Haas's unrealistic expectations: 'You wouldn't set up an F1 team like this now,' says new boss

F1

Ayao Komatsu has been appointed as Haas's new team principal, replacing Guenther Steiner. But as Chris Medland asks, does he face an uphill battle against a team owner who doesn't realise what it needs to succeed?

Gene Haas F1 owner

Gene Haas fired his much-loved team principal over the winter break — but will it fix the team's on-track issues?

Haas

“Hi all, just to clarify – we’ll be clearing the front car park by reception, so if you’re attending this afternoon by car, there should be a spot for you at the front of the building.”

With apologies to Haas for slightly weaponising the lovely touch of making access easy for media on Tuesday afternoon, but the issue of car parking at its Banbury headquarters is a regular source of ire for the team.

The Williams campus at Grove is close to five times the size of the Banbury building, but then you’ve got to take into account those working for Haas out of Kannapolis, or Maranello, or Dallara members near Parma…

But aside from the US base, all of those facilities have limitations on space as originally built for a very different team or purpose. And given three of them are outside of the famed ‘Motor Sport Valley’ that claims to be home to the majority of the best Formula 1 engineering talent, it’s Banbury that is most likely the closest location to any potential target that Haas might want to sign.

Related article

And trying to attract staff by way of the small warehouse with limited parking wedged between a kitchen workshop and living solutions company, is far from easy.

The man tasked with that job for the past decade was unceremoniously replaced between Christmas and New Year, with team owner Gene Haas opting for Ayao Komatsu as Guenther Steiner’s replacement. And the Japanese engineer is very much aware of the challenges faced by the current Haas structure.

“Of course, if you’re setting up on a blank sheet of paper, you’re not going to set up an F1 team with two separate factories in the UK and Italy, but that’s how we started and that was very beneficial in ’16, ’17, ’18 to get off the ground,” Komatsu says. “Then of course the landscape changes, certain regulation changes happen, so the team needs to develop.

“Those kind of things we need to assess continuously. But again, if you ask me is that ideal, having a UK office here and an Italy office there? No. But is that a main constraint? No. Can we do better? Absolutely yes. So that’s what I’m focused on.

“If we get the maximum out of how we set up, and then if that becomes right, we [therefore] cannot do anything better with the way we set up [and] then we can talk about that. That’s my strategy, if you like. But of course you’ve got to have that, not in the back of your mind, but as a strategy medium, long-term where you might want to go. But that’s not my focus at the minute.”

Haas new team principal

Will Komatsu be the answer to Haas’s problems?

Haas

Komatsu flies to Italy today (Wednesday) to visit Haas employees in Europe and understand where they feel there have been issues in the past. It’s an admirable approach that he wouldn’t speak too sweepingly about changes or a different structure until he was aware of how each different location sees things, but it all simply underlines the enormous issues that Gene Haas appears to be ignoring.

When he spoke last week, the team owner stated that he is no longer interested in being “humiliated every weekend” by finishing last, and that he can’t comprehend why the team is in that position.

“It’s really all about winning,” Haas added. “We have a great team, we have great engines, we have really great drivers. There’s no reason why we are 10th. I can’t understand how we can be with all the equipment and people we have.”

It’s about the other nine teams, Gene.

Haas

Komatsu (left) could face an uphill battle in changing the mind of Haas (right) in order to push the team forward

Haas

When Haas entered in 2016, as Komatsu points out, the model worked to get the team up and running and quickly competitive. But F1 is almost unrecognisable compared to 2016, when Sauber and Force India were on the brink — the latter disappearing and being taken over — and Williams was also severely under-resourced despite developing a strong car for those regulations.

Renault had only just repurchased Lotus and had a huge amount of rebuilding work to do, while McLaren-Honda was a mess. Five teams ripe for the taking, and Haas took advantage at certain times.

Now, all of those teams are facing immensely different futures. Sauber will become Audi in two years’ time, Aston Martin’s investments and new facilities are hugely impressive, Williams is attracting big names under ambitious ownership and funding, and McLaren has very much got its act together having expanded its design team and capabilities.

Related article

Only really Alpine lacks a clear direction, but as a full constructor and power unit manufacturer it has greater potential. Whether it delivers on that potential remains up for debate, but then it too shares the approach of the multinational bases with Haas.

In the cost cap era, working efficiently and maximising your development have never been more crucial, and Komatsu knows that’s why Haas is falling behind, even as he tries to put a brave face on it.

“Ideally, if you have no constraints, of course you put everybody in the same factory, right? Same with designers, when certain things break it’s so important for designers to have that part in their hand. So yeah, ideally, that’s the case, but that’s not how we’re set up, and that’s not going to change in the foreseeable future.

“So again, like I said, I try to maximise what we have got to start off with, get to the absolute limitation, and then when we get to the stage where we really cannot do anything more with this set-up, and then this is the limit, then maybe there’s a discussion point.

“But at this minute, what I found is that depending on people’s capability, it depends how you know each other, if you know somebody personally well, and then this person is let’s say, technically on a certain level, I found that actually it’s fine, mostly, to work remotely.

“But when you don’t have that personal relationship, when you don’t know the person very well, or this person’s skillset or level is just below the certain level required, then it can go from absolutely fine, to absolutely not fine. It’s a bit case-by-case, so you cannot say a blanket statement that the separate office doesn’t work. In certain cases I’ve seen, even with the current organisation, certain areas where it works really well, with no issues whatsoever. But in certain areas, it’s a big issue. So case-by-case.”

Haas Kevin Magnussen

Haas technically have all the tools for success — with a strong driver line-up at its core — but will it be enough?

Haas

The former chief race engineer was never going to turn down the chance to take over the team —“I didn’t know exactly what he wanted to do but he wanted to promote somebody internally, so of course I was surprised, but at the same time I was really grateful” — but he’s been handed the keys to something that really needs to change significantly, and that requires major investment.

Steiner knew it but couldn’t convince Haas to do so, and it may well be that Komatsu can get more out of the current set-up than his predecessor did. But the ceiling is still far too low for what Haas is expecting out of his team, and it’s those expectations that are the real worry.

Until the team owner realises just what it takes to be consistently competitive in modern Formula 1, he’s only likely to find himself feeling embarrassed again in the future.