Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

He could have what so many want: a full-fat factory drive in the top tier of endurance sports car racing. Instead, Callum Ilott has thrown the dice on a far riskier choice. The 26-year-old from Cambridge has steered away from a prime Hypercar drive with Jota’s works Cadillac team in the World Endurance Championship to head back to IndyCar with a European operation, Prema Racing, which is diving into one of the most competitive and difficult racing series for the first time.

It begs the obvious question for Ilott: why?

“I had unfinished business with IndyCar,” replies Ilott, who has accumulated 40-odd starts in the US single-seater series since 2021 and should make his fourth appearance at the Indianapolis 500 this May. “I wanted to progress and show more of what I could do, and with Prema coming in it’s one of the only teams I’ve stayed in touch with from my junior career. It felt natural to begin their journey with them.”

Still, it’s a brave move. Ilott joined Jota last year in the wake of the small Juncos Hollinger Racing team dropping him after two and bit largely promising seasons in IndyCar. That was a nasty surprise. But then Jota offered potential security and a fresh, exciting opportunity with its customer Porsche 963s. Ilott immediately made an impact, finishing second on his Hypercar debut in Qatar, and then with Will Stevens sensationally scored the first win for a privateer in the WEC’s new era at Spa.

He admits there were some “rookie endurance mistakes” – beaching the Hertz-backed 963 at Imola’s Rivazza for example and crashing at Le Mans late in Wednesday night practice forcing a hurried if heroic rebuild before the race. But overall Ilott was fast, made a positive impression on Jota and loved his season at the team.

Still, the IndyCar siren call drew him back, especially as Prema is a family team with which he has a strong affinity, ever since he drove for the junior single-seater powerhouse in Formula 3 back in 2017.

“I wanted to progress in IndyCar and show more of what I can do”

It hasn’t been an easy start for the team in IndyCar. One of its key recruits, vastly experienced head of engineering Michael Cannon, left before the season even begun, and the team was fined $25,000 (£18,800) for the use of an “unapproved product” on the fire suppression system on one car following a fire in practice at the second round at The Thermal Club. Results from the first two races left little to be desired.

“I think some people may have had different expectations, but we knew the challenges coming into it,” says Ilott, speaking to Motor Sport ahead of the Long Beach Grand Prix. “Operationally we’re running quite well. But in terms of the performance parts you can play around with we are a lot further behind than the others who have 12 years’ experience on this current IndyCar.”

Ilott says the plan has always been for Prema “to hit the ground running” by the time the Big One, the Indy 500 comes around. “Indy is technically the hardest environment I’ve worked in because yes, there are only four corners, but they are four corners at the complete limit of what a car is capable of,” he says. “The whole process [through the two weeks of practice and qualifying], you have to balance race and qualifying running, stay on top of the temperature and wind changes. You can only build up to the limit, you can’t go over it. The moment you do it’s game over, you start way down and your whole two weeks are ruined.

“Each day is different. The first Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday you feel you have loads of time to progress, then suddenly you’re into Fast Friday, the boost is turned up and the car behaves completely differently, you are entering 10mph more into each corner and 10mph at 240mph is an impressive difference. The car really starts to dance on the limit. Then boom, you’re into qualifying day and you really have to trust your car. You do one warm-up lap, then keep your foot flat to the floor through Turn 1, not knowing what kind of balance you are going to have.

“Then it’s race running time Monday to Friday in the second week. You run out of time quickly and you are always fine-tuning. Some get lost trying to find the right things.”

How about race day, with all the Memorial weekend hoopla that comes with the 500? “It’s probably the calmest day at the track,” says Ilott. “You wake up with all the fanfare, the marching bands, but it’s pretty slow-paced until about 10.30am. Then it’s go-time, there’s a lot of people and it all goes by quickly. The atmosphere and the process, the anthems and songs… having done it three times now it flows quite nicely. You understand the way it works, but it’s tiring for a rookie.

“Then the race itself, you’ve got to be aggressive but calm and once the lights go out the goal is to make it through Turn 1. You’re in fuel save mode for at least half of the race, trying to pick off people where you can. That final stint is tough. At that point everyone is at 105%. The restarts are crazy. You get some ballsy moves! The first time I did it you get a sense of the danger. I crashed in that race, which wasn’t a nice experience, but you get to feel the rhythm of this race and know how people are going to behave.”

Ilott seems fully at peace with his decision to take IndyCar over the WEC and Le Mans. Committed to Prema for this season and the next, he cites Scott Dixon and Will Power – both into their third decades as IndyCar stars – as the inspiration for what he wants. But he knows the mighty challenge he and Prema face together. One thing is certain: you can’t doubt the courage of his conviction.

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

Many American racing fans (and even a few drivers) still believe winning the Indianapolis 500 is a more prestigious or important honour than collecting an IndyCar Series championship. Set to run for the 109th time at the end of May, ‘The Greatest Spectacle in Racing’ often lives up to its tagline and no other motor sport event outside of Le Mans raises as much annual anticipation.

The ‘all or nothing’ nature the Indy 500 creates an intense level of pressure for the drivers, whether hunting for their first victory, building on their established Brickyard legend or just trying to qualify for the 33-car field. Riding the bubble on Bump Day is excruciating, and recent years have seen big names including Paul Tracy, Ryan Hunter-Reay and Graham Rahal feel the agony of failing to make the cut.

Things can change quickly. Marcus Ericsson won Indianapolis in 2022, came a very close second to Josef Newgarden in ’23, then barely scraped into the field and finished dead last in 2024. The Indianapolis Motor Speedway is a deceptively simple-looking, fast four-corner rectangle on paper, but no other circuit or race in the world messes more with a driver’s mind.

Here are nine talking points ahead of this year’s ‘International Sweepstakes’..


Alex-Palou---Firestone-Grand-Prix-of-St_-Petersburg---By_-Chris-Jones_Large-Image-Without-Watermark_m123178

1. Perfect Palou 

Álex Palou is already a three-time IndyCar Series champion, and he opened the 2025 season with wins in the first two races. Palou’s victory in Round 2 at The Thermal Club was especially impressive; he turned an 11sec deficit into a 10sec margin of victory, passing and leaving pole winner and long-time leader Pato O’Ward far behind with a crushing final stint.

Palou has won 13 of his 83 IndyCar starts, but none have come on an oval. He’s showed speed, including second place at Indianapolis in 2021 and pole position in ‘23. Oval racing is a unique skill set, and many drivers find winning on an oval is a tough nut to crack. It took six years of trying for Dario Franchitti and Will Power, a pair of modern era IndyCar legends. Don’t expect Palou to be denied much longer, and Indianapolis is his next chance.


Josef-Newgarden---Indianapolis-500-Day-After-Photo-Shoot---By_-Joe-Skibinski_Large-Image-Without-Watermark_m107393

2. All eyes on the treble

Through 108 editions, no driver has won the Indianapolis 500 three consecutive times. Josef Newgarden is the latest to have that opportunity, and the 2017 and ’19 IndyCar champ will be keen to achieve one of the few Indianapolis records not already owned by his team boss, 20-time Indy-winning car owner Roger Penske.

Newgarden’s explanation of his role in Team Penske’s 2024 cheating scandal didn’t endear him to all, but he blocked out the noise to triumph over Pato O’Ward in a thrilling finish for his second straight Indianapolis win. He’s a betting favourite, if not a fan favourite.


Helio-Castroneves---Indianapolis-500-Qualifying---By_-Joe-Skibinski_Large-Image-Without-Watermark_m105106

3. Hélio out for record 

AJ Foyt cemented his legend in 1977 by becoming the first driver to win the Indianapolis 500 four times. It’s still his proudest achievement, matched since by only Al Unser, Rick Mears and Hélio Castroneves, above.

Hélio no longer competes full-time, but he holds a minority stake in Meyer Shank Racing and will chase his historic fifth Indy triumph driving a Honda-powered MSR entry, with technical support from Chip Ganassi Racing.


Scott-Dixon---2024-Indianapolis-500-Qualification-Photo---By_-Walt-Kuhn_Large-Image-Without-Watermark_m105192

4. Can Scott be great?

With six IndyCar championships and 58 race wins, Scott Dixon, above, ranks second only to Foyt. But just one of those wins came at Indianapolis, way back in 2008. Since then, Dixon’s Indy experience has ranged from dominance to despair, often in the course of the same race – a spectacular crash in 2017 and a pit speed violation that cost him a likely win in ‘22.

The Kiwi racer has finished in the top five of the Indy 500 nine times, but a lack of multiple wins at the Brickyard is the last stamp missing from his passport to legendary greatness.


Colton-Herta---108th-Running-of-the-Indianapolis-500---By_-Chris-Owens_Large-Image-Without-Watermark_m106989

5. Herta’s choice

Some believe Colton Herta, above, has an inside line to a seat with Cadillac’s future Formula 1 effort because he is the most successful American IndyCar driver in recent years who is still under 30 (25; Newgarden is 34). That’s contingent not only upon Herta securing enough points to obtain an FIA superlicence (he needs to finish fourth or better in the 2025 IndyCar standings to do so), but on his actual desire to make the move.

An Indy win could help swing things either way – by sending Herta on a solid path to the points he needs to qualify for F1 or convincing him that life would be sweet staying home as an established IndyCar star.


6. Hybrid debut

Hybrid technology was added to IndyCar’s V6 turbo formula in mid-2024, and the jury is still out. There were several high-profile component failures in the early races and a handful of drivers suffered heat-related issues in the second race of ’25 at The Thermal Club. The system has added more than 100lb (45kg) to a car that wasn’t designed to accept it, a detriment to handling especially apparent at oval tracks.

This is the first time the Indianapolis 500 will be run with the hybrid package, and its performance and reliability will be under scrutiny.


Will-Power---Photo-by_-Joe-Skibinski_Large-Image-Without-Watermark_m123712

7. Winners on the up

Winning Indianapolis more than once truly solidifies a driver’s credentials with traditional fans.

Those who have a chance to add number two this year include Marcus Ericsson, Alexander Rossi (now with local favourite team Ed Carpenter Racing) and Will Power, above – who despite being the all-time leader in IndyCar pole positions with 70 has never earned the top starting spot at Indianapolis, with its unique four-lap qualifying format.

Then there’s Takuma Sato, who has developed into an Indy specialist and will be chasing his third 500 win.


Kyle-Larson---Indianapolis-500-Practice---By_-James-Black_Large-Image-Without-Watermark_m105792

8. Two races, one day

For the second year in a row, NASCAR star Kyle Larson, above, will attempt to complete ‘The Double’ by racing in the Indianapolis 500 and the Cup Series’ Coca-Cola 600 at Charlotte Motor Speedway on the same day. Win or lose, he’ll get the biggest cheers in driver introductions at both venues.


GettyImages-230798

9. Bump Day drama

The complicated two-day qualifying procedure of the Indianapolis 500 wrings every last ounce of drama from the normally mundane task of determining the back row of the grid. With as few as 34 or 35 entries vying for 33 starting spots, it can seem pretty pointless – until you see it actually play out. Bobby Rahal, Emerson Fittipaldi, above, and Al Unser Jr all won the Indianapolis 500 – yet are almost equally remembered for failing to qualify.

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

Goodwood is a glorious place to be on a bright spring day, and its 82nd Members’ Meeting was warm enough to roll up the shirt sleeves. Here are our highlights from another superb West Sussex weekend with track action from cars dating from the turn of the 20th century right up to the Hypercar present day…

Goodwood-82MM_JaysonFong_008

“I can nick this one”

Jayson Fong

 

Dario Franchitti vs Harrison Newey (son of Adrian) in DB4 GTs.

Dario Franchitti vs Harrison Newey (son of Adrian) in DB4 GTs.

Jayson Fong

 

UK debut of the Jota Cadillac V-Series.R

UK debut of the Jota Cadillac V-Series.R

Jayson Fong

 

A field mainly made up of Bentleys, Lagondas and Aston Martins were present for the pre-war Earl Howe Trophy

A field mainly made up of Bentleys, Lagondas and Aston Martins were present for the pre-war Earl Howe Trophy

Jayson Fong

 

Origins of the Members’ Meeting date back to 1948; there were 71 meetings until 1966. It was revived in 2014 (72nd) and is now a firm date on the historics calendar

Origins of the Members’ Meeting date back to 1948; there were 71 meetings until 1966. It was revived in 2014 (72nd) and is now a firm date on the historics calendar

Jayson Fong

 

Gurney Cup dicing with the Jim Farley/Alex Brundle 1964 Ford GT40 leading the Richard Means/Rob Huff ’65 GT40

Gurney Cup dicing with the Jim Farley/Alex Brundle 1964 Ford GT40 leading the Richard Means/Rob Huff ’65 GT40

Jayson Fong

 

Old-timers dating from 1903-17 thrilled in the Edwardian-set SF Edge Trophy; the race included a 4-litre Vauxhall and a 27-litre Fiat

Old-timers dating from 1903-17 thrilled in the Edwardian-set SF Edge Trophy; the race included a 4-litre Vauxhall and a 27-litre Fiat

Jayson Fong

 

In the pre-1963 GT Moss Trophy, Jaguar E-type of Niall McFadden wipes out the chicane

In the pre-1963 GT Moss Trophy, Jaguar E-type of Niall McFadden wipes out the chicane

Jayson Fong

 

Mini Coopers, Whitmore Cup

Mini Coopers, Whitmore Cup

Jayson Fong

 

The Hudson Super Six driven by James Collins swaps horsepower for some good old-fashioned people power

The Hudson Super Six driven by James Collins swaps horsepower for some good old-fashioned people power

Jayson Fong

 

Bruno Senna was behind the wheel of Uncle Ayrton’s Lotus 97T from the 1985 F1 season

Bruno Senna was behind the wheel of Uncle Ayrton’s Lotus 97T from the 1985 F1 season

Jayson Fong

 

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

  • “No I wouldn’t say that,” said Mercedes F1 boss Toto Wolff on whether he was planning to negotiate with Max Verstappen. “I always say I don’t flirt outside if I’m happy in the relationship, professionally. I’m super-happy with the line-up that we have. I couldn’t wish for anything better, and Max is at Red Bull, we haven’t had a conversation, we’re continuing our trajectory.” George Russell’s contract with the team runs only until the end of this season.
Race re-start at the Saudi GP

Race re-start at the Saudi GP

DPPI

  • Robert Reid, FIA deputy president of sport, has resigned his position citing “a fundamental breakdown in governance standards”. This is in reference to recent actions of FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem. In a statement Reid – former WRC co-driver of the late Richard Burns – said he had experienced “growing alarm over critical decisions being made without due process or proper consultation. When I took this role, it was to serve the FIA’s members, not to serve power.”
  • Ongoing discussions regarding the 2026 power units are focusing on freeing-up the homologation freeze for any manufacturers struggling to be competitive – and to reduce the electrical contribution to the total power from 50% to 36% (it is currently 15%) in races. Red Bull’s Christian Horner is in favour of this change but MercedesToto Wolff is opposed.
  • Stefano Domenicali has re-committed to his role as president and CEO of F1. The Italian has extended his deal with rights holder Liberty Media for another five years. “Stefano has been an excellent steward of the business, building on its successful foundation and accelerating Formula 1’s rate of growth both commercially and in fan engagement,” said Liberty Media president and CEO Derek Chang.
Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

History played a part in Red Bull’s attempts to bring Max Verstappen into play for the Bahrain Grand Prix. He had won both previous races here using an offset tyre strategy to the other teams. His combination of two sets of C3 softs plus one C1 hard in 2023 and ’24 exaggerated his superiority over the others who were forced to use two set of hards and one soft as they’d needed to use up more sets of softs than the Red Bull in getting through qualifying. But this time the offset was more about trying to get a result which transcended the car’s uncompetitiveness here, Verstappen’s victory in the preceding Japanese Grand Prix notwithstanding.

