s V6 being deemed the benchmark, it’s legitimate to ask whether Mintzlaff missed a trick. But with FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem publicly backing the push for further changes on the power unit side to help struggling Honda and needing support from rival manufacturers, there’s a chance to fix that amid the horse-trading this will demand.

Max Verstappen drives the Red Bull F1 car

Despite difficulties with Red Bull’s RB22, Verstappen’s racing élan keeps the car among the frontrunners

Getty Images

That the Red Bull Powertrains engine is good enough to be considered the best in F1 is remarkable in itself – and note that this applies only to the performance of the V6 internal combustion engine outside of the energy recovery systems that contribute 47% of the power, which explains why its Ford-badged power unit overall is not as strong as the Mercedes. Red Bull Powertrains is a brand-new operation and, while it invested in the best equipment and people, many poached from Mercedes including boss Ben Hodgkinson, there was no guarantee of success. But the ethos within the company matches that which made Red Bull’s F1 team so successful, namely an aggressive, free-thinking approach that is reckoned to be markedly different to the more conservative mindset within the Mercedes programme.

Returning to the chassis side, Verstappen’s reference to “strategic decisions” was deliberately oblique. The most obvious example is the new state-of-the-art wind tunnel, under construction at Red Bull’s Milton Keynes base, that will come online next year. Its current tunnel at Bedford has served the team well, and is at a very high level technologically, but is limited by its origins as, to use a phrase beloved by Horner, “a cold war relic”. There are some problems you can’t get around, notably the temperature sensitivity caused by the ageing structure, which makes the data unreliable below 5˚C or above 25˚C. Even within that temperature window, it’s not quite as high-fidelity as the latest tunnels in F1 used by teams such as McLaren and Aston Martin. It’s no surprise Red Bull has had correlation problems at times. But that wind-tunnel project was green-lit long ago, so there’s much more to this than that single big-ticket item.

Red Bull’s Ford-powered F1 car on track

Verstappen has voiced concerns about the ride of Red Bull’s cars – past and present – on the kerbs

Dppi

Technically, Red Bull is stumbling down a rocky development road. It started the last regulations cycle in 2022 in all-conquering form, with Newey designing that year’s suspension around good mechanical platform control with minimal dive and pitch. This worked well, meaning the porpoising that blighted others wasn’t a limiting factor and, after some initial trouble from Ferrari, Verstappen dominated that season. Red Bull then steamrollered the opposition in 2023, winning 21 out of 22 races, with Verstappen taking the title again in 2024 as resurgent McLaren took the constructors’ crown. Red Bull’s failure that year was ascribed primarily to Sergio Pérez’s struggles in the second car, but that was only part of the story.

“It isn’t easy to pinpoint one exact problem. It might be a few things”

McLaren pushed to run at lower ride heights, unlocking more performance potential once it got porpoising under control, while Red Bull was trapped by the ceiling of its own concept. And, as Verstappen stressed repeatedly, even when it was winning easily, the characteristics that would become a problem in 2024 and ’25 were already a limiting factor. Today there are still problems with car balance and ride that blunt Red Bull’s sharpest weapon – Verstappen. While the chassis rules changed completely this year, the processes and tools used to design the car remain, and some stubborn problems remain.

“Some things carried over from the previous cars,” says Verstappen. “I was complaining about the ride on the kerbs before and I’m still complaining about it, so there are things that we are looking into, to try and fix. But the answer is not very clear or straightforward, otherwise we would have fixed those things. Performance can be very complicated and it isn’t easy to pinpoint one exact problem, because it might be a few things that come together that create a problem. You need to figure out all those details on the car to try and be better.”

Red Bull F1 car alongside a wind tunnel model

From left: A new wind tunnel is being built in Milton Keynes; Max has suggested he’ll stay with Red Bull for the rest of his career

Red Bull still has much to prove in the post-Newey era. While he was not the sole architect of its success, he played a key role even at times when there were attempts to downplay it. Indeed, after leaving he gently railed against suggestions he was not that engaged in F1, underlining the fact that he remained influential. But designing and developing an F1 car is a collaborative task and there is still enormous depth on that side at Red Bull. Technical director Pierre Waché has played a crucial part, taking over that role in 2018 and working with Newey until the design legend left and, while he had strong support from Verstappen, this must have been shaken by the stuttering progress in recent years. While its car is no longer limited by the narrow operating window that hindered Verstappen two years ago, this still hasn’t been sufficiently widened, which points to ghosts in the machine that must be run down.