This year’s race was again a two-stop, such is the thermal stress imposed on the rear tyres by the circuit’s layout and rough surface. But the ’25 Pirellis are rather different to those of the two preceding years. The constructions are tougher and the C2 medium is a more aggressive compound, much closer to the C3 than previously.

Red Bull this time offset its tyre strategy in a different way, hoping that the C1 hard would prove the best race compound and so saving both sets. This involved not using the hard tyre through Friday and Saturday – though it had tried it here in pre-season testing. McLaren and Ferrari preferred to save two of the allocated three sets of mediums for the race, believing it to be the faster tyre and had each used up one of their sets of hards (per car) in the practices. Mercedes was trying to retain as many softs as possible and had only one set of hards and mediums each for the race.

GettyImages-2209483736

Verstappen started the race, like most others, on the soft tyre. Knowing it would be switching to a set of hards at the first stop gave Red Bull the confidence to make an early attempt at undercutting Kimi Antonelli for sixth. That bid failed through the 2sec delay caused by a traffic light malfunction in the pits. But the C1 hard tyre was far worse than hoped, Verstappen reporting that he had “no grip”. There was no compensation in better degradation rates as it became clear the C2 medium – as chosen by most others at the first stops – was a better tyre on the day, with comparable degradation and around 0.3sec faster.

Verstappen came in for his second stop on lap 26, so as to maximise his time on the medium tyre – and suffered a further delay with a sticking front wheel. With most of the field yet to pit he rejoined last but worked his way through the cars. He was quicker on this tyre but still a long way off the McLarens and Mercedes. With the Alpine of Gasly ahead of him forced onto the hards at his second stop by the timing of a safety car, Verstappen was at able to use his mediums to pass him on the last lap. For sixth.

It had been a viable throw of the dice because of the car’s lack of competitiveness. But it simply didn’t work.

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

With a possible world title at stake, the McLaren intra-team battle between Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris is beginning to take shape. So far it’s been characterised by Piastri’s flat-line consistency and calmness and Norris’s more mercurial performances. Partly this reflects their respective personalities but there is also a trait in the current car which Norris is finding unsettling.

“I have been slow this whole weekend,” he said in Bahrain after qualifying only sixth. “I have just been off it. The car is amazing. I have nothing to complain about, the team are doing an amazing job but I am just letting them down. I feel like I’ve just never driven a Formula 1 car before. Struggling a lot. I need to try and find answers… I’m not able to do any of the laps like I was doing last season. There I knew every single corner, everything that was going to happen with the car, how it was going to happen. I felt on top of the car.”

20250413F1-0286

However, Piastri also played a part in Norris’s disappointing grid position. They’d been running consecutively on their final Q3 out-laps, Piastri ahead, albeit with plenty of space between them. In waiting until very late in that lap to begin pushing, Piastri delayed Norris – who was obliged to back off further to create a gap. So on front tyres under-temperature as he began the lap, Norris understeered into Turn 1, oversteered out and dropped over 0.2sec right there.

Norris was much quicker in Jeddah a week later and setting the pace but disastrously crashed in Q3, switching the momentum to Piastri who duly won the race. Team boss Andrea Stella acknowledged how Norris’s struggle with the car’s feedback loop may have played its part in his accident. “When Lando tries to squeeze a few more milliseconds out of the car it doesn’t respond as he expects… It’s an episode that I think starts from some of the work that we have done on the car, which has made it faster, but I think it took something away from Lando in terms of predictability of the car once he pushes the limit. So it’s a responsibility of the team to try and improve the car, and to try and correct this behaviour because we want Lando to be confident…

“These cars are so fast, they are so demanding in terms of just adopting a very natural driving style. Because these cars are too fast to think; you either kind of get what you anticipate from the car, or you’re going to be slow. And Lando doesn’t accept to be slow. So it’s our responsibility to make sure that we give him a car that is at the level of his talent.”

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

As the teams have developed their cars going into the final season of these particular ground effect regulations, so a new limitation has become evident. It was first signposted by Red Bull’s competitive fall partway through last season, but has now been confirmed by all the top teams in the early races of ’25: at the even lower ride heights now made feasible by how much more bounce-resistant the cars are, there is a much bigger aero balance shift between the braking and steady state cornering phases. Maintaining through-corner balance at the downforce levels now being achieved has become incredibly difficult.

This is the equation which McLaren has solved better than anyone else, as was very evident in its victories in the opening two races of the season. But it involves compromise. It seems necessary to surrender some performance in slow corners to have the best balance over the full range of corner speeds. Red Bull, in particular, is still struggling with this compromise. It has an RB21 which is generally competitive in high-speed corners and which can be incredibly good under braking and on slow corner entry. But that latter trait is coming from the same big aero balance shift which – when going the other way as the brakes are released into the corner – gives it the mid-corner understeer which often saps away more lap time than gained on entry. The longer the corner, the more lap time this trait costs.

Max vs Lando Norris, Japan

Max vs Lando Norris, Japan

Getty Images

It’s not that Red Bull is unaware of the nature of the problem. It’s just proving hellishly difficult to address, as Christian Horner recounted in Bahrain, the second of three consecutive weekend races, sandwiched between Suzuka and Jeddah. “The problem is that the solutions, with what we see with our tools compared to what we’re seeing on track at the moment, aren’t correlating. That’s what we need to get to the bottom of: why can we not see within our tools what we’re seeing on the circuit? And when you end up with a disconnect like that, you have to obviously unpick it. We’ve got a strong technical team that have produced some amazing cars over the last few years and I’m confident that they’ll get to the bottom of this issue. But it’s literally, the tool isn’t replicating what we’re seeing on the track, and it’s like telling the time on two different watches.

“The tool isn’t replicating what we’re seeing on the track”

“The wind tunnel has driven us in a direction and so then you end up with a mishmash between what your tools are telling you and what the track data is, and so obviously now as we’re accumulating track data, it’s the track data that’s driving the solutions.”

But the difference in Red Bull’s competitiveness between Suzuka – where Max Verstappen won from pole, keeping the two McLarens tight behind him throughout – and Bahrain, where he was a lowly sixth, illustrated how contrasting track layouts impact differently upon the car’s limitations. At Jeddah the Red Bull was once more as competitive as it had been in Suzuka, after suitable set-up changes. The McLarens, meanwhile, seem to be competitive on any type of track. It’s only the margin of superiority which varies.

Suzuka podium

Suzuka podium

Red Bull Content Pool

Ferrari seems to be experiencing much the same problems as Red Bull: a corner entry Lewis Hamilton describes as “super aggressive” followed by mid-corner understeer. Mercedes, having apparently given up on chasing the last problematical bit of downforce after three years and settled instead on consistency, has come up with what appears to be the closest challenger to McLaren, at least in these opening races. That’s the broad lens through which to understand the competitive swings between the three quite different tracks of Suzuka, Sakhir and Jeddah.

“Mercedes has come up with the closest challenger to McLaren”

Oscar Piastri got offline and had a bit of a moment out of Turn 2 on his final qualifying lap of Suzuka. It defined his weekend. His speed on the rest of the lap suggested that the error had cost him pole and he lined up only third. Lando Norris in the sister McLaren was not quite as attuned this weekend, his underlying speed not as great as Piastri’s, but he did at least put his best sector times together and this put him ahead of Piastri on the grid. But both were pipped by Verstappen driving one of the best laps of his career in a Red Bull with a set-up which had been changed extensively through the weekend up to that point.

top 10 finish in the Far East for Oliver Bearman

Top 10 finish in the Far East for Oliver Bearman

Getty Images

“We’ve turned the car upside down this weekend,” said Horner “Max has been working hard with his engineering team just trying to get the car in a window and then he’s just gone and delivered the most amazing lap.”

Changes were made to the weight distribution, aero balance, rollbars, springs and, perhaps most notably, wing level. The downforce level was reduced into Saturday. It all enabled him to keep in touch with the faster McLarens through the Esses in sector one before taking time out of them into the slow hairpin. His entry speed into the fast Spoon corner was breathtaking and he admitted afterwards that he wasn’t sure if it was going to stick at that speed. With a slight straightline speed advantage over the McLarens down the following straight he was clawing back his earlier deficit before he then used the car’s superb braking performance to be outrageously late on the left pedal into the chicane. It was the finishing touch which secured him the pole.

Verstappen edged out the McLarens in qualifying at Suzuka

Verstappen edged out the McLarens in qualifying at Suzuka

Red Bull Content Pool

“We are still struggling with the through-corner balance,” he said. “On low fuel and new tyres you can mask it a bit and just send it and see, hope that it sticks.”

That lap was the foundation of an against-the-odds victory. It had been assumed that the better balance of the McLarens would give them a tyre advantage after a few laps. But the resurfaced sector one meant that tyre degradation was remarkably lower than it had ever been around here. So the McLaren advantage wasn’t really rewarded. The lack of passing opportunities around a track where an advantage of over 1sec per lap is needed to make an overtake meant that track position was everything. Hence the finishing order in this one-stop race was pretty much the same as the grid order through the top 10, with Verstappen winning from Norris and Piastri, the trio some way ahead of Charles Leclerc’s Ferrari, which had the two faster Mercedes of George Russell and Kimi Antonelli queued behind him.


A week later the layout of the Sakhir track posed very different challenges to those of Suzuka. It had little effect on the competitiveness of McLaren but impacted heavily upon Red Bull. A bewildering number of set-up changes were again made but this time they couldn’t break the RB21’s Enigma code; on a track very demanding of rear tyre temperatures it was bleeding lap time late on overheated rubber. The only cure for this gave it the general understeer balance with which Verstappen qualified seventh, 0.6sec adrift of Piastri’s pole.

The extent of the Red Bull’s problems allowed both Mercedes, Leclerc and Pierre Gasly’s much-improved Alpine to get between him and the McLarens on the grid. But the papaya cars didn’t monopolise the front row: Norris was openly struggling to match Piastri here and lost out to Russell for P2. Piastri was partly responsible for Norris’s under-par final Q3 lap.

Don’t rule out Verstappen just yet – he left Suzuka just a point behind Norris in the drivers’ standings

Don’t rule out Verstappen just yet – he left Suzuka just a point behind Norris in the drivers’ standings

Red Bull Content Pool

On race day Piastri gave as perfect a demonstration of dominance as is practical in this era of tyre conservation and safety cars, pulling out around 6-7sec on Russell and just keeping it at that. A safety car 26 laps from the end (to clear off debris from Yuki Tsunoda oversteering his Red Bull’s rear tyre into the sidepod of Carlos Sainz’s Williams) came at an inconvenient time for both Mercedes and Ferrari as they had no suitable tyres for the remaining stint length. Unlike McLaren, they had no new mediums left. The hards (which is all Leclerc had) were too slow, the softs (as chosen for Russell) were marginal on range. Piastri then just drove off into the distance on his fresh mediums, winning by 16sec.

“Sakhir gave very different challenges to those of Suzuka”

Norris meanwhile had been having an eventful time. As he’d tried to manoeuvre his car closer to the line of his grid box, he overshot it, giving him a 5sec penalty to be taken at his stop. He made a great opening few corners to vault from sixth to third but McLaren – in order to maximise his recovery time from the penalty – pitted him early. Which meant that he was on tyres much older than Leclerc later on and the Ferrari was able to pass him. Upon the restart from the safety car he was mugged by Hamilton too. He quickly re-passed that Ferrari but took a long time to find a way back ahead of Leclerc, thus delaying his arrival onto Russell’s tail to just five laps from the end.

Oscar Piastri, the man of the moment, in Bahrain; we’ll no doubt see this smile a few more times this season

Oscar Piastri, the man of the moment, in Bahrain; we’ll no doubt see this smile a few more times this season

LAT

Russell by this time was coping with a mind-frazzling number of control systems issues in the cockpit. His brake-by-wire had gone into default mode, requiring him to re-arm it after each time he used the brakes. The DRS was not automatically arming either and many of his dashboard functions were dead. He tried radioing the team with what he thought was the back-up radio button but it had been set by the team as the back-up DRS so he inadvertently used DRS outside of the DRS zone for around 1sec, taking care then to back off so as to demonstrate no advantage. All this while trying to get his soft tyres to last and fending off the attacking Norris! It was a remarkable demonstration of unflustered control and the second place he delivered represented one of his career-best drives.

The contrast of Verstappen’s race here and that of a week earlier could hardly have been more stark as he only managed to pass Pierre Gasly’s Alpine for sixth on the last lap.

Piastri leads Charles Leclerc’s Ferrari at the start of the Bahrain GP; he’d also take fastest lap and the win

Piastri leads Charles Leclerc’s Ferrari at the start of the Bahrain GP; he’d also take fastest lap and the win

DPPI


Jeddah moved the challenge more towards that of Suzuka, with its emphasis on high-speed turns of a shorter duration than those of Bahrain. Yet again, the McLarens were straight into the groove; the Red Bull was initially nowhere. There were more re-sets and rethinks at Red Bull between Friday and Saturday as McLaren looked serene, Norris in particular. In Bahrain, he’d admitted he felt all at sea with this car, that the feedback from the front end wasn’t as good as on last year’s car (another of those compromises). But here, through the sixth-gear blasts between the walls, he was driving in a beautiful trance-like flow, the car allowing him to do whatever he liked. Piastri was not quite on the same level here. It seemed the tables had turned again.

“It was a remarkable exercise of unflustered control by Russell”

Then came qualifying. Red Bull had found the car’s sweet spot, just as in Suzuka, and Verstappen was a factor. As the track cooled, so too was Russell’s Mercedes. Norris still looked to have the edge, 0.2sec quicker than anyone in Q1, 0.15sec clear in Q2. Both times he retired to the garage after setting his time and didn’t venture out for second runs, unlike everyone else. That’s how confident he was. Then he crashed. Maybe staying in the garage after setting his fast times in Q1 and Q2 as everyone else made second runs had meant he didn’t have as good a feel for the quick ramping up of track grip. Into his first lap of Q3 he felt how much more grip was available through Turns 1-2 than he had used. Resolving to make amends, he took 7mph more speed into Turn 4 than previously, understeered wide and bounced off the opposite kerb which flicked him into the wall. It was a disastrous error.

Verstappen, meanwhile, in a repeat of Suzuka, delivered a great lap at the perfect time and snatched pole from Piastri by just 0.01sec, with Russell’s Mercedes only a tenth away in third. Without a time on the board Norris would be starting tenth.

Piastri’s win in Saudi Arabia was his third from five; already there’s talk about a first Aussie drivers’ champion since 1980

Piastri’s win in Saudi Arabia was his third from five; already there’s talk about a first Aussie drivers’ champion since 1980

Lars Baron/ Steven Tee

Piastri made a great start, Verstappen got too much wheelspin as they raced towards Turn 1 with the McLaren driver claiming the corner. Verstappen refused to concede and took to the Turn 1 run-off, rejoining in the lead. The stewards later awarded him a 5sec penalty, to be taken at his pitstop. He tried to pull out the required gap in the first stint but couldn’t. He rejoined around 3.5sec behind Piastri who was able to maintain that gap to the flag. Leclerc drove a great race, running his Ferrari long in the first stint to get a nine-lap tyre offset to Russell, enabling him to pass the Mercedes for third in the second stint. Norris came through to be challenging Leclerc at the flag but could find no way by.

Piastri, the new leader of the world championship, was taking quiet satisfaction for having made all the right moves.

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

Where do you start when your task is to interview a Formula 1 driver who is also a friend? To be clear, having worked in F1 for a third of a century, I am chummy with dozens of F1 drivers past and present. But I am close friends with only a few.

“So, Kev, I begin,” sitting in my study at home in London, seeing my old mate in front of me, on a Teams video link, driving through pretty roads in rural Denmark at the wheel of what appears not to be a supercar or anything like one, “what are you driving?”

“A Merc Sprinter van,” he replies. “I’m towing my new kart to a test session. It’s a proper gearbox kart, a quick one, and I’m going to enter the Danish Shifter Karting Championship in it.” And there you have it, in a nutshell. A 32-year-old veteran of 185 F1 grand prix starts Kevin Magnussen may be, but it is racing for its own sake that floats his boat. Yes, he loves Monte Carlo, but not for the mega-bucks or the super-yachts. “Monaco is fantastic in a modern F1 car. Massenet and Casino Square are an awesome challenge, almost unbelievably quick,” he says. If you want to make him happy, give him something with wheels and an engine and ask him to race it as fast as it’ll go.

Matt Bishop, McLaren chief of comms, offering Kevin Magnussen some avuncular advice in 2015

Matt Bishop, McLaren chief of comms, offering Kevin Magnussen some avuncular advice in 2015

LAT

How about a left-field opening question. “Are you aware that you hold two Formula 1 records?” I ask him.

“No, what are they?”

“Well, the first is that you scored 18 world championship points on your grand prix debut, which is a record, because others such as Jacques Villeneuve [second in Melbourne in 1996] and Giancarlo Baghetti [first at Reims in 1961] did what they did when the points scheme was different. Oh and you’re not going to like the second.”

“What is it?”

“Most grands prix started without leading a single lap. You top the list with 185. Martin Brundle is second on 158, by the way.”

GettyImagAt 16, Magnussen stormed Danish Formula Ford with 11 wins from 15 raceses-2199865899

At 16, Magnussen stormed Danish Formula Ford with 11 wins from 15 races

There is a pause, then a chuckle. “Well, I guess my two F1 records accurately reflect how it was. That was my F1 career, wasn’t it? A great head start followed by a long tail end.” It was indeed.

In that great head start, on his F1 debut in Australia in 2014, Kevin finished third on the road, which became second after the disqualification of Daniel Ricciardo, to Nico Rosberg – who, like Magnussen, is the son of an F1 driver. But their childhoods could hardly have been less similar. Nico was born in Germany and raised in Monaco and Ibiza – the doted-on only child of his mother Sina and his father Keke, the 1982 F1 world champion turned successful businessman – and his upbringing benefited from not only parental love but also wealth, privilege and social advantage.

“I’d shown flashes of good form but I’d crashed too often”

“It wasn’t like that for me,” says Kevin. “We really didn’t have much money at all, because my parents were extremely young when I was born. My dad [Jan Magnussen] was 18 and my mum [Britt Peterson] was 17. You could say that when I was a baby they were only kids themselves. Although they were together for my early childhood, she stayed in Denmark to look after me while he went off to the UK to race in Formula Ford. I always say that me and my mum grew up together, because my dad was in England trying to get established as a teenage racing driver. I only saw him when he came back home from time to time.

“It was my uncle, Erik, my dad’s brother, who pushed me to race. He’d been helping my dad in his karting days – he’s a brilliant mechanic – and he’ll be helping me when I’ll be karting this year. Full circle, eh?

Dad Jan is on hand for Kevin after a DNF at Hockenheim in 2008’s ADAC Formel Masters

Dad Jan is on hand for Kevin after a DNF at Hockenheim in 2008’s ADAC Formel Masters

LAT

“Erik taught me and his adopted son, my cousin Dennis [Lind, the GT driver], how to race. Me and Dennis are the same age, and Erik was mega-ambitious for us both, starting us at just two years old. He made us practise three times a week. Obviously I can’t remember it, but that’s what he tells me. And, by the time we were four or five, he was pushing us hard. Maybe not quite as hard as Jos [Verstappen] pushed Max, but not far off it. Erik used to stand next to the kart track, with his foot placed on the edge of it, indicating where we should brake for each corner. If we braked before the mark, he used to give us hell. If we braked after it, he wouldn’t mind at all, even if we crashed. He was hardcore. But it worked, because eventually we learned how to brake where he wanted us to brake and still get around the corner. And when we’d done that, he walked a metre closer to the corner and made us brake later still.”

I am reminded of what Trevor Carlin – who ran Magnussen in British Formula 3 in 2011, during which year they won seven races together – told me about him a few years ago. “Someone once asked me which driver Kevin’s driving style most reminded me of. I had a good think before I answered, then I replied truthfully: ‘Ayrton Senna.’ I particularly remember Kevin’s braking. No one I’ve worked with has ever stopped a racing car quite like Kev did.” We will examine exactly what that means later.

After British F3 in 2011 Magnussen moved up to the Formula Renault 3.5 Series in 2012, racing for Carlin again, and 2013, now with DAMS. In the first of those two seasons he won at Spa and finished second at Aragón and Hungaroring, and the next year he was champion, winning at Spa again, Aragón, Paul Ricard, Barcelona, and Barcelona again, and bagging eight further podium finishes.

By that time he had been a member of McLaren’s Young Driver Development Programme for three years, which is how he and I had first come into contact with each other, since, as McLaren’s then comms/PR chief since 2008, I took a great interest in the YDDP.

After finishing runner-up in Formula Renault 2.0 in 2009, Magnussen joined McLaren’s young driver programme

After finishing runner-up in Formula Renault 2.0 in 2009, Magnussen joined McLaren’s young driver programme

Grand Prix Photo

“After 2012, when I’d won a Renault 3.5 race, I’d shown flashes of good form but I’d crashed too often, Martin [Whitmarsh, McLaren’s team principal] told me that I had to win the Renault 3.5 championship or he’d chuck me off the YDDP. But there was another YDDP member racing in the same championship that year, Stoffel [Vandoorne], and Martin said to us, ‘If one of you wins the championship, you’ll be racing for McLaren in F1 next year.’ So there was enormous pressure on both of us.

“I had the talent, I had the speed, but I needed support”

“I’d been dreaming of racing in F1 since I was a little kid. So in 2013 it felt like my life depended on winning. Honestly, that’s what it felt like. I remember thinking: ‘If I don’t win the championship this year, my life will be shit.’ So I gave it everything, absolutely everything. I won five races – six if you count the one I was disqualified from at Paul Ricard – and I remember one of the races at Hungaroring particularly well. It was raining unbelievably hard – F1 would never run in such weather these days – and qualifying had been interrupted four times, and I had a wheel hub problem, stopping me getting a proper quali lap in, so I started the race from P16. The safety car led the field for the first five laps, and after that I just cut loose. I left no margin anywhere, absolutely flat-out even as it began to rain even harder, and I ended up finishing second. When I passed Stoffel I remember feeling really good. That’s no criticism of him by the way. He’s a great driver and a nice guy. But obviously it was important that I beat him.”


McLaren’s drivers in 2013 were Jenson Button and Checo Pérez. Both were fine, talented wheelmen, and Button, then an ex-F1 world champion of 33, was particularly consistent, extracting the maximum out of our MP4-28, which was not a great car. Pérez, who was just 23, was less reliable, less affable, less polished and less disciplined – a shortfall which irked our chairman Ron Dennis,

Nonetheless, Whitmarsh offered Pérez a contract extension, intending that he would race alongside Button again in 2014. A number of us had hoped he would choose Magnussen instead. Three of us – sporting director Sam Michael, team doctor Aki Hintsa and I – lobbied Dennis to overrule Whitmarsh. In the end he did just that.

His dream move to F1 came in 2014 at McLaren as a replacement for Sergio Pérez; his first race, in Australia, made the record books

His dream move to F1 came in 2014 at McLaren as a replacement for Sergio Pérez; his first race, in Australia, made the record books

Grand Prix Photo

“To be fair to Martin,” Magnussen reminds me, “he’d lined up a Force India drive for me in 2014, which he was able to do because McLaren was helping Force India with various technical inputs at the time. I even did a seat fit for them at their Silverstone factory. Then, one day in the autumn of 2013 when I was at Woking doing a simulator day, I became aware of a weird vibe. Sam passed me in a corridor and smiled at me in this really kind of meaningful way; then you did, too; then Aki texted me to say that good things were happening; then finally Anders [Holch Povslen, the Danish billionaire industrialist who had bankrolled Magnussen’s drives in feeder formulae] called me and said, ‘It’s changed. You’ll be racing for McLaren, not Force India. Ron and I have sorted it.’ I was thrilled.”

In January 2014 Whitmarsh resigned – his relationship with Dennis at a low ebb generally and having been countermanded on a key decision, namely driver selection – and Dennis, who had been chairman for some years, took back his old role of chief executive officer. From now on, he told us, McLaren would once again be his train set.

Magnussen’s last outing for McLaren was the 2015 season-opener in Australia; he was reserve for the rest of the year

Magnussen’s last outing for McLaren was the 2015 season-opener in Australia; he was reserve for the rest of the year

Getty Images

“The strange thing is, I didn’t feel a whole lot of pressure on the flight down to Melbourne for my first grand prix. I was still in my 2013 ‘I’ve got to win everything or else’ mindset, and I remember thinking to myself: ‘I’ve got to win this race.’ I didn’t win it – I finished third on the road, which ended up being second after Daniel’s disqualification – and, even though I knew that was a great result for a rookie on his F1 debut, I’d wanted more. But I enjoyed standing on the podium with Nico and Daniel, seeing and hearing tens of thousands of people shouting and cheering. It was an amazing moment. But I’d got used to winning and, well, I hadn’t won, had I?

“It was only after that race that I began to feel pressure. I remember Jonathan [Neale, managing director] and Éric [Boullier, racing director] telling me, ‘Lewis [Hamilton] was an average of 0.15sec faster than Jenson in qualifying over the three years they raced alongside each other, so, to retain your drive for next year, you should be aiming to beat Jenson by the same margin.’ I accepted it at the time but, looking back, it was unfair. Lewis and Jenson were both F1 world champions, far more experienced than I was, and Jonathan and Éric were telling me that if I wasn’t as good in my rookie season as Lewis had been in his third, fourth and fifth F1 seasons, I’d be out.

Testing of the 919 Hybrid LMP1 in November 2015 but more disappointment was to come for Kevin

Testing of the 919 Hybrid LMP1 in November 2015 but more disappointment was to come for Kevin

Grand Prix Photo

“That was crazy – and also disrespectful to Jenson. I was almost encouraged to regard him as easy to beat, to underestimate him in effect. Well, he was a really good driver. It so happens that in 2014, if you average out our qualifying performances, I did beat him by more or less what they’d asked me to beat him by, but in the races he was brilliant – wise, strategic, good with tyres, clever with weather. Now I wish I’d stood up for myself. I was naive. But, in my defence, I was an F1 new boy. Inevitably, that unfair weight of expectation heaped unnecessary pressure on me, and I began to make mistakes.

“It was a ridiculous set of expectations to push onto a 21-year-old rookie. I had the talent, I had the speed, but I needed support mentally and emotionally, and the senior McLaren management on the racing side offered the opposite.

“And then Jenson and I learned that Fernando [Alonso] would be joining the team for 2015, which meant that obviously one of us was going to get the chop. In late 2014 there was a boardroom meeting to decide who’d race for the team in 2015, and the vote went seven-two in my favour. Only Mansour [Ojjeh] and [Shaikh] Mohammed [Bin Essa Al Khalifa] voted for Jenson. They’d been lobbied cleverly by Jenson’s manager, Richard [Goddard]. Together, Mohammed and Mansour had a majority shareholding, so they used that power to overrule everyone else, including Ron, who’d voted for me, and in 2015 I ended up being the reserve driver, which meant nothing really.

Magnussen is now racing for WRT BMW in the WEC

Magnussen is now racing for WRT BMW in the WEC

LAT

“But Ron said, ‘Trust me, you’ll race for us in 2016, or maybe even before the end of the 2015 season.’ And, honestly, I think he was being sincere. That really was his plan for me. So, when Williams contacted my then manager Dorte [Riis Madsen] about me racing for them in 2016, I talked to Éric about it, and he said, ‘No, stay with us, you’ll race for us with Fernando next season.’ And, honestly, I think he was being sincere, too. So, reassured by both Ron and Éric, I didn’t pursue the Williams option.

“But I became depressed in 2015, I don’t mind admitting that. I lived to race, and I wasn’t racing. I had an offer to do some Super Formula races in Japan, which would have been cool, but Ron said I shouldn’t. In 2016, when Stoffel was the McLaren reserve driver, Ron let him race in Super Formula, and he loved it, winning a couple of races, so I don’t know why Ron didn’t allow me to do the same thing the year before, but anyway he didn’t.”

“I’d gone from F1 to watching my mate race a Porsche at Le Mans”

Increasingly bored as his torpid 2015 wore on, Magnussen began to amuse himself by doing slightly silly things. He spent the Thursday before the Spanish Grand Prix sunbathing on the beach in Barcelona, he fell asleep, and he appeared in the paddock on the Friday comically sunburned. Neale and Boullier were furious. He went to the Le Mans 24 Hours race with some of his mates, travelling there in a Volkswagen campervan. En route they rented motorbikes one afternoon. Kevin fell off his bike and injured his leg. When they got to Le Mans, he sat among regular fans on the outside of the Dunlop Curve, still in pain, drinking beer. “I remember sitting there, seeing my mate Michael [Christensen] go by, lap after lap, and wondering how I’d gone from racing a McLaren in F1 to watching my mate race a Porsche at Le Mans in just a few months. It was then that I thought to myself, ‘What have I become? I simply must get a grip of the situation and find a way to race in F1 next year, because nothing is certain at McLaren, and if I don’t get a McLaren drive next year I may never race in F1 again, whatever Ron or Éric tell me.’”

with Renault for 2016 in F1

With Renault for 2016 in F1

Bad luck continued to dog him. There was a nightclub fracas on the eve of the Chinese Grand Prix, resulting in an early flight home. Then, listless while in Denmark, he was offered a day’s testing on a speedway bike – “just for fun” – but he fell off it, injuring his hand. I think he told Neale and Boullier a white lie about that mishap – “I fell off a bike while training” – allowing them to assume erroneously that it had been a mountain bike. But, even so, the scuttlebutt at Woking was now that Kevin was becoming something of a wild child, a bit frivolous and too accident-prone.