Related article

There has also been a significant brain drain – those you’ve heard of, such as Jonathan Wheatley (to Audi, which he’s now left), head of racing/Verstappen’s race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase (still working for Red Bull but with a deal to join McLaren), former chief designer Craig Skinner and Rob Marshall, now chief technical officer at McLaren, as well as many less-familiar names down the ranks – so it’s legitimate to question whether Red Bull has been diminished. However, many of the characteristics – the sheer competitive drive and a culture that is often compared to that of a much smaller team, “an F3000 team” as Horner once put it – remain. Whether that will fade over time is another question. F1 is a fast-moving sport, but the ebbs and flows of teams can happen at a glacial rate.

Verstappen explains his thinking behind staying with Red Bull elsewhere in this issue. However it is thought there is another reason too: the desire to finish his career with Red Bull to fulfil some kind of promise made to Mateschitz. But the most important factor must be his confidence that Red Bull in its current form is capable of returning to the top. Verstappen is crucial to that not only because of how quick he is, but also because of what Mekies has characterised as the ability to identify the “untapped lap time reservoirs” in the car that can be exploited.

Max Verstappen celebrates with Red Bull’s Ford-powered car

From left: Second in Hungary – one of half a dozen podiums for Max in ’26; Red Bull’s partnership with Ford lasts until at least 2030

The question is whether this changed version of Red Bull has the magic of its former self. It has the resources and the personnel to do it, not to mention the enormous potential of being a fully integrated works operation in control of its own power unit destiny. The ingredients are largely the same, but much depends on whether the replacement of autonomy and empowerment with corporate oversight can recapture the sharpness of response that defined Red Bull in its glory years. Verstappen’s new deal suggests he believes that it can, but he also knows there’s an escape route should he need it.

What’s positive is that Red Bull’s current form is good. It remains firmly in F1’s big four and, while Verstappen managed just six podium finishes in the first 14 grands prix of this season, it’s on average only 0.6% off on single-lap pace – equating to around half a second over an 80sec lap. Bearing in mind that it has a power unit disadvantage in terms of overall performance, this suggests a car that, while not outstanding, is still effective.

Anything less than regular wins and a title challenge is a failure for Red Bull, with the small difference in performance between a good team and a great one the product of the resources and people. Verstappen has staked his future on Red Bull understanding that its success under Mateschitz was down to freedom and empowerment, not exerting control for its own sake.

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

I must confess I have a lot to be thankful to Gordon Murray for in keeping the ‘who designed the MP4/4’ debate alive and kicking. You will be aware, I am sure, of the ongoing ’slight disagreement’ that I, and at least 16 other McLaren colleagues involved with the design of the MP4/4, have had over the years with his version of events and how that car came to be designed.

More to the point, as we have stated on many occasions, it was Steve Nichols (appointed by Gordon, by the way), who as chief designer was 100% responsible for its architecture, layout and overall design. A responsibility conferred on him by both Sir Ron Dennis and Gordon himself in August 1987 – and as described in a memo to the staff written by Gordon (which I still have) outlining everyone’s roles and responsibilities.

 

McLaren MP4/4 Honda photographed from the front

Getty Images

You can imagine, therefore, when I saw your article on the Brabham BT55 in the September 2026 issue [Brabham’s flawed lowline turbo: BT55], I read with some trepidation how the article might finish. Sure enough, consistent with form, I wasn’t disappointed. Gordon is quoted as stating how the success of the 4/4 was born out of the failure of the BT55. The problem is, our recollections are not at all aligned with his.

Firstly, neither Steve Nichols nor I (as project leader for the monocoque and front suspension design) have any recollection of Gordon showing us BT55 drawings. We had no reason to see them anyway for a number of reasons, excluding the fact it would have been highly unethical.