The truth was that Magnussen was but a pawn in a very complicated chess game. Dennis was angry that, although he was the chief executive officer, he had been overruled on driver selection – ironically just as Whitmarsh had been at his, Dennis’s, behest 12 months before – and he wanted to right what he saw as that wrong by pairing Alonso with Magnussen instead of Button in 2016. But boardroom politics are always tricky; McLaren’s boardroom was highly political at that time; and perhaps Ron was not fully aware that he was beginning to lose control of the company, but he was, and he was eventually removed by the board before the end of 2016. Kevin was (in)famously sacked on October 5, 2015, his 23rd birthday, via an email sent by Dennis’s personal assistant Justine Bowen, which was not Ron’s finest hour.

“But I’d had a test with Porsche, an LMP1 shoot-out against a number of other drivers, and I’d done well in it, even though my hand was still painful after my speedway shunt, and I thought, ‘It’s OK, I can be a Le Mans driver for Porsche, just like Michael.’ I got the drive, and I was all set to race for Porsche in 2016 – but then ‘diesel-gate’ happened at the end of 2015 and Porsche pulled the car I should have been in. I felt very lost. I’d almost given up on life. Then Toto [Wolff] called me and offered me a Mercedes DTM test – another shoot-out against a number of other drivers – and again I did well. Gary [Paffett], who’d won a ton of DTM races, was there to set a benchmark lap time, and I beat him, so Toto offered me the drive for 2016.”

celebrating with IMSA Ganassi team-mate in Detroit in 2021

Celebrating with IMSA Ganassi team-mate in Detroit in 2021

Getty Images

Suddenly, another option materialised – a drive for what had recently been the Lotus F1 team but was now about to be renamed Renault again, replacing Pastor Maldonado, who had raced (and often shunted) for the team in 2014 and 2015. Kevin made Toto aware that he had a chance of an F1 drive after all – and, to Wolff’s credit, he allowed him to go for it, reassuring him that his Mercedes DTM offer would be waiting if the Renault opportunity came to naught.

He got the Renault drive. In February 2016, on the evening of the opening day of the first pre-season test, I had dinner with him at El Trabuc in Granollers, which is near Circuit de Catalunya. He was visibly excited about the year ahead and it was clear that a weight had been lifted from his shoulders. I hoped – and believed – that he would carve out a long future for himself at Renault, but the RS16 chassis was a bitter disappointment and, although he outperformed his team-mate Jolyon Palmer, things never quite gelled for him there. “They offered me a contract extension for 2017,” he remembers now, “but I’d seen Carlos’s dad [Carlos Sainz Sr] going in and out of the motorhome quite a lot, so I thought Carlos would probably join the team soon, which he did, so I reckoned that I’d have only one more year there at best.”


I remember that time very well,” I reply. “And when Guenther [Steiner] contacted you, and offered you a Haas drive, and you told him you’d consider it if he matched the money Renault had offered you, and Guenther said yes even though that constituted twice as much money as he’d offered you initially, and you WhatsApped me to tell me all of the above, I remember how I replied. ‘Get your arse in the Haas.’”

“That’s right,” says Kevin, “I remember, and I did exactly that, and I had four years at Haas then. The first two years, 2017 and 2018, were good. I scored points quite often, I made a decent amount of money with all those points bonuses, I had a quick team-mate, Romain [Grosjean], who I used to beat, and I was happy. And early in 2018 I began to drive the Ferrari in the Maranello F1 simulator, in secret, and I did that well, and the Ferrari guys began to take an interest in me. Their drivers were Seb [Vettel] and Kimi [Räikkönen], and they were eyeing up Charles [Leclerc] for 2019. He was racing for Sauber or Alfa Romeo or whatever it was called in 2018, and he started the season badly. But in Baku he raced well to sixth, then he began to score a lot of points after that, and I realised that they were going to go for him, not me.

“I’d like to race in WEC for the next 15 years and win at Le Mans”

“As regards getting my arse into a car better than a Haas, I don’t think I yet realised that my ship had sailed, but I guess it had. Also, the next two years, 2019 and 2020, were less good. Our Haas car wasn’t as competitive or as reliable as it had been before, and then they needed pay drivers for 2021, so they went for Nikita [Mazepin] and Mick [Schumacher]. I was out of F1.”

Geopolitics came to his aid, however: “Putin invaded Ukraine, and that meant that Nikita was out of a Haas drive because he was Russian, and I was back in. Finishing fifth in Bahrain in 2022 on my F1 comeback was mega. But it was really hard to get out of the 2022 WEC contract that I’d just signed for Peugeot, and I had to pay them quite a bit to walk away from it.

“Anyway, by 2024 I wasn’t enjoying Haas, or F1, any more. I didn’t like the new breed of ground-effect cars with low-profile tyres. They don’t suit my driving style, which is to carry as much speed into a corner as I can and brake as I turn in. Also I have a wife and two daughters now and, well, if you do 24 grands prix every year you’re hardly ever at home.”

Halfway through 2024 Kevin announced he would be leaving Haas at the end of year. The remainder of his time with the team was a mixed bag; promising performances dovetailed with mistakes, bad luck and even a one-race ban after an accumulation of penalty points on his superlicence. It was an unfitting end to his time in F1.

A brilliant fifth in Bahrain with Haas on the first race of the 2022 season would be Magnussen’s highest finish of the year

A brilliant fifth in Bahrain with Haas on the first race of the 2022 season would be Magnussen’s highest finish of the year

Getty Images

A third act begins this year, however. “I’m doing a WEC programme with BMW, plus three great IMSA races. I’ve driven at Daytona and Sebring, with Petit Le Mans [at Road Atlanta] to come. It’s perfect. Those races mean a lot to me, because I used to go to them when I was a kid, to support my dad when he was racing in them. I’d like to race in WEC for the next 15 years. Obviously, I’d love to win at Le Mans. If I did that, I think it would be every bit as good as winning in F1, which of course I never did.”

Four years ago he competed in the French classic alongside his dad. “It was cool to get the chance to drive alongside my father [and Anders Fjordbach] at Le Mans in 2021. I looked up to my dad so much as a kid, so to get the chance to compare my own driving with his in the same car at the same time on the same circuit was quite surreal. Looking through the data and comparing my laps with his, and seeing the details of our driving styles, was fascinating. I feel lucky to have had the opportunity to stand in the pitlane at Le Mans, ready for driver change, and have my dad jump out of the car that I’m about to get into.”

A little bit older, a little bit wiser – now Magnussen has set his heart on winning the Le Mans 24 Hours

A little bit older, a little bit wiser – now Magnussen has set his heart on winning the Le Mans 24 Hours

Getty Images

Next month he will line up alongside Raffaele Marciello and Dries Vanthoor in the WRT BMW team at Le Mans: “It’s the big one for all the Hypercar teams and drivers. We have a chance of winning it this year. The thing is, so do most of the Hypercar field. Everyone is so competitive that the result will be decided by the small details of how we execute the race. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see more than half the field on the lead lap at the end, fighting for the win.”

He pauses, and then, to my immense joy after all the ups and downs I have witnessed him go through over the past decade, adds, “I’m really, really looking forward to it.”


Born: 05/10/1992, Roskilde, Denmark

  • 2008 Moves from karting to the Danish Formula Ford Championship; wins title.
  • 2009 Finishes second, behind António Félix da Costa, in Formula Renault 2.0.
  • 2011 Drives for Carlin in British F3; ends the year second behind Felipe Nasr.
  • 2012-13 Two years in Formula Renault 3.5 Series; seventh in ’12, champion in ’13.
  • 2014-15 Moves to F1 with McLaren; finishes second on his debut; ends the season in 11th. Reserve driver in ’15.
  • 2016 With Renault in F1; 16th in the standings. Best finish, seventh (Russia).
  • 2017-20 Haas calls. Best season 2018, finishing ninth, with two fifth-place finishes.
  • 2021 With Ganassi in the IMSA SportsCar Championship; also Le Mans 24 Hours debut alongside dad Jan.
  • 2022-24 Return to Haas, but struggles for points, finishing 13th, 19th and 15th.
  • 2025 Endurance racing with BMW.
Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

The Le Mans 24 Hours is like no other race. There is something about this more-than-100-year-old enduro that drags one back to give it another go, even after disaster or success. As part of a team it is addictive.

After the first time at Le Mans it seemed that it would be easy to talk myself out of going again, but a further 18 times gave me a good idea of what was needed to win this exhausting race. “Easy,” I often say, “just put petrol in, replace the tyres and stay on the road. That is all you have to do.” The hard bit is making sure that this is ‘all you have to do’. And occasionally, that is indeed all the winner has had to do.

You need to have a huge amount of self-belief and an ability to entice money from sponsors if you want to be taken seriously in motor sport. My great friend Richard Lloyd had both those requirements plus an iron will coupled with great charm. We first teamed up to race a Chevrolet Camaro and Opel Commodore during the early 1970s, Richard doing the driving and me all the organisational and tactical stuff.

The Camaro was a frequent winner in the British Saloon Car Championship. But a decision by Richard to get a new VW Golf GTI in 1977 was the start of our road to Le Mans. We modified it so well that we won the up-to-1600cc class in 1977, ’78 and ’79 and we were also second overall in the championship in ’78 .

The next step up was for Richard to buy a Porsche 924 GTR in 1981, with the objective of racing in the European Sportscar Championship, and our real purpose, to race at Le Mans. The Porsche factory had run three 924 GTRs at Le Mans in 1980 so it seemed like a good plan.

Chassis number BS720006 was one of the first customer cars sold and with Canon sponsorship we were set for Europe. It was quickly competitive coming second in the GT class at the Monza 1000Kms, the Silverstone 6 Hours and the Nürburgring 1000Kms races. A good performance at Le Mans seemed possible. Instead, it was a disaster; a new factory fitted engine had a continuous boost control problem. When the car set out down the long Mulsanne Straight the boost gradually disappeared. Tony Dron, who had raced a factory 924 in 1980 and was sharing the car with Richard Lloyd, was very frustrated. The factory decided there was something wrong with the engine and gave us a second ‘works’ engine. This was the same as the first. Dron described how, on the Friday before the race, “I went to the new boss of Porsche, Peter Schutz, and gave him a severe talking-to, but I couldn’t get a result!” His annoyance came from the fact that we were only able to qualify 56th out of a field of just 55 cars that were allowed to start. We missed the cut by a tenth of a second over a plus-4min lap.

In truth it was a good thing that we didn’t qualify. We were hopelessly unprepared for the 24-hour race. We had not realised that you needed a separate timing crew at the signalling pits at the exit of the Mulsanne Corner, with their own caravan or tents and a supply of food and drink to sustain them for the whole event. The old Le Mans pits were just an empty concrete box that smelt strongly of urine.

Stevens’ Canon Porsche 924 GTR, Silverstone 6 Hours, ’81

Stevens’ Canon Porsche 924 GTR, Silverstone 6 Hours, ’81

You had to build your own tables and timing stand too. This was connected to the signal pit by a vintage hand-cranked telephone. Properly equipped teams had radio connections but the signal strength was hopeless unless you built your own 100ft aerials behind the pit and out in the country! And me, five mechanics and our ‘truckie’ Tom (the local Silverstone postman), who looked after the wheels and tyres were never going to survive 24 hours of racing. We had a little motorhome for food but had no place for the drivers to rest between stints.

When I got back home, I wrote myself a letter to be opened at the start of 1982. It said, “DON’T GO BACK TO LE MANS”, but of course we did.

In 1983 Richard and I flew across to Zuffenhausen where Richard handed over a briefcase containing Canon’s money and, as simple as that, we bought a Porsche 956. They said it was in the garage and handed us a key. We went downstairs and Richard drove it out into the yard where I quickly put on Canon stickers.

Just two years later, with the team being run by my great friend David Price, we spent 24 hours chasing the Joest New Man factory-supported Porsche 956 with our Canon 956 driven by James Weaver, Jonathan Palmer and Richard Lloyd. We came second because, as I discovered years later, we had a 2.6-litre customer engine while the Joest car had a factory 2.8-litre. More importantly, all that team did was change tyres and put in petrol while we had to change the Motronic control box, a six-minute job which put us one lap behind. But second seemed pretty good to us as a small, private team, and Tom still looked after the tyres!

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

Much has been written about the McLaren F1 road car; it is now 30 years since five McLaren F1 GTRs finished first, third, fourth, fifth and 13th at Le Mans in June 1995. The F1 had been launched at the Monaco Sporting Club in May 1992. During those 33 years, myth, hearsay and rumour have both enhanced and clouded the history of a sports car that continues to fascinate enthusiasts.

Memory is, of course, an unreliable tool when writing or reading an article or book. We edit our recollections and find it difficult to recall complete conversations, even though they can give veracity to a tale. But luckily, I had got into the habit of writing copious notes in many A5-size notebooks.

A fairy tale Le Mans for the Ueno Clinic-sponsored McLaren.

A fairy tale Le Mans for the Ueno Clinic-sponsored McLaren.

Getty Images

The team at McLaren Cars was small for a project of such complexity as the F1, but some were friends from Lotus, where I was before McLaren, and with the others we gelled into an enthusiastic team, who are still good friends today. Although there was not a suggestion that this might be a racing car, I couldn’t help trying a few things in the wind tunnel to see how tuneable it might be should that next step occur.

It was never my objective with the road car to produce a high-downforce design. With an expected top speed of around 220mph you really want a safe and stable car, but not one that needs springs as stiff as a pick-up truck at normal road speed to cope with the loads at over 200mph. I had used both McLaren’s preferred wind tunnel at the National Physical Laboratory in Teddington and the very old tunnel at what was the Brabham factory. And finally, the MIRA full-size tunnel to confirm our results.

Chobham test track with the McLaren F1 GTR mule, just six months before Le Mans 1995

Chobham test track with the McLaren F1 GTR mule, just six months before Le Mans 1995

Peter Stevens

I had left McLaren Cars by the time both Ray Bellm and Thomas Bscher had persuaded McLaren’s Ron Dennis to produce a version of the F1 in early 1994 that could run in the BPR GT1 race series. Good friend David Price called me later in the year to ask if I would like to come on board as a consultant with his DPR team who were going to run a McLaren F1 in the BPR. His thinking was that having been with the project since its start in 1988, I might know where we could improve the car for the 1995 season. We would have to run on Goodyear race tyres since Michelin had signed exclusively with Bellm’s Gulf McLaren team. Goodyear had a very limited range of compounds, while Michelin had a huge variety, with a choice of intermediate wets, so we were at a disadvantage.

“Ray Bellm and Thomas Bscher persuaded Ron Dennis to produce an F1 for the BPR GT1 series”

Price agreed that we had to be clever. Steve Randle, who was chiefly responsible for the suspension and dynamics of the F1, had given me a copy of a graph of the chassis stiffness which showed from the rear bulkhead back the car was as stiff as a wet fish. We developed a tubular steel structure mounted from the bulkhead back to the rear suspension mounting points, and – hey presto – the car responded to rollbar adjustments. Also, the car could not be run much lower than the road version because the front tyres would hit the outer edges of the windscreen and the supporting flange of the carbon monocoque. Both of these were radically modified.

An F1 GTR at Jerez in 1995’s BPR Global GT Series.

An F1 GTR at Jerez in 1995’s BPR Global GT Series.

Peter Stevens’ sketch highlighting the clutch problem and ending with a forlorn ‘memo to self

Peter Stevens’ sketch highlighting the clutch problem and ending with a forlorn ‘memo to self

Peter Stevens

The Ueno Clinic Le Mans winner of Yannick Dalmas, Masanori Sekiya and JJ Lehto was, in fact, the factory prototype F1 GTR

The Ueno Clinic Le Mans winner of Yannick Dalmas, Masanori Sekiya and JJ Lehto was, in fact, the factory prototype F1 GTR

Sutton Images

Of the seven F1 GTRs in the race, five finished, with Peter Stevens’ Harrods car finishing third – to the delight of the pitcrew

Of the seven F1 GTRs in the race, five finished, with Peter Stevens’ Harrods car finishing third – to the delight of the pitcrew

Getty Images

The basic car was prone to understeer due to a lack of front downforce so we modified both the front splitter and splitter underside. I worked with DPR engineer John Piper on these modifications and also with an aerodynamicist friend from Lotus, John Davies, who supplied us with drawings for a two-piece rear wing which had less drag and was more easily tuneable. Piper came up with a simple system that allowed us to change slide-in Gurney flaps during  a pitstop, according to race conditions. Our Harrods-sponsored car had arrived late for the team. The DPR mechanics had to finish building the car in the pit garage during the April 1995 Jarama race.

“The basic car was prone to understeer so we modified the front splitter and splitter underside”

Later in April was the Le Mans pre-qualifying where John Nielsen was the fastest McLaren. The factory then ran  a 24-hour test at Paul Ricard during May to further upgrade modifications which would be passed on to the other customer F1s, using the No01R mule – which would ‘magically’ find its way into the race when a Japanese customer wanted a last-minute entry. During practice and qualifying for the 24-hour race we had already identified  a clutch-thrust withdrawal bearing problem with the stipulated heavier Le Mans clutch. This had two high-speed needle roller bearings with an oil mist lubricating hole drilled in the casing. This was prone to fracturing across the hole due to the much higher clamping loads caused by a heavier clutch plate and the entry of carbon clutch dust into the bearing. John Piper and I were sent out by David on Friday morning to try to find some more suitable bearings, either sealed or plain. Despite visiting more than 20 possible bearing suppliers we found nothing suitable. David said if nothing was found by 5pm we would have to build the cars knowing that we were likely to have problems. This famously came to pass, of course. Gordon Murray would say later that we should have taken his advice and fitted the old-style clutch plate, but we were working on information that the new plate had done a 24-hour test at Ricard, which it later transpired it hadn’t.

A phalanx of F1s at Le Mans in ’95; seven started

A phalanx of F1s at Le Mans in ’95; seven started

Getty Images

Harrods No51 notes show Justin Bell’s lack of laps

Harrods No51 notes show Justin Bell’s lack of laps

Peter Stevens

In any case, to quote chief mechanic Ted Higgins. “The two DPR cars had a good early race, Nielsen leading in the West car after a four-hour opening stint, and Wallace ran  a three-hour stint, so both cars were right on it. Nielsen and Jochen Mass did the bulk of the driving of the West car.” As Thomas Bscher said to me, “Gentlemen don’t drive at night particularly when it’s wet.”

It was at 3am that the clutch thrust-bearing failed on the West car, and the crew changed the bearing in 79 minutes –  a ‘gearbox out’ job – and at the same time someone changed the brake pads. “But whoever did it forget to put a note on the steering wheel saying it had new pads, and when Nielsen went back out, he went straight off at the second chicane,” said Ted.

Andy Wallace with Derek and Justin Bell on the podium; Gordon Murray reckons they could have won

Andy Wallace with Derek and Justin Bell on the podium; Gordon Murray reckons they could have won

Getty Images

McLaren had provided a little aerofoil for the wiper arm which put so much downforce on the arm that it seized the motor on the West car. Ted recalled, “We ripped the aerofoil off the Harrods car. Peter [me] told us that you didn’t need a wiper above 90mph anyway, the aero blew the water off the screen.”

“Wallace drove the car without the clutch at sufficient pace”

Harrods now led Le Mans, but Derek Bell’s son Justin was not comfortable in the dark and rain. David Price called him in because he was suddenly 15sec a lap slower than JJ Letho in the Ueno Clinic car. Derek, back in the car, was finding gearshifts difficult and spun when the selector engaged first gear with two hours to go. He handed over the car to Andy Wallace who had instructions to not use the clutch. This made starting after his two pitstops tense since he had to start the car in gear while two mechanics ‘helped the car’ into motion. Wallace drove the car without the clutch at sufficient pace to not lose third position.

The Ueno Clinic car had the old type clutch and won. A great performance for McLaren but a frustrating one for our team. Derek will always believe that we should have/could have won, while Gordon Murray still insists that we “threw the race away by not listening to him.”

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

FERRARI
Ferrari 499P

Either factory entry will fancy snatching that Le Mans hat-trick for Ferrari, but the yellow AF Corse 499P has an equal chance of being in contention too. Don’t forget, Robert Kubica and Yifei Ye led the race last year, although how Kubica took out Laurens Vanthoor’s BMW left a stain on the performance. Phil Hanson has switched from Jota, with whom he drove a Porsche last year, to replace Robert Shwartzman – and at 25, will relish the drive of his young life. An overall victory in the biggest race of them all, in a Ferrari, at what will be his ninth Le Mans start, would be quite a story.

The Ferraris kicked off their 2025 World Endurance Championship campaign with a dominant 1-2-3 in Qatar, with the AF Corse car sandwiched by the winning No50 and No51. Safe to say, the hat-trick bid is on.

No50 Antonio Fuoco (I), Nicklas Nielsen (DK), Miguel Molina (ESP)
No51 Alessandro Pier Guidi (I), James Calado (GB), Antonio Giovinazzi (I)
No83 Robert Kubica (POL), Yifei Ye (CHN), Phil Hanson (GB)


PORSCHE
Porsche 963

As Porsche chases its record-extending 20th Le Mans win, Britain’s Nick Tandy will have other landmarks in the back of his mind. He and Felipe Nasr would sweep the big three for 2025 if they can add Le Mans to their recent Daytona 24 Hours and Sebring 12 Hours victories. Tandy has already joined the sports car Triple Crown club having won Le Mans previously for Porsche in 2015, while the Daytona success gave him a unique quadruple of 24-hour overall wins added to those he’s previously collected at Spa and the Nürburgring. Clearly, he’s having a stellar year – but is it too much to expect it to get even better?

Four Porsche 963s will be lighting up Le Mans this year – with Nick Tandy and Felipe Nasr in form

Four Porsche 963s will be lighting up Le Mans this year – with Nick Tandy and Felipe Nasr in form

A notable addition to Porsche Penske Motorsport’s works roster is Pascal Wehrlein, who joins Nasr and Tandy. The reigning Formula E world champion is new to Le Mans, and Porsche will be hoping he can echo Nico Hülkenberg’s rookie win in 2015. If it happens, Tandy would be the common denominator.

No4 Felipe Nasr (BR), Nick Tandy (GB), Pascal Wehrlein (D)
No5 Julien Andlauer (F), Michael Christensen (DK), Mathieu Jaminet (F)
No6 Kévin Estre (F), Laurens Vanthoor (B), Matt Campbell (AUS)
No99 Neel Jani (SUI), Nicolas Pino (CHN), Nicolás Varrone (ARG)


TOYOTA
Toyota GR010 Hybrid

A sixth Le Mans victory faces Toyota. Somehow Mike Conway has only a single La Sarthe win to his name from all those years of Toyota dominance, but missed the race last year through injury. Driver-team principal Kamui Kobayashi has that single victory too from 2021, plus five seconds and a third, while Nyck de Vries will be hungry to go one better than last year when the No7 Toyota was narrowly defeated by the No50 Ferrari.

Toyota’s five Le Mans wins came consecutively from 2018; it will be looking to better its second place of ’24

Toyota’s five Le Mans wins came consecutively from 2018; it will be looking to better its second place of ’24

Toyota Gazoo Racing

In the sister GR010 Hybrid, Sébastien Buemi is bidding to join Derek Bell, Frank Biela and Emanuele Pirro as a five-time Le Mans winner, while Kiwi Brendon Hartley is only one behind his team-mate.

Ryo Hirakawa, who made his first Formula 1 appearance in free practice at the Japanese Grand Prix for Alpine, still has a Le Mans score to settle after his late-race prang in 2023 while chasing the eventual winning Ferrari.

No7 Mike Conway (GB), Kamui Kobayashi (J), Nyck de Vries (NED)
No8 Sébastien Buemi (SUI), Brendon Hartley (NZ), Ryo Hirakawa (J)


CADILLAC
Cadillac V-Series.R

Cadillac has both experience and weight of numbers on its side, although victory at Le Mans would probably still be counted as a shock result. Jota will hope for a less disrupted build-up to the race in its first attempt as a works entry, following the drama of its campaign with a pair of Porsche 963s last year.

Like Porsche, Cadillac will have four cars present in the Hypercar category; it is a serious contender

Like Porsche, Cadillac will have four cars present in the Hypercar category; it is a serious contender

DPPI

How the team worked flat out to repair its No12 963 after Callum Ilott crashed on the Wednesday evening has gone down in Le Mans folklore. A new chassis was required and once supplied by Porsche, Jota completed a preparation job that usually takes three weeks to run the car in a specially sanctioned shakedown on the Le Mans airport runway that runs adjacent to the circuit on the Friday evening. In the circumstances, its 8-9 finish was a victory of sorts. A repeat result this time would only be considered a disappointment.

No12 Will Stevens (GB), Norman Nato (F), Alex Lynn (GB)
No38 Earl Bamber (NZ), Sébastien Bourdais (F), Jenson Button (GB)
No101 Ricky Taylor (USA), Jordan Taylor (USA), Filipe Albuquerque (POR)
No311 Jack Aitken (GB), Felipe Drugovich (BR), Frederik Vesti (DK)


ASTON MARTIN
Aston Martin Valkyrie

As our cover story explains, this is a long-awaited and groundbreaking debut for the Valkyrie at Le Mans. The Aston Martin THOR team has a right to a year’s grace
as it plays catch-up on this Hypercar era. Then again, Ferrari’s 499P won first time out in 2023. High expectations come with the territory at this level.

0015_DG_Valkyrie_March_2025

No007 Harry Tincknell (GB), Tom Gamble (GB), Ross Gunn (GB)
No009 Marco Sørensen (DK), Alex Riberas (ESP), Roman De Angelis (CDN)


BMW
BMW M Hybrid V8

Speed isn’t a problem for the WRT-run BMWs, which should be a factor at Le Mans. Kevin Magnussen makes his second appearance at the 24 Hours following his 2021 debut, when he shared an LMP2 ORECA with his father Jan.

DPPI_02525003_4305

No15 Dries Vanthoor (B), Raffaele Marciello (SUI), Kevin Magnussen (DK)
No20 René Rast (D), Robin Frijns (NED), Sheldon van der Linde (RSA)


ALPINE
Alpine A424

Allez les Bleus! Mick Schumacher gains in his second Le Mans appearance by the arrival of experienced hand Frédéric Makowiecki, fresh from Porsche. Opportunity knocks too for Jules Gounon, son of 1990s F1 racer Jean-Marc, in his first Le Mans start in sports car racing’s premier division. In the other Alpine, Charles Milesi is among the quickest of the era.

Well, look on the bright side, the livery will look  at home in the 24 Hours

Well, look on the bright side, the livery will look at home in the 24 Hours

No35 Paul-Loup Chatin (F), Charles Milesi (F), Ferdinand Habsburg (A)
No36 Mick Schumacher (D), Frédéric Makowiecki (F), Jules Gounon (F)


PEUGEOT
Peugeot 9X8

It’s all been so underwhelming in the first two complete seasons for Peugeot’s novel-looking 9X8. Will it ever come good? If it doesn’t happen soon, what price on the three-time Le Mans winner becoming the first major car manufacturer to pull out of the Hypercar era? Loic Duval is the only Peugeot driver with an overall Le Mans win on his résumé, dating all the way back to 2013 with Audi.

Is this the end of the road for Peugeot’s Hypercar adventure? The 9X8 has been a midfield mainstay

Is this the end of the road for Peugeot’s Hypercar adventure? The 9X8 has been a midfield mainstay

No93 Paul di Resta (GB), Mikkel Jensen (DK), Jean-Éric Vergne (F)
No94 Loic Duval (F), Malthe Jakobsen (DK), Stoffel Vandoorne (B)


LMGT3: A grand entry

How about a McLaren fairy tale 30 years on from its F1?

DPPI_02525003_3827

You can read about LMP2 elsewhere in this issue. As for LMGT3, the sophomore year for the category offers another bumper entry of 24 cars representing nine manufacturers. There is strength in depth too.

Beyond the return of Mercedes, McLaren would love a fitting class win 30 years after its famous overall victory with the F1. United Autosports once again runs a pair of 720S GT3 Evos, with historic racing graduate James Cottingham back for a second crack.

Keep an eye on TF Sport’s Corvettes in LMGT3 – we predict good things for Le Mans

Keep an eye on TF Sport’s Corvettes in LMGT3 – we predict good things for Le Mans

DPPI

Ferrari has the numerical advantage with five 296 GT3s listed on the entry, but one of the two Aston Martin Vantages catches our eye. Not content with balancing the stresses of managing the Valkyrie’s Le Mans debut from the garage and pitwall, team chief Ian James will also pitch for a class win from the cockpit, sharing driving duties with Canadian Zacharie Robichon and Italian Mattia Drudi.

As in LMP2, all bets are off when it comes to predicting who will win. But we’ll tip Sussex-based TF Sport to feature at the class’s sharp end with its pair of Corvette Z06 LMGT3.Rs.

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

The Balance of Performance probably won’t decide who wins the Le Mans 24 Hours. But it could determine who doesn’t. In the two years since the mass influx of manufacturers into the World Endurance Championship’s Hypercar class there have been haves and have nots in terms of the BoP at its blue riband event  in France in the middle of June.

It wouldn’t be a stretch to say that there were only a handful of manufacturers who could win the big race in 2023 and ’24. The BoP, the means by which the playing field is levelled in Hypercar, didn’t give everyone a fighting chance. It was pretty much Ferrari vs Toyota each time, with Cadillac not far behind in ’23 and, along with Porsche, again in ’24.  There’s room for improvement, and the WEC rule makers, the FIA and the Automobile Club de l’Ouest, concede that. The system by which the BoP is calculated remains a work in progress, they say. There have been further tweaks for 2025 as they refine a process driven by race data brought in last year. That included the introduction of the ‘power gain’ element at Le Mans, an adjustment of the maximum performance from the powertrain allowed above 155mph.