The layout of the 4/4 was determined as a consequence of fuel tank volume size, engine shape and height (Honda were well advanced in ’87 with the design of the low crank height allowed by the 5in diameter Tilton clutch) and the drivers’ feet position. The rear end of the car was shaped largely by the MP4/3. In addition, we did not set out to base the car on the 55 – why would we given what a disaster it had been? Can you imagine Steve saying to Ron at the start, “Oh, by the way, we’re basing the design of your new car on the 55”? Er, no…

McLaren MP4/4 design drawings showing Prost and Senna seating positions

Matthew Jeffreys’ MP4/4 seat arrangements

Secondly, we have no recollection of Gordon ’starting us off’ by showing us the drivers’ seating positions in the 55. I and my colleague Hugh Moran were responsible for the seat-back angle in the monocoque, and therefore the drivers’ seating positions; at no stage did we base it on the 55.

Thirdly, Gordon says, “Prost drove the car and said, ‘I’m not driving like that, I want to be stood up again.’” Again, I think Gordon’s memory may be failing him: both Alain and Ayrton sat in a mock-up of the monocoque in January and February 1988, after which we made the seats that went into MP4/4-02 for the first Imola test on March 23. Alain had a more upright driving position from the word go as, being smaller than Ayrton, the only way he could get his eyeline above the steering wheel and instrument panel was to sit up more compared with Ayrton. Interestingly, even though Alain’s head was about 3in further forward than Ayrton’s, their eye positions were the same height and they remained in those positions for the whole year. See my drawing, above.

So, why am I so thankful to Gordon? Well, one of my hobbies these days is drawing and painting side profiles of F1 cars that are interesting to me and others; of course the 4/4 is also a popular one. See instagram.com/car_profile_art. The debate surrounding the birth of the 4/4 serves as a wonderful way to keep the interest in the public eye and as a result I sell more prints! Moreover, I feel sad that despite the great cars Gordon has done over the years, he is still not able to give credit where it’s due and put Steve in the spotlight for the 4/4.

Matthew Jeffreys, McLaren design engineer 1984-2005

I have just been reading the article about Andy Green’s world record, this time in the JCB Hydromax car [Pulling a fast one, October]. Congratulations to all concerned.

I was amused, however, by the reference to the creative thinking employed by some at the Bonneville Speed Week to switch their car from one class to another by removal of a piston and balancing the crankshaft.

In 1949 Syd Enever of MG and Goldie Gardner were using such tricks to establish multiple international class records in EX 135: Maintaining the Breed – John Thornley. Perhaps others may know of earlier instances. As the Book of Ecclesiastes says, there is nothing new under the sun.

John Clegg, Chadderton

I’m disappointed by Motor Sport’s rankings of the top 10 F1 team-mates [The best of team-mates, August]. The Ferrari combination of Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello should have been number one. Five titles – driver and team, consecutively, 2000-04! This five-year run of driver excellence in combination with Ferrari brilliance may never be matched on the track again.

William Hume, Wisconsin

I’m Canadian and unable to attend many BTCC events, but I was well aware of the stellar career of Jason Plato through the pages of Motor Sport. Your article on the man [From the brink, September], his challenges and recovery was thoughtful, poignant and brave. As was the man himself.

Anthony Jenkins, Stirling, Canada

Regarding your interview with Heinz-Harald Frentzen [For me F1 was a special job, of course it was, but it was just a job, September]: What a nice bloke!

Jon Jeffrey, Llandudno Junction

Ken Tyrrell standing beside a streamlined record car

Prolific record-chasing driver Goldie Gardner with MG’s EX 135 – today at the British Motor Museum

Getty Images

It’s just occurred to me that, over its history, the Sauber F1 squad has been the factory team for Mercedes, BMW and now Audi. This is surely unique in the annals of motor sport history. They just need Porsche for the full set!

Bryan Caldwell, via email

The photograph of the October 2026 edition [Grand Prix at 60] is wrongly captioned. The dapper Frenchman in the photo is not Yves Montand but my friend Bernard Cahier, the famous photo-journalist. He had a speaking cameo part in the film as a… journalist. He was a good friend of John Frankenheimer and was an adviser on the film.

Another bit of interest in the feature is in the photo. In the background, just to the right of Pete Aron’s helmet, is the bearded face of my friend Peter Ustinov. Peter was a car and racing fan and good friend of Bernard Cahier so no surprise to see him involved in the film.