A tool that aims to balance the straight-line speeds of the cars is more relevant on the Circuit de la Sarthe with its four flat-out blasts, on the Mulsanne Straight and then on the run to Indianapolis, than anywhere else on the WEC calendar. A season’s worth of experience with ‘power gain’ could be crucial as the FIA and the ACO strive to bring the field together for the most prestigious race of the year.

The problem is that an eight-and-a-half-mile circuit, which is more than 50% public road, is the outlier on the schedule. It’s why the WEC organisation insists that the French race has its own BoP, without explaining exactly what that means.

Toyota chairman Akio Toyoda criticised changes to the BoP in 2023

Toyota chairman Akio Toyoda criticised changes to the BoP in 2023

Getty Images

The BoP for the regular WEC introduced for last year is distinct from the one in force in 2023 when simulation was the primary tool used in its calculation. That was when the rule makers unilaterally changed the BoP at short notice ahead of the first track action at Le Mans – although the guidelines laid down to the manufacturers said they couldn’t. This wiped out Toyota’s large advantage in the opening three races and handed a narrower one to Ferrari.

The FIA and ACO admit that simulation is still a key tool in the formulation of the Le Mans BoP courtesy of the unique characteristics of the circuit. Given that the BoP can’t change – or rather shouldn’t under the latest guidelines  – between the pre-event Test Day, the Sunday ahead of race week, and the race itself, they have one opportunity to get it right.

The pressure is on with an increasing number of factories on the grid for them to get the BoP bang on the money. Because that’s what manufacturers are spending in large amounts to chase victory. Success comes with a prestige that significantly outweighs that attached to winning any of the end-of-season silverware on offer in the WEC. For all the continuing growth of the Hypercar division, the have nots might decide they don’t want to continue putting their hands in their pockets.

No one wants to go to Le Mans without a chance of a result.

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

1. Ferrari goes for the hat-trick

Ferrari will complete a Le Mans 24 Hours hat-trick if it lifts the trophy this year. And the 499P Le Mans Hypercar will remain unbeaten at the French enduro since the Italian manufacturer ended its 50-year factory hiatus from the front of the grid in 2023. Ferrari’s avowed aim this season might be the winning of the a World Endurance Championship title after missing out in each of the past two years. But that’s not to say it isn’t serious about winning Le Mans again. Double points are on offer, so it remains the most important race of the season not just in terms of prestige.

Ferrari has undertaken a no-stone-unturned approach to development of the 499P since its second Le Mans victory. That is, of course, within the confines of the rules that place strict limits on performance upgrades. One so-called evo joker modification was brought online for the Brazilian WEC round at Interlagos last July and there have been none since.

The focus has been on getting the most out of its package – that includes improving reliability. Ferrari wasn’t happy with the failures that blunted its WEC challenge in 2024 and that will clearly be of benefit in its bid to win the season’s longest race.


2. Toyota looking for legacy victory

A shade over a minute and a half. That’s the cumulative time by which Toyota has lost victory to Ferrari at Le Mans over the past two years. The Japanese manufacturer’s GR010 Hybrid might have triumphed both times with a bit of luck — or rather less misfortune — and taken a remarkable seven wins on the trot.
It didn’t work out that way, which means that Toyota is still missing a victory here against serious opposition.

Toyota’s trio of Sébastien Buemi, Brendon Hartley and Ryo Hirakawa in this season’s WEC No8 car have eight Le Mans 24 Hours wins between them

Toyota’s trio of Sébastien Buemi, Brendon Hartley and Ryo Hirakawa in this season’s WEC No8 car have eight Le Mans 24 Hours wins between them

Getty Images

Its five wins on the trot between 2018 and ’22 came against what can only be described as limited opposition: the first three were at the end of the LMP1 era after Audi and Porsche had departed and the next two at the start of the Hypercar era before the big influx of major makers. A win this time around against seven rival OEMs would cement the legacy of a marque that has been a constant at the Circuit de la Sarthe since 2012.

That experience of Le Mans means Toyota will be in the mix. But getting the job done is becoming harder year on year rivals multiply and up their game. In terms of pace Toyota only had to beat Ferrari in ’23 and ’24, and failed to do so.


3. Porsche aims for the big one

Porsche’s big target for this year is victory at Le Mans. It has to be after a season in 2024 in which its 963 LMDh won titles in both the WEC and the IMSA SportsCar Championship in North America.

A quick glance at the results from Le Mans last year would suggest that Porsche wasn’t a million miles away from a 20th outright win. The best of the Porsche Penske Motorsport factory entries in fourth position finished just over half a minute down on the winning Ferrari. The reality, however, was that the Porsche shared by the title-winning trio of Laurens Vanthoor, Kévin Estre and André Lotterer wasn’t a genuine contender. The 963 was tenths, not seconds, off the pace and, perhaps more pertinently, lacked straight-line speed compared with the Ferraris and the Toyota ahead of it. It was, put simply, a less raceable machine.

Porsche scored its 19th Sebring 12 Hours win this year, and also won the Daytona 24 Hours. Can it complete the set?

Porsche scored its 19th Sebring 12 Hours win this year, and also won the Daytona 24 Hours. Can it complete the set?

Porsche AG

A new element of the Balance of Performance was introduced at Le Mans last year: called ‘power gain’, the intent is to equate the top speeds by tweaking the mandated maximum power above and below 155mph for each marque. With a year’s experience, there’s a fighting chance of getting all the cars in the same ballpark.

Don’t bet against a Porsche win. It’s again doing everything to maximise its chances by fielding three factory cars.


4. Cadillac’s time to shine

The big underachiever in the WEC since the Hypercar era began has a big chance to deliver on the promise of the past two years. Not only has Cadillac’s full-season factory campaign been taken over by the British Jota squad, a team with no fewer than 10 Le Mans class podiums in LMP2 and an outright WEC victory to its name, but there’s an expanded presence from the General Motors brand on the grid for the 24 Hours.

The big plus for Caddy is that Jota is running two of its V-Series.R LMDhs in the full world championship season, unlike its predecessor Chip Ganassi Racing. There’s no doubt that Cadillac’s WEC campaigns were held back by the single-car entry, even if Ganassi expanded its entry in France in June by bringing over its IMSA car.

four Cadillac Hypercars will be present at Le Mans

Four Cadillac Hypercars will be present at Le Mans

Nick Dungan

Cadillac will have the biggest factory Hypercar presence on the grid with four cars – Porsche is represented with three works cars and one privateer. Action Express Racing, IMSA champion with the V-Series.R in 2023, is back for its third consecutive Le Mans, while Wayne Taylor Racing makes its debut at the big race. WTR is, as the Americans like to say, one of the ‘winningest’ teams in North American sports car racing and has big ambitions to add a Le Mans victory to its triumphs at the Daytona, Sebring and Petit Le Mans enduros in its homeland.

The V-Series.R has proven pace at Le Mans. It took third on its debut in 2023 and the best of the Ganassi cars was a genuine contender until the final hours last year. A broken underfloor resulted in it fading to seventh.


5. BMW on the up

BMW maintained the momentum that propelled it towards the front of the field in the final races of the 2024 WEC and IMSA series into the new season. The German manufacturer had the pace to win the Daytona 24 Hours IMSA curtain-raiser back in January but lacked the luck, and was then the second-fastest car behind the Ferraris in the opening two rounds of the WEC in Qatar and Imola in February and March.

In IMSA’s GTP category this season BMW’s M Hybrid V8 has proved its pace

In IMSA’s GTP category this season BMW’s M Hybrid V8 has proved its pace

That suggests BMW can build on the promise it showed at Le Mans last year. Dries Vanthoor, pole winner at the Daytona and Sebring IMSA races this year, was quickest in opening qualifying at Le Mans in 2024 and the M Hybrid V8 LMDh showed promise in the race on its Le Mans debut, even if its two cars were out of contention early on.

It would be wrong to call BMW a dark horse given its early season form. It has to be regarded as a genuine contender as it bids to follow up its 1999 Le Mans victory with the V12 LMR.


6. Racing for French pride

This is a big Le Mans for the two French manufacturers competing in Hypercar. Peugeot returns for a third crack at the race with its 9X8 LMH having so far never looked like repeating its La Sarthe victories of previous years with the 905 3.5-litre Group C contender (1992 and ’93) and the first-generation 908 HDi LMP1 turbodiesel (2009).

Alpine, meanwhile, is looking to make up for 2024’s disastrous attempt when both its A424 LMDhs were out of the race before quarter distance.

There was no luck for  the French Hypercars  at 2024’s Le Mans – Peugeot was the highest-placed finisher in 11th

There was no luck for the French Hypercars at 2024’s Le Mans – Peugeot was the highest-placed finisher in 11th

The heavily revised 2024 version of the 9X8, complete with a conventional rear wing, was probably too new to shine at Le Mans last year. Twelve months on there can be no excuses.

An issue with the valve train resulted in the early bath for Alpine last year. It managed the problem through the second half of the maiden campaign for the A424 and made progress towards the front of the field. If le tricolore is waved on the podium after the race, the smart money will be on Alpine drivers doing the waving.


7. A new qualifying format

Le Mans broke with its long traditions when it introduced Hyperpole qualifying in 2020: the grid had been set over multiple sessions for time immemorial. The short, sharp shock format has now been tweaked in the name of increased spectacle.

Instead of eight cars progressing from a one-hour session for the entire grid on Wednesday evening to the Hyperpole session a day later, the field will be split up and another round of qualifying added. Fifteen Hypercars will go through from one opening 30-minute session and the top 12 in each of LMP2 and LMGT3 from a second period of the same duration.

Hyperpole or hyperbole? Le Mans has tweaked  its high-drama qualifying format

Hyperpole or hyperbole? Le Mans has tweaked its high-drama qualifying format

DPPI

Five Hypercars will be knocked out over 20 minutes in a session to be known as Hyperpole 1 or H1 with 10 going through to the 15-minute H2, which will set the first five rows of the grid. In P2 and LMGT3 eight cars will move forward into H2.

The idea is to build the drama through the two days of track running and it will certainly make for a better TV spectacle. Perhaps the real significance, though, is that the Hypercars have been split out from the other classes for qualifying. The old excuse about traffic in the Porsche Curves should become a thing of the past.


8. Mercedes is back

Mercedes is ending an absence from the 24 Hours that dates back to 1999 and its disastrous campaign with the CLR LMGTP coupé when it withdrew from the race on Saturday evening after a third aerial accident of the event. More than a quarter of a century on there will be a trio of Mercedes-AMG GT3 Evos on the grid fielded by the Italian Iron Lynx squad. The German manufacturer missed out on entries into the WEC in the new LMGT3, but it has made a belated entry a year on.

Absent from Le Mans since 1999, Mercedes makes a long-awaited return, albeit with an Iron Lynx-run GT3 racer, not a Hypercar

Absent from Le Mans since 1999, Mercedes makes a long-awaited return, albeit with an Iron Lynx-run GT3 racer, not a Hypercar

DPPI

When Iron Lynx’s relationship with Lamborghini – it ran its SC63 LMDh prototype as well the Huracán GT3 last year – broke down it jumped into bed with Mercedes for its campaign in the WEC’s secondary class. It fields two cars in the full series and has gained an additional entry for the 24 Hours.

Priority was given to GT3 manufacturers also competing in Hypercar when entries were allocated in the new-for-2024 class. There’s no indication that Merc has an LMDh or a Le Mans Hypercar on the stocks, but the return of a manufacturer that has won Le Mans twice, most recently with a Sauber-badged ‘Silver Arrow’ in 1989, is significant.


9. And LMP2…

The LMP2 prototype class, now a de facto one-make division for the ORECA 07 chassis, is bursting with quality on its annual return to Le Mans. There are 17 entries, one more than last year and two up on the 15-car minimum that race organiser the Automobile Club de l’Ouest has promised to maintain, and the majority of the top P2 contenders from around the world are present.

Wakefield-based United Autosports held off Polish team Inter Europol to take the LMP2 honours at Le Mans in 2024

Wakefield-based United Autosports held off Polish team Inter Europol to take the LMP2 honours at Le Mans in 2024

DPPI

The British-based United Autosports squad, winner last year and in 2020, fields a pair of ORECA-Gibsons, ditto Inter Europol Competition, the Polish team that triumphed in 2023. The champion teams from the European and Asian Le Mans Series, AO by TF and Algarve Pro Racing, are present too.

Picking a winner in either the main P2 division or the Pro/Am sub-class that mandates a bronze-rated driver rather than a silver, is an invidious task. There can be no favourites in P2.

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

Aston Martin Valkyrie 007

007

Harry Tincknell, 33 (GB) 

WEC125_Harry Tincknell

The two-time class winner will be making his 12th attempt at the Le Mans 24 Hours, but only his third in the top class. A veteran of the Ganassi-run Ford GT campaigns, he has only raced for Aston once at Le Mans, when he won the GTE Pro class with Alex Lynn and Maxime Martin in 2020.

“To be in the middle of this Hypercar era is absolutely amazing. You’re in the paddock and you think, ‘I can’t believe this is really happening.’ Every brand you can think of, that you associate with speed and luxury, are all here. Not only in WEC but also across the pond in IMSA as well. To think where the top class was not that long ago to where it is now, it is an embarrassment of riches.

“Also there were 14 ex-F1 drivers on the grid in Qatar. The level has never been higher. You feel that is being embraced by the fans. Last year Spa and Imola felt like F1 races. Of course Le Mans is always busy, but in sports car racing you are close to the fans and you can feel the energy from them. Everyone is just buzzing at the level and the commitment from the manufacturers.”

Tom Gamble, 23 (GB) 

WEC125_Tom Gamble

The younger brother of BTCC racer George is a former Autosport BRDC award winner who switched to sports car racing in 2019. Gamble has previous with THOR from IMSA in 2022 and now steps up to Hypercar as one of Britain’s most highly rated young endurance racers.

“I’ve done quite a bit of prototype stuff in LMP2, so that’s beneficial. The cars are of similar dimensions and behave not too dissimilarly. But the Valkyrie is a thing of its own and is a lot different to operate. Compared to LMP2s it is probably slower in the corners, but a lot faster in the straights – a different animal. It’s been exciting to find out what it does and see the improvements the team are making every time we roll the car out.”

Ross Gunn, 28 (GB) 

Ross Gunn

The Aston Martin Evolution Academy gave Gunn a racing lifeline when his single-seater budget ran dry. He shared GT4 honours in the 2015 British GT Championship with Jamie Chadwick driving for Beechdean-AMR and has amassed a wealth of experience in Aston GTs. This will be his fourth Le Mans start, but first since 2021.

“From what we’ve seen in the early races it’s a massive fan favourite already. I don’t want to sound too cocky or arrogant, but we were expecting that. For me at Le Mans, I haven’t raced there for four years and ever since my last race in 2021 I’ve been desperate to get back. To be back on those roads will be so incredible. In the No007, in a Valkyrie, it doesn’t get much better than that. I’m pinching myself.”


Aston Martin Valkyrie 009

009

Marco Sørensen, 34 (DK) 

WEC125_Marco Sørensen

Officially Aston Martin’s most experienced current-era racing driver, Sørensen is a three-time GTE class champion in WEC (twice in Pro, once in Am), and won GTE Am honours at Le Mans in 2022 in a Vantage run by TF Sport. This will be his 11th start at the 24 Hours, all bar one of which have come in Astons.

“Nicki Thiim and I did GTE from 2015 to 2020, and just before Covid hit there was talk about Aston Martin bringing the Valkyrie to Le Mans. Unfortunately it didn’t happen. It would have been a perfect switch after the GTE Pro era to go straight into the Hypercar. So I’ve had four extra years in Pro-Am GT racing, which you still learn a lot from. Now it’s motivating for The Heart of Racing to be a part of this project and get it going again.

“To be in the top class at Le Mans is special. There is no limit from the team, which is what’s inspiring. When you look back, it’s good timing with THOR coming in now. We have the support we need to have a good programme. In the Valkyrie there’s a lot of noise, so you don’t get this clean sound you get on the outside. But if you don’t like the sound of this car, you need to get checked!”

Alex Riberas, 31 (ESP) 

WEC125_Alex Riberas

An old hand with The Heart of Racing in IMSA, Riberas has been at the wheel of Aston Martins since 2020. He has made two previous starts at Le Mans in the GT divisions, both times sharing with THOR team chief Ian James.

“It’s a dream to work with Ian. He has been there in the toughest times of my career. Every occasion I thought I was finished, he was always there for me. He’s a father figure. Years ago we would talk and daydream about such a project without really considering it a possibility. Now we are going into one of the greatest endurance projects in the world.

“To be able to do it with him… he’s the only person I would consider the perfect man to be in that role.”

Roman De Angelis, 24 (CDN) 

WEC_Roman De Angelis, 24

Another THOR regular since 2020, De Angelis (whose middle name is Senna!) has an IMSA GTD class title to his name from 2022. He made his one and only previous start at Le Mans last year in Algarve Pro Racing’s LMP2 ORECA.

“We have a very tight-knit group already. I’ve driven with all the drivers at some point minus Harry, but I’ve spent a lot of time with him. Everyone just gets on which is super-important. This is a team sport and I want to do just as well for my team-mates as well as for myself. I want to leave a weekend knowing I did everything I could. You never want to be in a position where you ruin their day.”

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

In one regard – and it’s one that really shouldn’t be dismissed – Aston Martin is guaranteed a sure-fire hit even before its new Valkyrie racing car has turned a wheel at the Le Mans 24 Hours. That’s because the mean, green machine you see in all its considerable glory here, and which is already hard at work racking up racing miles in both the World Endurance Championship and the North American IMSA SportsCar series, looks certain to be a new fan favourite when the 24 Hours rolls around come June. And not just with the British contingent. Just look at it. What’s not to love?

Aston Martin Valkyrie top rear

With just a few races under its belt, Aston’s Valkyrie is already a fan favourite

Drew Gibson

Then there’s the dazzling, yet also endearingly flawed heritage behind that winged badge. Aston Martin is sewn into the fabric of Le Mans history – for better and for worse. And best of all, the bit our stunning pictures can’t put across: that certain sound. Odin’s V12 thunder will boom across the Circuit de la Sarthe thanks to the Valkyrie, when the 62-car field is unleashed for the 93rd Le Mans 24 Hours on June 14. Who’d have thought an old-school, pure-bred V12 would still be the favoured choice for a high-profile manufacturer attack on the great race, in 2025? That’s got to warm the heart.

So yes, we love it already. At the same time, for all the aesthetics and emotion, racing cars are ultimately judged on cold, hard results. The big question that matters, then – and as always is: will the Valkyrie Hypercar prove to be a winner?

Aston Martin Valkyrie bonnet

A Hypercar, yes, albeit not as powerful as the road-going Valkyrie

Drew Gibson

Not yet perhaps. But speak to the key players, from the suitably named Aston Martin THOR team entrusted to run it and the six drivers who will pedal it, and you sense a hard-edged optimism laced with gritty realism mixed within the touchy-feely stuff. Finally, after decades of intermittent plucky efforts – the Group C AMR1 of 1989, the Lola-based Aston Martin DBR1-2 of 2009 (not to mention the odd disastrous misfire such as the ill-conceived AMR-One of 2011) – Britain’s most charismatic sports car manufacturer might just have a palpable and genuine shot at a first overall Le Mans win since the exulted heroics of Roy Salvadori, Carroll Shelby and DBR1 way back in 1959. Just don’t expect it all to come together at the first time of asking this year.

Aston Martin Valkyrie engine

No hybrid here, just a 6.5-litre naturally aspirated V12.

Drew Gibson

The Valkyrie pitch has some punch. This is the only car built to the Le Mans Hypercar rulebook also adopted by Ferrari, Toyota and Peugeot that is contesting both the WEC and IMSA series, and of all 10 manufacturers currently committed to modern endurance racing’s thriving top tier it’s also the only model derived from a street car – although as one of its British drivers Harry Tincknell correctly points out, “The Valkyrie is not just any road car.” Originally conceived in 2016 as the ultimate production-based extreme performance car largely by Adrian Newey (never one to have much patience with the concept of compromise), the Valkyrie model wasn’t created specifically to win Le Mans. Yet much like Gordon Murray and his McLaren F1 from three decades ago, Newey couldn’t have devised his creation without the thought of racing guiding his hand, consciously or otherwise. As Adam Carter, Aston’s head of endurance motor sport, puts it: “It would be almost unimaginable for Adrian, one of the greatest racing car designers in history, to design a car and not think about it going racing at some point.”


Carroll Shelby, Aston Martin DBR1, Le Mans 1959

Carroll Shelby, Aston Martin DBR1, Le Mans 1959

Now the Valkyrie will attempt to echo the McLaren F1 GTR’s achievement from precisely 30 years ago by transferring directly from the road to victory at the world’s most illustrious and famous endurance motor race. If it does so, if not this year then at some point before the end of the decade, one could argue it would be the ultimate validation for the whole concept of Hypercar and GTP as endurance racing’s premier class. After all, in the wake of the out-of-this-world LMP1 exotica that previously ruled Le Mans, the point of Hypercar in the first place was to create a top class that was relatable to the proverbial man on the street. The original Valkyrie itself was the inspiration for everything we now have and enjoy, and indeed should have been on the first Hypercar grids in 2021 – only for the pause button to be pressed in February 2020 amid a(nother) period of management upheaval at Aston Martin. There was a sense of inevitably when Lawrence Stroll released the play button in October 2023. This car was meant to race at Le Mans – even when it wasn’t.

Aston Martin Valkyrie’s WEC debut Qatar 1812Kms.

The Valkyrie’s WEC debut was February’s Qatar 1812Kms.

“The Valkyrie hypercar is a moment in time in automotive history, and as part of that moment in time, it very much should also race to underline and cement its place in automotive history and its technological achievement,” says Carter with meaning. “By adhering to the Hypercar rules, it’s got a strong association to the DNA of that road car.”

“The familiar No007 entry nods to the still-valued Aston/James Bond association”

In relation to Newey’s original vision, that’s why the racing Valkyrie – on which it should be said the F1 designer has played no part – remains a pure-blood racer: no hybrid complexity, just straight, refreshing power from a modified version of the Cosworth-built 6.5-litre naturally aspirated V12 engine, with an accent on lean-burn efficiency. The V12 in so-called ‘standard’ road-going form (ha!) revs to 11,000rpm and develops over 1000bhp. The irony is in racing spec it won’t produce anywhere near that much because it’s not allowed to. By regulation, the racer – which shares more in common with the AMR Pro track day version than the original base model – is limited to 520kW (697bhp) within the Balance of Performance framework which is at the heart of Hypercar and which allows varying concepts under parallel rulebooks, LMH and LMDh, to race in apparent harmony.

Aston Martin Valkyrie at Sebring

In IMSA, the Valkyrie made its first appearance in Round 2 at Sebring.

But even with less power, won’t the Valkyrie’s evolution from a road car, pitched against rivals with bespoke racers designed without street legality in mind, be at a disadvantage? In theory, no – again because of the way Hypercar has been conceived. “The performance is limited by the regulations, irrespective of development,” explains Carter. “There’s a minimum weight, a power limitation through driveshaft torque control and an aerodynamic performance window. Every competitors’ car gets measured in a full-size wind tunnel. So it’s about optimising the characteristics of the Valkyrie within the fundamental performance contributors.”

Lola-Aston Martin DBR1-2, Le Mans 2009

Lola-Aston Martin DBR1-2, Le Mans 2009

The Valkyrie heads to Le Mans less than a year after it first turned a wheel in anger. Developed in collaboration between the new Silverstone-based Aston Martin Performance Technologies, The Heart of Racing (that’s what THOR stands for) and prolific specialist Multimatic Motorsports, the car embarked on its testing campaign in July last year and is said to have topped 15,000km (9320 miles) of running from initial shakedowns at Donington Park and Silverstone, then on to Vallelunga and Jerez, before continuing in Bahrain, Qatar, Road Atlanta, Sebring and Daytona.

THOR is the US-based creation of Gabe Newell, who gets a lot of the credit for making this project a reality, and British expat Ian James, who Motor Sport first encountered 30 years ago when he was a serious-minded Formula Renault racer plying his trade in a thing called a Ronta – designed and built by a certain chap called Ron Tauranac. James subsequently emigrated and quietly built a formidable stateside reputation as first a highly dependable endurance racer, then as an increasingly accomplished team owner. He describes the project he now leads as a “pinch-me moment”.

Aston Martin Valkyrie

In 2019, Aston was the first manufacturer to add its name to the Hypercar roster but cancelled in 2020; it reversed its decision in late 2023

James signed half a dozen drivers familiar to him to lead the Valkyrie into battle: four for the two-car WEC campaign, two for the solo entry in IMSA. Five of the six are known THOR quantities having been drawn from its GT ranks. Even the ‘interloper’, experienced hand Tincknell, has been folded into this project from the start. The 33-year-old was earmarked for the original, cancelled Valkyrie racing project, has plenty of miles under him in the AMR Pro, has a long association with Multimatic and is even an Aston Martin Le Mans winner. One of his two class wins at the 24 Hours was achieved in a Vantage AMR in the old GTE Pro category back in 2020.

“The DNA of the car and the feel it offers gives me a lot of optimism that it will be successful”

In WEC, an all-British crew occupies the familiar No007 entry that nods to the still-valued Aston/James Bond association, with Tincknell joined by rising star Tom Gamble; in No009 are a pair of trusted THOR GT aces, Dane Marco Sørensen and Spaniard Alex Riberas. Briton Ross Gunn and Canadian Roman De Angelis arrive from the blue IMSA Valkyrie, with Gunn completing a patriotic three-driver No007 line-up for Le Mans and the other longer WEC races, and De Angelis the addition to No009.

Ahead of Le Mans and at the time of writing, the Valkyrie had raced twice. Its world debut came in the WEC season opener, with all six drivers on hand for the 10-hour Qatar 1812Kms, the first occasion THOR had run two cars together. Testing is all very well, but there’s nothing like race mileage to uncover a car’s true status. No one was surprised that it proved a modest debut as new-car bugs reared their heads. Sørensen was at the wheel of No009 in the second hour when the driver’s door unlatched because it had not been shut properly at a pitstop, and it then blew off as he returned to the pits a tad too fast. Nevertheless, the car made it to the chequered flag, 23 laps down on the winning Ferrari 499P. As for the British No007, gearbox trouble forced an early bath after 181 laps.

Aston Martin Valkyrie side profile

Although Adrian Newey wasn’t involved with the Valkyrie racing project, there’s a bit of him in this car

Drew Gibson

The following month Valkyrie took its IMSA bow at the Sebring 12 Hours. Gunn and De Angelis, joined in Florida by Riberas, qualified 12th and finished a respectable ninth on Sebring’s bumps, in what is recognised as one of the most gruelling races in the world. The trio found themselves limited to single stints in the Florida heat and the rough track surface highlighted key areas for development in suspension damping, but a top-10 finish was a reasonable return at this stage.

Aston Martin Valkyrie vents

Inside the cockpit, systems have run smoothly in ’25.

Tincknell offers a driver’s snapshot of where the car is at. “Qatar we knew was going to be a huge learning experience,” he says. “It was the first time the team had come together with two cars and two sets of crew and all the drivers. We were really happy with how well the car ran at the Prologue and went into the race with the aim to get one car to the finish. We achieved that with the No009. The team faced typical new-car issues – funny how they always appear in the race when you haven’t had them through testing! But for us every single lap of data was vital for the rest of the year. We knew we wouldn’t need to build a new trophy cabinet just for Qatar, but the DNA of the car and the feel it offers gives me a lot of optimism that it will be successful.”

Aston Martin Valkyrie gear sticks

Testing of the race version started just a year ago

Tincknell is proud to take his place in Aston Martin history and especially enjoys the Valkyrie’s most notable characteristic. When he wasn’t driving in Qatar, he says there were times when it seemed there were only two cars out there, such was the dominant sonic boom from the two V12s. “The reaction from the fans, the look and the sound of the thing, was awesome,” he says. “As a driver you are selfish and you want everything immediately. We’ve had to manage our own expectations and I said before the weekend we’d be a lot closer in the race than in qualifying – we just hadn’t done any qualifying sims ever before, and understanding the tyre over one peak lap is still something we need to do. But at certain points in the race we were one of the quickest cars on track, which is hugely encouraging.”

Aston Martin Valkyrie labels

“Hand built in Great Britain”

Drew Gibson

Tincknell is unique among the sextet because he has solid Hypercar experience in another make, model and type: the Porsche 963 LMDh he raced for the privateer Proton team over the past season and a half. So we have to ask: how does the Valkyrie compare? “It’s something I’ve been asked a lot,” he admits. “I was speaking to Phil Hanson about this as well because he’s gone from the Porsche to the Ferrari for this year. It does feel like a different category, LMDh versus LMH. There is definitely a different philosophy and way of driving them. The Aston is very pure, shall we say, and ultimately less complicated. Potentially more natural but at the same time you have that bit more weight compared to the LMDh cars and you feel that in the corners. You also have less adjustability [without a hybrid system]. These cars are quite sensitive and obviously in endurance racing the conditions are always changing, as you go into the cold of the night, then the sun comes out and it warms up. Having less adjustability is something we have to get used to.

“But that doesn’t mean LMDh is better. Sometimes you are managing issues caused by the complexity of the hybrid system rather than necessarily using it to your advantage. It’s difficult to compare to the Porsche but I very much like the feel of the Aston, and from the moment I drove it I knew this is the car I want to be in.”

“I like the feel of the Aston. From the moment I drove it I knew this is the car I want to be in”

Alex Riberas, the 31-year-old Spaniard in the No009 car, has relished the experience of adapting from GTs to Hypercar. He describes the Valkyrie as “the most brutal piece of equipment you can imagine driving around a race track with four wheels attached to it. It is a raw design: V12 naturally aspirated with no hybrid. The electronics play a much smaller role than in most race cars and even most road cars. It gives you immediate feedback on everything you do and at the same time you also feel that you can never underestimate how powerful it is and you always have to respect it. As soon as you think you are over the learning curve and you have it under control that’s when it bites you back.”