Dennis Thalmann, Ladenburg, Germany

Regarding Doug Nye’s article in the September edition [Rumblings]. It is worth mentioning that so successful was Ken Miles in his MG Flying Shingle that MG offered him a seat in their EX 182 at Le Mans in 1955. The car, a prototype MGA, finished a respectable 12th thus giving Miles his Le Mans christening.

Alistair Crooks, Victoria, Canada

Ayrton Senna surrounded by photographers and spectators

Recognise the bearded face behind Pete Aron in Grand Prix? Peter Ustinov was a motor racing fan

LAT

I have always followed motor sport with an avid interest and never thought I would race cars. Thanks to my good friend Paul Andrew and Mint Motorsport, at 59 I was encouraged to do my ARDS test. I passed despite crashing at Druids at Oulton Park!

I picked up my October copy and saw to my surprise my picture (though at the back) in On the Road. I was the Porsche! It was the cumulation of a childhood dream to see my picture there in your magazine, so thank you. You’re never too old to try, and to have raced on circuits where my heroes have raced is a great experience no matter where I finish. I would encourage any reader who is thinking about it, to have a go. The motor sport community are friendly and engaging.

Paul newsham, Leyland

Related article

Nice to see a namecheck for Harry in the last edition [McLaren’s sense of porpoise, September]. Harry (Smith) was a bit of a ‘family retainer’ type at the old McLaren Colnbrook base. Never got dirty, always in his flat hat, man of few words but came into his own for maintenance jobs or whenever something needed urgently air freighting to USA or wherever. Then he would be going hammer and tongs with his tools and 6in nails. An unsung hero in motor sport.

Dave Munro, Wirral

While researching a book about the history of the British Grand Prix, I came upon an interesting anomaly which I wondered if any of your readers could throw light upon?

When I got to the 1955 event at Aintree, I noticed that all the race numbers on the entry list were even numbered, with no odd ones. This proved to be the case again in 1957. Further investigation revealed that from the start of the world championship in 1950 (and possibly before – I haven’t checked) all grand prix race numbers, apart from Britain and Indianapolis, were even numbered only.

In 1952, Germany used odd and even (albeit commencing with 101), and in 1958, the Netherlands began to use odd and even. All other races used even numbers only. The practice seemed to have slowly died out in the mid-1960s. Does anyone know why this convention might have been adopted and why Britain didn’t adhere to it until the first race at Aintree?

Chas Parker, Battle, East Sussex


Contact us…

18-20 Rosemont Road, London, NW3 6NE email: [email protected]

Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

2025 Porsche’s Cayman GTS review: a riot on the road

Many of the world’s great circuits have their signature corners. Spa has Eau Rouge, Suzuka 130R, Monza the Parabolica and so on. Their reputations have been earned for their challenging nature, corners which bring out the best in the best. But there are just a couple which have gained their reputations for being just, well, weird. The Karussell at the Nürburgring, the line actually being a drainage ditch, and the Corkscrew here at Laguna Seca, noted for its blind approach, 18m drop to the left and blind exit to the right. I’m not sure I much like it, but it is both unique and interesting, rarely more so than when your chosen means of descent is a two tonne Bentley. It is, I hope, the closest experience I’ll have to going over Niagara Falls in a barrel.

Make that 1.999 tonnes of Bentley. And it’s a figure of which Bentley is rightly proud, marking as it does the near half-tonne weight reduction achieved turning a regular Continental GT Speed into this Supersports. It is the lightest Bentley for nearly 70 years and exists, I strongly suspect, as a balance to the all-electric Torcal SUV. This is Bentley restating what has long been the case: that it is the most broadly defined of all luxury automotive brands. Which other marque, for instance, could claim both to be a multiple Le Mans winner and supplier of the monarch’s State Limousine?

Shedding all that weight appears to have been largely straightforward with none of the witchcraft to which others have reverted to shrug off the kilos. No hollow carpet fibres here… Instead the lion’s share has been done by binning the entire hybrid system, the front driveshafts and differential and the rear seats, belts and bags. Standard ceramic brakes and lightweight forged wheels help too, but otherwise major modifications are not about losing weight, but controlling what remains with revisions to suspension, steering and electronics, and using bigger turbos to replace at least some of the power lost by ditching the hybrid. The result is a car which finds itself in the curious position of having the least power of any car in the Continental range, yet by a distance the best power-to-weight ratio.

Bentley grand tourer driving on a race track

Side-to-side paint-fade technique, unique to Bentley

All of which, combined with its aggressive appearance and the fact we were only allowed to drive on the circuit, and not at all on the road, suggests clearly that the first Bentley road car intended primarily for track use, at least since the launch of the original 3-litre Supersports back in 1925. But suggestions, like appearances, can be deceptive. This is not a track car, and we’re only driving it at Laguna Seca because Bentley has a grand total of two pre-production prototypes to let the press drive (on a normal launch that number would be around 20) and all 500 of the production run sold long before anyone got a go. Yes, even for over a third of a million pounds each.

It’s hard to reach definitive conclusions about a car when only able to drive it in an environment to which it is not best-suited, and harder still when you’re not allowed to turn off the traction control, lest you stick it in the wall and halve the number of cars at Bentley’s disposal.

“In terms of pure dynamic ability, this is the best Bentley there has been”

But I can tell you that in terms of pure dynamic ability, this is the best Bentley there has been and, if you think about it, it would have been quite curious were it anything less. Even on sticky (optional) Pirelli Trofeo RS track day rubber, traction is limited, but when it grips, goodness me it goes, belting unadulterated thunder from its end-to-end titanium exhaust pipes. And stops. The ceramics are the same as you can option into a Speed, but with the weight of an entire car removed from the job sheet, they may be the most over-specified components on the car.

Even so, it is the way it dives into the corner off the power, all delicious and neutral, and then allows you to slide ever so gently away (we were allowed at least to use the sport setting for the ESC). Because it’s lost the big battery at the back it’s actually fundamentally less well-balanced than a Speed, but you’d never know when driving it. This car is playful in a way I don’t recall any Bentley being playful since perhaps the short-wheelbase Continental T of 30 years back, and about nine hundred times more capable.

And yet it was just a little frustrating, because I have a feeling that this could be a very special car indeed, if let loose among the wide open spaces of Europe. It’s quiet enough at part throttle to cruise and there was no suggestion the ride had gone to pot either. What I suspect this car actually is, is the greatest sporting GT Bentley has ever made. But I cannot say for certain. How happy I would be for the opportunity to prove that point, correct the record and establish this car’s true place in the Bentley pantheon. But with all cars sold and no further press therefore needed, I’m not holding my breath.

Bentley luxury interior with red and black leather seats

Two-tone colourway on the inside (three available too)

Bentley Supersports

● Price £342,900
● Engine 4 litres, eight cylinders, twin turbo, petrol
● Power 657bhp at 6000rpm
● Torque 590lb ft at 2000rpm
● Weight 1999kg (DIN)
● Power to weight 329bhp per tonne
● Transmission Eight-speed double clutch, rear-wheel drive
● 0-62mph 3.7sec
● Top speed 192mph
● Economy 18mpg
● CO2 TBA/km
● Verdict Possibly Bentley’s GT best.


Review

Purple Honda electric hatchback driving on a road

Cheap and Very Cheerful

On Test: Honda Super-N, £18,025

More Proof that ‘brilliant’ and ‘electric’ Can Sit in The Same Sentence so Long as The Cars Are Cheap and Small. It Has a Tiny Battery (138-Mile Range) and It Is Also Very Light for An Ev, Just 1097kg. This Is a Commuter Car Pure and Simple and One of The Most Charming I’ve Stumbled Across.

Verdict: A Hoot to Chuck Around Town.


Coming Soon

New Lancia Gamma parked outside a modern building

Lancia Gamma Returns

But Don’t Expect a Right-Hand-Drive Version

Remember the Lancia Gamma? Well, It’s Back. the Name, that Is – the New Car Is a Hybridised, Crossover Suv. so What Chance of Lancias Being on Sale in The Uk Again? It Will Need to Be Established Across Europe Before Its Stellantis Paymaster Considers Tooling up For Right-Hand Drive.


Insider News

Red Chevrolet Camaro driving along a country road

Chevy Camaro Comeback

Could the Muscle Car Revival Start in 2028?

The traditional American muscle car has been dying a slow death. But if rumours are true, the genre may not be dead. Talk of a new Camaro is getting louder, with a launch as soon as 2028. And if it comes it would make sense to transplant the 6.7-litre V8 already found in the back of the Corvette into the front of the new car.