Aston Martin Valkyrie rear wing

This season is a learning curve for the Aston THOR team

Its road car roots have not been lost, according to Riberas. “You can feel it without a doubt,” he says. “I have driven the Valkyrie AMR Pro on several track days and you can feel the essence of the car in the driving. It’s not only visually; when you drive it there are a lot of similarities in the car behaviour. That’s special because the car at Le Mans is a similar spec to the car on the road.”

For Ross Gunn, the 28-year-old Brit in the IMSA entry who completes the No007 line-up at Le Mans, Sebring represented a clear step on from what Aston Martin THOR had taken from Qatar. Maintaining that progression, each time the car hits the track, is the target between now and June, and then beyond to the end of the WEC and IMSA seasons.

Aston Martin Valkyrie interior steering wheel

There’s an excitement around Aston’s return to top-class endurance racing – and fairy tales can come true at Le Mans, as Ferrari exhibited in 2023

Drew Gibson

“There is still a lot of improvement to make with dampers and shock absorbers,” says Gunn on the Sebring lessons. “Eventually and hopefully we can have something more driver friendly that isn’t so easy to spike the traction control. But in terms of inside the cockpit, the systems, the electric starter and so on, they ran smoothly, which is a big job in itself. We struggled in Qatar but improved by Sebring. It was encouraging. There were periods in the race when we could hang on to top competitors and that was a big surprise to a lot of us.”

So what should we expect for Le Mans? Naturally, there’s plenty of excitement to take this car to the Big One, but the drivers are not about to get carried away. Fan-favourite status will only carry them so far and they stick to a line that’s almost a team mantra: respect for our many rivals comes first, especially as Aston Martin is playing catch up.

Aston Martin Valkyrie wheels

Aston Martin Valkyrie

Riberas perhaps sums it up best. “We are going to Le Mans with the goal of finishing the race. If we are able to do that given the amount of time we have with the car, if we are able to see the chequered flag and run a smooth race, that would equal success in my opinion. But obviously in this world we are all super-competitive and always look at the lap times, wanting to be better and stronger and closer to the top.

“The most important thing is we learn as much as possible from this year’s edition because that will give us the best chance of winning Le Mans sooner rather than later.”


Aston Martin Valkyrie top

Aston Martin Valkyrie Spec

Chassis Carbon monocoque
Engine 6.5-litre V12 naturally aspirated
Power 680bhp
Transmission Xtrac seven- speed sequential, rear-wheel drive
Brakes Alcon 6-piston front and rear calipers, AP Racing carbon discs/pads
Suspension Double wishbone suspension front and rear, pushrod actuated torsion bar springs front and rear with adjustable side and central dampers
Wheels Forged aluminium 12.5x18in front, 14x18in rear
Tyres Michelin Pilot Sport 29/71 – 18 front, 34/71 – 18 rear
Weight 1030kg without driver and fuel (permitted minimum)

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

Great article by Quentin Spurring on the ’75 Spanish GP at Barcelona [“I was walking into the worst day of my motor racing life”, May]. I remember it vividly because I was there as well, and the atmosphere was very tense, especially after only one practice session, which admittedly was spectacular.

1975 Spanish Grand Prix at Barcelona

1975 Spanish Grand Prix at Barcelona

Julian Nowell

I must have been standing almost exactly in the same spot as him after the jump, and before sharp braking for the hairpin left. We spectators were ‘protected’ by a chicken wire fence, with Armco directly in front. When Regazzoni and Lauda crashed I swear I could see the whites of Clay’s eyes as he hurtled towards us skittering along the Armco. Luckily they didn’t flip over it, otherwise I wouldn’t be writing this today. As you can see from the photo of James, above, you could stand directly behind the Armco at various points around the circuit, and even with a humble 35mm camera get some good action shots. Such a sad ending to a very testing race track.

Julian Nowell, Walton-on-Thames


Congratulations on your editorial regarding Eddie Jordan [The Editor, May]. Quite rightly you concentrate on his unique impact on F1 which is undisputed. I have noticed in several eulogies that it is sometimes overlooked that he was no slouch in Formula Atlantic and F3 as he learned motor racing’s machinations. In fact he was up there in the leading bunch among which there were some big names such as Nigel Mansell, Kenny Acheson, Stefan Johansson, Derek Warwick and Nelson Piquet along with many others. On the business side he was instrumental in courting Philip Morris with his Marlboro Team Ireland outfit.

F3 rivals Kenny Acheson and Eddie Jordan at Thruxton, 1980; Jordan, fifth; Acheson, DNF

F3 rivals Kenny Acheson and Eddie Jordan at Thruxton, 1980; Jordan, fifth; Acheson, DNF

Bruce Grant-Braham

His enthusiasm and glint in the eye comes over in this photo from F3 at Thruxton, left – a favourite in my collection. At the time I lived in Poole and the town’s Sunseeker luxury yachts would become  one of his favourites, especially when he took his to the harbour at Monaco.

Do feel free to use this in your Letters page. Keep up the good work.

Bruce Grant-Braham, Wimborne, Dorset


I enjoy reading John Oreovicz’s Postcard from America but I think there’s a misprint in this month’s article [May] which has escaped the editing process. Apparently a drag racer called Bob Tasca has set a speed record at 341.68mph. I could believe 241mph, just about, but 341mph? A misplaced digit, surely?

A reader thought 341mph in a drag car was surely an error, but these cars will soon top 350mph

A reader thought 341mph in a drag car was surely an error, but these cars will soon top 350mph

NHRA

Mark Gladwin, Highgate, London

No misprint. Some are even speculating on a 350mph run in the coming years – Ed


I have had a good go through your recent special edition F1 75: The 75 Greatest Grands Prix which is a very good read. It brings back some memories, though mostly televisual as I don’t think I was actually present at any of the 75 events described. On a whim, I thought that if these are the 75 greatest races, then they probably featured the 75 greatest drivers, so I totted them up and indeed I think it does give an interesting list, with a few surprises.

The top four in my GOAT list are Moss, Fangio, Senna and Prost, followed at a distance by Stewart, Verstappen, Alonso and Villeneuve, with Hamilton and Schumacher rounding out the top 10. Slightly surprising from my viewpoint is that Graham Hill, Lauda and Clark vie with Räikkönen and Button to complete the top 15.

I am sure there is a lot to chew on there, especially the number of multiple world champions who do not make the list, and that of the drivers with the most grand prix wins, Nigel Mansell and Sebastian Vettel are notable by their absence.

Perhaps less surprisingly, the greatest circuits are Monte Carlo, Monza and the Nürburgring, and of course the greatest team is Ferrari, followed by McLaren and Williams. Notable that BRM are still just ahead of Red Bull, but I am sure that will have changed by the time we get to F1 100!

Noel Corrigan, Beckenham, Kent


It is inevitable of course that your supplement on the 75 greatest grands prix should be subjective, in just the same way as any assessment of the greatest grand prix drivers would also be. Furthermore, your determination of the greatest grands prix were not governed by arguably the best drive by the winner, although many were. Nevertheless the stats of the multiple winners of the 75 grands Prix (including half a point for Brooks and Moss who shared a winning drive) is interesting and perhaps does tell us something about who the truly great drivers were. Brooks won 1.5, Clark, Lauda, Jones, Gilles Villeneuve, Mansell, Häkkinen and Schumacher all won 2. Fangio, Graham Hill, Button and Verstappen each won 3. Stewart, Prost, Senna and Hamilton won 4. And miles out in front with 7.5 was Stirling Moss. He, Tony Brooks and Gilles Villeneuve were the only multiple winners not to have won the driver’s world championship. Multiple world champion drivers who didn’t win any of the greatest grands prix were Ascari, Brabham, Fittipaldi, Piquet and Vettel.

Of the drivers no longer competing, Baghetti, Gethin, Beltoise, Nannini and Maldonado all won just a single grand prix in their career that just happened to be one of the 75 greatest.

As ever, lies, damned lies and statistics! But good fodder for friendly dispute. For what it’s worth my top three of all time are: Fangio, Moss and Clark, all of whom were recognised as virtually untouchable by their contemporaries. And as great as they were, Senna and Schumacher were both flawed when the pressure was greatest, and Hamilton who is obviously a stand-out had unreal car superiority.

Andrew Agnew, Christian Malford, Wiltshire


The March issue was a great edition. The Ferrari features were fantastic, and the interview with Luca di Montezemolo [The Luca I know] highly informative. On to The Showroom dealer section and the Jaguar XJ13 [Diligence of Spirit]. The use of the English language is fabulous. We have worked through ‘copy’, ‘fake’, ‘replica’, ‘continuation’ and now it’s ‘evocation’. Despite the owner Mr Wingfield’s attention to detail, and the use of an original motor, it wasn’t built by Jaguar and the Trust sanctioning it as an Authentic Evocation is just a nonsense. In the art world it would be labelled a fake. Pure and simple.

Words fail one of our readers over this Jaguar XJ13 ‘evocation’, which has a £20m price tag

Words fail one of our readers over this Jaguar XJ13 ‘evocation’, which has a £20m price tag

I guess if someone wants to pay £10m/£20m for a replica that’s fine, but for me that would be better spent on an original model of something. Originality and history is the car’s soul.

Lindsay Taylor, Sorrento, Australia


I write to you as a member of the BRDC for over 50 years. The article by Simon de Burton on my old Lola [Soldier of (good) fortune, May] sadly missed out some of the achievements of the wonderful old car. As he said it raced round the world and there were many wins in Zandvoort and the 9 Hours race in Kyalami with Jackie Pretorius co-driving. One could not have wished for a better co-driver.

Barrie Smith tells us there was so much more to say about his beloved Lola – which remains on sale at Mitchell Curated, £POA

Barrie Smith tells us there was so much more to say about his beloved Lola – which remains on sale at Mitchell Curated, £POA

Barrie Smith

Things were going well in Buenos Aires but I hit a large hare which ran across the track and it damaged the radiator causing a blown head gasket!

There is more but you will have to go to my website at frenchpix.com/racingtimes.

Barrie Smith, BRDC


May I thank Max Oxley for the article on Johnny Cecotto [Motorbikes] in the May issue. If there is such a thing as a ‘what could have been’ or ‘unfulfilled talent’ category, it must apply to the kid from Caracas.

I well remember how he burst unto the international arena in 1975, first by coming third at Daytona on a production Yamaha TZ700A followed up by a win at Imola. That of course was just a prelude to what was to follow at the first motorcycle grand prix of the season at Paul Ricard as you covered in your article.

I always thought that it was prophetic that Johnny won his first world title in the same year as Giacomo Agostini won his last. I hoped that it would signal a transfer of the champion’s baton from one rider to another, but as you are aware that never happened despite Johnny scoring what was possibly his greatest victory of his career at Daytona the following year. He did have a BMW M3 named after him. So I guess that is some kind of immortality.

Bryan Caldwell, Vancouver, Canada

That’s right, Bryan, Cecotto moved to four wheels in the 1980s with BMW – Ed


Contact us…

18-20 Rosemont Road, London, NW3 6NE
email: [email protected]

Issue Contents Archive - Page 6 of 2698 - Motor Sport Magazine

Callum Ilott at the Indy 500: my plan to break the Brickyard

Miami is one of the cities that Formula E should race in. The US is one of the holy grail markets for the series and our recent adventures over there have evidenced that there is an upward curve in engagement.

We’ve raced on the West Coast (Long Beach), the Northwest (Portland) and the East Coast (New York), so it was entirely logical for us to go south to Florida again, a decade on from the first visit. It makes a lot of sense to be around this city because the catchment area is huge. It looks likely we will be back next year, and the only question is if we go to Homestead or downtown where Formula 1 races. It feels like the latter is the natural progression and that this event, with one in another major city in 2026, would tick the boxes that are necessary for the championship. If Formula E can make it happen, I think it would be a real boost to have two US dates on the calendar.

At Homestead we saw a massive challenge due to the quirky multilayered track surface which meant that grip levels were minimal on some sections of the circuit but overall tyre wear was very high. There is a huge task this season from a vehicle dynamics point of view with the Gen3 Evo package and in particular the new-spec Hankook tyres.

For us, we had a real mixture of emotions in Miami because after working super hard in the two-month calendar break we found in practice that our one-lap pace had improved. But when it mattered in qualifying, getting into that complex tyre-temperature sweet spot meant there was a mid-grid start for Nick Cassidy and Mitch Evans.

It’s unusual for us not to be participating beyond the group phase of the qualifying system but at Homestead that is what transpired. Yet, with knowing that the race was going to be a really high-energy demand, pack-racing contest, we were confident that we could be in the mix for some strong points.

Sadly for Mitch it all ended when he was the innocent victim of an accident between Jake Hughes and Maximilian Günther at a chicane, forcing him to pit for repairs which was impossible to come back from. It was more misfortune for Mitch and I feel for him because when you have a fighter and a proven winner like him on your team, to see him eliminated like that through no fault of his own is really tough to take.

For Nick, a really solid and promising race was developing whereby he was hitting some great energy targets and looking good on his attack mode strategy and energy consumption. But then he was hit with a track limits violation and knew that a 5sec penalty was going to play out. In any other race that might be something you can overturn, but in a pack-race like the Miami ePrix it was a big hit.

“I think it would be a real boost to have two US dates on the calendar”

Nick never lost focus and drove an excellent final portion of the race to cross the line in a strong eighth place. Although we knew he would get shuffled out of the points after his penalty was applied there was still pride in the way he fought every inch of the way.

Sometimes you come racing and do the hard work but the results don’t always show the progress made. We can see it though because the good performance in free practice and in race power mode gives some motivation to now kick-on and get back to the success we enjoyed last year and at the beginning of this season with Mitch’s win in São Paulo.

We know deep down we have made a step-up in pace, which is good to see because coming up in May we have a series of double-headers at Monaco, Tokyo and Shanghai. For us this intense six-race period will be a real opportunity to get back up the points table.

What you see in Formula E is a movable form book based on specifics of venues to some extent. Points leader Oliver Rowland had a tough and pointless weekend in Miami too.

It’s an on-going process and part of dealing with the disappointment when your race result doesn’t reflect the work put in is just to dig in and get even more focused to turn it around, which Jaguar TCS Racing will be doing.

There are over 300 points left for any individual driver to score this season, and in the teams’ title more than 500 points per team, so there’s plenty of racing still to do.

On a personal level some news broke just after the Miami ePrix around my future whereby at the end of the season I will be moving on from my position as MD at JLR Motorsport and team principal of Jaguar TCS Racing to pursue a new role in motor sport. Since I joined the company in 2013, as a team we have enjoyed many significant accomplishments, including Jaguar’s first world championship win since 1991 last year. It has been an honour and privilege to play a role in Jaguar’s amazing motor sport heritage.

Establishing the Defender entry in the Dakar Rally and World Rally Raid Championship from 2026 has been an amazing journey too, and I know the Jaguar and Defender teams are incredibly strong. I look forward to seeing what they achieve in the future.

I’m determined that we add to those achievements this season too and will chronical our efforts here with Motor Sport until the Formula E season finale on our home turf of London in late July. We will keep fighting hard.